Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/15254
Authors: Berrino, Giovanna* 
Vajda, Peter* 
Zahorec, Pavol* 
Camacho, Antonio* 
De Novellis, Vincenzo* 
Carlino, Stefano* 
Papco, Juraj* 
Bellucci Sessa, Eliana* 
Czikhardt, Richard* 
Title: Interpretation of spatiotemporal gravity changes accompanying the earthquake of 21 August 2017 on Ischia (Italy).
Journal: Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy 
Series/Report no.: 4/51 (2021)
Publisher: Earth Science Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Slovakia
Issue Date: 22-Dec-2021
DOI: 10.31577/congeo.2021.51.4.3
Keywords: Volcano Geodesy
4D gravimetry
co- seismic time-lapse gravity change,
Growth inversion
Subject Classification04.03. Geodesy 
04.08. Volcanology 
05.06. Methods 
Abstract: We analyse spatiotemporal gravity changes observed on the Ischia island (Italy) accompanying the destructive earthquake of 21 August 2017. The 29 May 2016 to 22 September 2017 time-lapse gravity changes observed at 18 benchmarks of the Ischia gravimetric network are rst corrected for the gravitational e ect of the surface deforma- tion using the deformation-induced topographic e ect (DITE) correction. The co-seismic DITE is computed by Newtonian volumetric integration using the Toposk software, a high-resolution LiDAR DEM and the co-seismic vertical displacement eld derived from Sentinel-1 InSAR data. We compare numerically the DITE eld with its commonly used Bouguer approximation over the island of Ischia with the outcome that the Bouguer ap- proximation of DITE is adequate and accurate in this case. The residual gravity changes are then computed at gravity benchmarks by correcting the observed gravity changes for the planar Bouguer e ect of the elevation changes at benchmarks over the same pe- riod. The residual gravity changes are then inverted using an inversion approach based on model exploration and growing source bodies, making use of the Growth-dg inversion tool. The found inversion model, given as subsurface time-lapse density changes, is then interpreted as mainly due to a co-seismic or post-seismic disturbance of the hydrothermal system of the island. Pros and weak points of such interpretation are discussed.
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
406-Article Text-770-1-10-20211222.pdfOpen Access published article20.57 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

415
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s)

74
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric