Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/12755
Authors: Petruccelli, Antonio* 
Schorlemmer, Danijel* 
Tormann, Thessa* 
Rinaldi, Antonio Pio* 
Wiemer, Stefan* 
Gasperini, Paolo* 
Vannucci, Gianfranco* 
Title: The influence of faulting style on the size-distribution of global earthquakes
Journal: Earth and Planetary Science Letters 
Series/Report no.: /527 (2019)
Issue Date: 2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2019.115791
Keywords: statistical seismology earthquake size-distribution faulting styles Anderson’s theory of faulting Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion
Anderson’s theory of faulting
faulting styles
earthquake size-distribution
statistical seismology
Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion
Subject Classification04. Solid Earth
Abstract: We derive a unifying formulation, reliable at all scales, linking Anderson’s faulting theory with the earthquake size-distribution, whose exponent is known as the b-value. Anderson’s theory, introduced in 1905, related fault orientation to stress conditions. Independently, laboratory measurements on acoustic emissions have established that the applied differential stress controls their b-value. Our global survey revealed that observed spatial variations of bare controlled by different stress regimes, generally being lower in compressional (subduction trenches and continental collisional systems) and higher in extensional regimes (oceanic ridges). This confirmed previous observations that the b-value depends on the rake angle of focal mechanisms. Using a new plunge/dip-angles-based b-value analysis, we also identified further systematic influences of faulting geometry: steep normal faults (also typical of the oldest subduction zones) experience the highest proportion of smaller events, while low-angle thrust faults (typical of youngest subduction zones) undergo proportionally larger, more hazardous, events, differently from what would be expected by only allowing for rake-angle dependency. To date, however, no physical model has ever been proposed to explain how earthquakes size-distribution, differential stress and faulting styles relate to each other. Here, we propose and analytically derive a unifying formulation for describing how fault orientation and differential stresses determine b-value. Our formulation confirms that b-values decay linearly with increasing differential stress, but it also predicts a different dip-dependent modulation according to the tectonic environment, opening up new ways of assessing a region’s seismic hazard.
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
EPSL_115791_proofs.pdf4.5 MBAdobe PDF
Manuscript_AP_2.pdfOpen Access from dec 216.49 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
mmc1.docxsuppl. mat.1.63 MBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 20

4
checked on Feb 10, 2021

Page view(s)

161
checked on Mar 27, 2024

Download(s)

203
checked on Mar 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric