Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/14537
Authors: Wang, Kang* 
Dreger, Douglas Scott* 
Tinti, Elisa* 
Burgmann, Roland* 
Taira, Taka'aki* 
Title: Rupture Process of the 2019 Ridgecrest, California Mw 6.4 Foreshock and Mw 7.1 Earthquake Constrained by Seismic and Geodetic Data
Journal: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 
Series/Report no.: 4/110 (2020)
Publisher: SSA
Issue Date: 2020
DOI: 10.1785/0120200108
Abstract: The 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence culminated in the largest seismic event in California since the 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine earthquake. Here, we combine geodetic and seismic data to study the rupture process of both the 4 July Mw 6.4 foreshock and the 6 July Mw 7.1 mainshock. The results show that the Mw 6.4 foreshock rupture started on a northwest‐striking right‐lateral fault, and then continued on a southwest‐striking fault with mainly left‐lateral slip. Although most moment release during the Mw 6.4 foreshock was along the southwest‐striking fault, slip on the northwest‐striking fault seems to have played a more important role in triggering the Mw 7.1 mainshock that happened ∼34hr later. Rupture of the Mw 7.1 mainshock was characterized by dominantly right‐lateral slip on a series of overall northwest‐striking fault strands, including the one that had already been activated during the nucleation of the Mw 6.4 foreshock. The maximum slip of the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake was ∼5m⁠, located at a depth range of 3–8 km near the Mw 7.1 epicenter, corresponding to a shallow slip deficit of ∼20%–30%⁠. Both the foreshock and mainshock had a relatively low‐rupture velocity of ∼2km/s⁠, which is possibly related to the geometric complexity and immaturity of the eastern California shear zone faults. The 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake produced significant stress perturbations on nearby fault networks, especially along the Garlock fault segment immediately southwest of the 2019 Ridgecrest rupture, in which the coulomb stress increase was up to ∼0.5MPa⁠. Despite the good coverage of both geodetic and seismic observations, published coseismic slip models of the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence show large variations, which highlight the uncertainty of routinely performed earthquake rupture inversions and their interpretation for underlying rupture processes.
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
29_2020_Wang_etal_BSSA.pdfmain_text10.78 MBAdobe PDF
Show full item record

Page view(s)

45
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s)

4
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric