Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/15697
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-16T12:10:38Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-16T12:10:38Z-
dc.date.issued2022-07-29-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/15697-
dc.descriptionEditorial to a Special Issueen_US
dc.description.abstractThe monitoring of active volcanoes is a complex task based on multidisciplinary and integrated analyses that use ground, drones, and satellite monitoring devices. Over time, and with the development of new technology and increasing frequency of acquisition, the use of remote sensing to accomplish this important task has grown enormously. This is especially so with the use of drones and satellites for classifying eruptive events, detecting the opening of new vents, the spreading of lava flows on the surface or ash plumes in the atmosphere, the fallout of tephra on the ground, the intrusion of new magma within the volcano edifice, and the deformation preceding impending eruptions, and others besides. The main challenge in using remote sensing techniques is to develop automated and reliable systems that may assist the decision-maker in volcano monitoring, hazard assessment, and risk reduction. The integration with ground-based techniques represents a valuable additional aspect that makes the proposed methods more robust and reinforces the results obtained. This collection of papers is focused on several active volcanoes, such as Stromboli, Etna, and Vulcano in Italy; the Long Valley caldera and Kilauea volcano in the USA; and Cotopaxi in Ecuador. The authors make use of several different methods to predict and forecast the volcanoes’ future behavior, using insights from the available data or from new automated routines applied to the analysis of existing data. The aim is to enable rapid assessments of the state of a volcano, discovering the connection between variables apparently not related to each other and to the state of the volcano. The development of new or automated routines is an important step forward in the process of forecasting eruptive activities, and this collection comprises several such examples. This Special Issue on the monitoring of active volcanoes using an integration of remote sensing and ground-based techniques comprises twelve papers. Three are focused on the results obtained for Stromboli volcano (Italy), where eruptive activity varies from moderate Strombolian, often accompanied by summit overflows, to highly explosive paroxysms, which are very dangerous both for the local population and for the many tourists who frequently visit the island. The first paper [1] presents the precursors of the paroxysmal and devastating explosive eruptions occurring in 2019. This paper applied an unsupervised analysis of seismic and infrasonic data, comprising a dataset of 14,289 Strombolian explosions occurring over 10 months, using a Self-Organizing Map (SOM) neural network to recognize changes in the eruptive patterns preceding the paroxysms. The SOM analysis identified three main clusters indicating a clear change in Stromboli’s eruptive style before the paroxysm of 3 July 2019. The main clusters were then compared with the recordings of the fixed monitoring cameras and with the Ground-Based Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar measurements, showing that they were associated with different types of Strombolian explosions and different deformation patterns of the summit area.en_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisher.nameMDPIen_US
dc.relation.ispartofRemote Sensingen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries/14 (2022)en_US
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.subjectvolcanic hazarden_US
dc.subjectvolcano monitoringen_US
dc.subjectremote sensingen_US
dc.subjectexplosive eruptionsen_US
dc.titleVolcanic Processes Monitoring and Hazard Assessment Using Integration of Remote Sensing and Ground-Based Techniquesen_US
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden_US
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden_US
dc.description.pagenumber3626en_US
dc.subject.INGV04.08. Volcanologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rs14153626en_US
dc.relation.referencesGiudicepietro, F.; Calvari, S.; D’Auria, L.; Di Traglia, F.; Layer, L.; Macedonio, G.; Caputo, T.; De Cesare, W.; Ganci, G.; Martini, M.; et al. Changes in the Eruptive Style of Stromboli Volcano before the 2019 Paroxysmal Phase Discovered through SOM Clustering of Seismo-Acoustic Features Compared with Camera Images and GBInSAR Data. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1287. [CrossRef] 2. Calvari, S.; Giudicepietro, F.; Di Traglia, F.; Bonaccorso, A.; Macedonio, G.; Casagli, N. Variable Magnitude and Intensity of Strombolian Explosions: Focus on the Eruptive Processes for a First Classification Scheme for Stromboli Volcano (Italy). Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 944. [CrossRef] 3. Calvari, S.; Di Traglia, F.; Ganci, G.; Giudicepietro, F.; Macedonio, G.; Cappello, A.; Nolesini, T.; Pecora, E.; Bilotta, G.; Centorrino, V.; et al. Overflows and Pyroclastic Density Currents in March-April 2020 at Stromboli Volcano Detected by Remote Sensing and Seismic Monitoring Data. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3010. [CrossRef] 4. Freret-Lorgeril, V.; Bonadonna, C.; Corradini, S.; Donnadieu, F.; Guerrieri, L.; Lacanna, G.; Marzano, F.S.; Mereu, L.; Merucci, L.; Ripepe, M.; et al. Examples of Multi-Sensor Determination of Eruptive Source Parameters of Explosive Events at Mount Etna. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 2097. [CrossRef] Calvari, S.; Bonaccorso, A.; Ganci, G. Anatomy of a Paroxysmal Lava Fountain at Etna Volcano: The Case of the 12 March 2021, Episode. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3052. [CrossRef] 6. Calvari, S.; Nunnari, G. Comparison between Automated and Manual Detection of Lava Fountains from Fixed Monitoring Thermal Cameras at Etna Volcano, Italy. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 2392. [CrossRef] 7. Pulvirenti, F.; Silverii, F.; Battaglia, M. A New Analysis of Caldera Unrest through the Integration of Geophysical Data and FEM Modeling: The Long Valley Caldera Case Study. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 4054. [CrossRef] 8. Pailot-Bonnétat, S.; Harris, A.J.L.; Calvari, S.; De Michele, M.; Gurioli, L. Plume Height Time-Series Retrieval Using Shadow in Single Spatial Resolution Satellite Images. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3951. [CrossRef] 9. Inguaggiato, S.; Vita, F.; Diliberto, I.S.; Mazot, A.; Calderone, L.; Mastrolia, A.; Corrao, M. The Extensive Parameters as a Tool to Monitoring the Volcanic Activity: The Case Study of Vulcano Island (Italy). Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1283. [CrossRef] 10. Corsa, B.; Barba-Sevilla, M.; Tiampo, K.; Meertens, C. Integration of DInSAR Time Series and GNSS Data for Continuous Volcanic Deformation Monitoring and Eruption Early Warning Applications. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 784. [CrossRef] 11. Andrade, S.D.; Saltos, E.; Nogales, V.; Cruz, S.; Lee, G.; Barclay, J. Detailed Cartography of Cotopaxi’s 1877 Primary Lahar Deposits Obtained by Drone-Imagery and Field Surveys in the Proximal Northern Drainage. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 631. [CrossRef] 12. Casalbore, D.; Di Traglia, F.; Bosman, A.; Romagnoli, C.; Casagli, N.; Chiocci, F.L. Submarine and Subaerial Morphological Changes Associated with the 2014 Eruption at Stromboli Island. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 2043. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico5V. Processi eruttivi e post-eruttivien_US
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen_US
dc.relation.issn2072-4292en_US
dc.contributor.authorCalvari, Sonia-
dc.contributor.authorBonaccorso, Alessandro-
dc.contributor.authorCappello, Annalisa-
dc.contributor.authorGiudicepietro, Flora-
dc.contributor.authorSansosti, Eugenio-
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione OE, Catania, Italiaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione OE, Catania, Italiaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione OE, Catania, Italiaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione OV, Napoli, Italiaen_US
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione OE, Catania, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione OE, Catania, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione OE, Catania, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione OV, Napoli, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptCNR-IREA-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-8189-5499-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4770-6006-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9947-8789-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6198-8655-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Calvari et al 2022-Editorial.pdfOpen Access published article183.72 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

341
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Download(s)

15
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric