Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/14887
Authors: Zaccarelli, Lucia* 
Anselmi, Mario* 
Vassallo, Maurizio* 
Munafò, Irene* 
Faenza, Licia* 
Sandri, Laura* 
Garcia, Alexander* 
Polcari, Marco* 
Pezzo, Giuseppe* 
Serpelloni, Enrico* 
Anderlini, Letizia* 
Errico, Maddalena* 
Molinari, Irene* 
Zerbinato, Giampaolo* 
Morelli, Andrea* 
Title: Practical Issues in Monitoring a Hydrocarbon Cultivation Activity in Italy: The Pilot Project at the Cavone Oil Field
Journal: Frontiers in Earth Science 
Series/Report no.: /9 (2021)
Publisher: Frontiers
Issue Date: Nov-2021
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2021.685300
URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2021.685300/full
Keywords: Italian guidelines for monitoring industrial activities
induced seismicity
pore pressure monitoring
deformation monitoring
seismic monitoring
Subject Classification04.06. Seismology 
05.09. Miscellaneous 
04.02. Exploration geophysics 
04.03. Geodesy 
Abstract: In this paper we describe the results of an experimental implementation of the recent guidelines issued by the Italian regulatory body for monitoring hydrocarbon production activities. In particular, we report about the pilot study on seismic, deformation, and pore pressure monitoring of the Mirandola hydrocarbon cultivation facility in Northern Italy. This site hosts the Cavone oil field that was speculated of possibly influencing the 2012 ML 5.8 Mirandola earthquake source. According to the guidelines, the monitoring center should analyse geophysical measurements related to seismicity, crustal deformation and pore pressure in quasi real-time (within 24–48 h). A traffic light system would then be used to regulate underground operations in case of detecting significant earthquakes (i.e., events with size and location included in critical ranges). For these 2-year period of guidelines experimentation, we analysed all different kinds of available data, and we tested the existence of possible relationship between their temporal trends. Despite the short time window and the scarce quantity of data collected, we performed the required analysis and extracted as much meaningful and statistically reliable information from the data. We discuss here the most important observations drawn from the monitoring results, and highlight the lessons learned by describing practical issues and limitations that we have encountered in carrying out the tasks as defined in the guidelines. Our main goal is to contribute to the discussion about how to better monitor the geophysical impact of this kind of anthropogenic activity. We point out the importance of a wider seismic network but, mostly, of borehole sensors to improve microseismic detection capabilities. Moreover, the lack of an assessment of background seismicity in an unperturbed situation -due to long life extraction activities- makes it difficult to get a proper picture of natural background seismic activity, which would be instead an essential reference information for a tectonically-active regions, such as Northern Italy.
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
2021FRONTIERS_Zaccarelli-etal.pdfOpen Access published article6.06 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

954
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s)

40
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric