Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/12194
Authors: Taroni, Matteo* 
Marzocchi, Warner* 
Roselli, Pamela* 
Title: Reply to comment on "Assessing CN earthquake predictions in Italy"
Journal: Annals of Geophysics 
Series/Report no.: 1/ 61 (2018)
Issue Date: 16-Jan-2018
DOI: 10.4401/ag-7424
metadata.dc.identifier.URL: https://www.annalsofgeophysics.eu/index.php/annals/article/view/7424/6863
Subject ClassificationEarthquake prediction; Model validation; Italy
Abstract: Molchan et al. [2018] raised concerns on the reliability of the main Taroni et al.’s [2016] conclusion that reads “Considering the data available so far, the Molchan Test does not show that CN prediction performance is significantly better than predictions based on the stationary Poisson model.” In particular, Molchan et al. [2018] discuss two main issues: 1) the Taroni et al.’s [2016] results are based on too few data to achieve robust conclusions, and 2) the parimutuel gambling score (PGS) produce unfair results in comparing predictive models. We thank Molchan et al. [2018] to give us this opportunity to clarify further some aspects of our paper, but we anticipate that we do not see any compelling reason to modify our original conclusion.
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
7424-19411-1-PB-2.pdf98.85 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

21
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Apr 4, 2020

Download(s)

8
checked on Apr 4, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric