Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Authors: Taroni, Matteo* 
Marzocchi, Warner* 
Roselli, Pamela* 
Title: Reply to comment on "Assessing CN earthquake predictions in Italy"
Issue Date: 16-Jan-2018
Series/Report no.: 1/ 61 (2018)
DOI: 10.4401/ag-7424
Subject ClassificationEarthquake prediction; Model validation; Italy
Abstract: Molchan et al. [2018] raised concerns on the reliability of the main Taroni et al.’s [2016] conclusion that reads “Considering the data available so far, the Molchan Test does not show that CN prediction performance is significantly better than predictions based on the stationary Poisson model.” In particular, Molchan et al. [2018] discuss two main issues: 1) the Taroni et al.’s [2016] results are based on too few data to achieve robust conclusions, and 2) the parimutuel gambling score (PGS) produce unfair results in comparing predictive models. We thank Molchan et al. [2018] to give us this opportunity to clarify further some aspects of our paper, but we anticipate that we do not see any compelling reason to modify our original conclusion.
Appears in Collections:Papers Published / Papers in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
7424-19411-1-PB-2.pdf98.85 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
checked on May 27, 2019


checked on May 27, 2019

Google ScholarTM