Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/15178
Authors: Villa, Paola* 
Boschian, Giovanni* 
Pollarolo, Luca* 
Saccà, Daniela* 
Marra, Fabrizio* 
Nomade, Sebastien* 
Pereira, Alison* 
Title: Elephant bones for the Middle Pleistocene toolmaker
Journal: PLoS one 
Series/Report no.: 8/16 (2021)
Publisher: plos
Issue Date: 2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256090
Abstract: The use of bone as raw material for implements is documented since the Early Pleistocene. Throughout the Early and Middle Pleistocene bone tool shaping was done by percussion flaking, the same technique used for knapping stone artifacts, although bone shaping was rare compared to stone tool flaking. Until recently the generally accepted idea was that early bone technology was essentially immediate and expedient, based on single-stage operations, using available bone fragments of large to medium size animals. Only Upper Paleolithic bone tools would involve several stages of manufacture with clear evidence of primary flaking or breaking of bone to produce the kind of fragments required for different kinds of tools. Our technological and taphonomic analysis of the bone assemblage of Castel di Guido, a Middle Pleistocene site in Italy, now dated by 40Ar/39Ar to about 400 ka, shows that this general idea is inexact. In spite of the fact that the number of bone bifaces at the site had been largely overestimated in previous publications, the number of verified, human-made bone tools is 98. This is the highest number of flaked bone tools made by pre-modern hominids published so far. Moreover the Castel di Guido bone assemblage is characterized by systematic production of standardized blanks (elephant diaphysis fragments) and clear diversity of tool types. Bone smoothers and intermediate pieces prove that some features of Aurignacian technology have roots that go beyond the late Mousterian, back to the Middle Pleistocene. Clearly the Castel di Guido hominids had done the first step in the process of increasing complexity of bone technology. We discuss the reasons why this innovation was not developed. The analysis of the lithic industry is done for comparison with the bone industry.
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Villa et al-, 2021.pdfOpen Access published article17.91 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

81
checked on Apr 20, 2024

Download(s)

51
checked on Apr 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric