Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/14992
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-02T09:17:52Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-02T09:17:52Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/14992-
dc.description.abstractThe presence of volcanic clouds in the atmosphere affects air quality, the environment, climate, human health and aviation safety. The importance of the detection and retrieval of volcanic SO2 lies with risk mitigation as well as with the possibility of providing insights into the mechanisms that cause eruptions. Due to their intrinsic characteristics, satellite measurements have become an essential tool for volcanic monitoring. In recent years, several sensors, with different spectral, spatial and temporal resolutions, have been launched into orbit, significantly increasing the effectiveness of the estimation of the various parameters related to the state of volcanic activity. In this work, the SO2 total masses and fluxes were obtained from several satellite sounders—the geostationary (GEO) MSG-SEVIRI and the polar (LEO) Aqua/Terra-MODIS, NPP/NOAA20-VIIRS, Sentinel5p-TROPOMI, MetopA/MetopB-IASI and Aqua-AIRS—and compared to one another. As a test case, the Christmas 2018 Etna eruption was considered. The characteristics of the eruption (tropospheric with low ash content), the large amount of (simultaneously) available data and the different instrument types and SO2 columnar abundance retrieval strategies make this cross-comparison particularly relevant. Results show the higher sensitivity of TROPOMI and IASI and a general good agreement between the SO2 total masses and fluxes obtained from all the satellite instruments. The differences found are either related to inherent instrumental sensitivity or the assumed and/or calculated SO2 cloud height considered as input for the satellite retrievals. Results indicate also that, despite their low revisit time, the LEO sensors are able to provide information on SO2 flux over large time intervals. Finally, a complete error assessment on SO2 flux retrievals using SEVIRI data was realized by considering uncertainties in wind speed and SO2 abundance.en_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisher.nameMDPIen_US
dc.relation.ispartofRemote Sensingen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries/13 (2021)en_US
dc.titleTropospheric Volcanic SO2 Mass and Flux Retrievals from Satellite. The Etna December 2018 Eruptionen_US
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden_US
dc.description.pagenumber2225en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rs13112225en_US
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico5V. Processi eruttivi e post-eruttivien_US
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen_US
dc.relation.issn2072-4292en_US
dc.contributor.authorCorradini, Stefano-
dc.contributor.authorGuerrieri, Lorenzo-
dc.contributor.authorBrenot, Hugues-
dc.contributor.authorClarisse, Lieven-
dc.contributor.authorMerucci, Luca-
dc.contributor.authorPardini, Federica-
dc.contributor.authorPrata, Alfred J-
dc.contributor.authorRealmuto, Vincent J.-
dc.contributor.authorStelitano, Dario-
dc.contributor.authorTheys, Nicolas-
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione ONT, Roma, Italiaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione ONT, Roma, Italiaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione ONT, Roma, Italiaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione ONT, Roma, Italiaen_US
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione ONT, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione ONT, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptUniversité Libre de Bruxelles-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione ONT, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptNorwegian Institute for Air Research, Norway-
crisitem.author.deptJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology.-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione ONT, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9432-3246-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1894-5048-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5812-0377-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6910-8800-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6049-5920-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-5375-1738-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Corradini-et-al_2021_remotesensing-13-02225.pdfOpen Access published article6.63 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

117
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s)

22
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric