Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/11985
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-14T11:48:14Zen
dc.date.available2018-12-14T11:48:14Zen
dc.date.issued2018-12-11en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/11985en
dc.description.abstractThis paper illustrates the results of a research conducted during a Master’s degree entitled “Master in Management of Research, Innovation and Technology”, organised by the Graduate School of Business, run by the Politecnico di Milano, between February 2016 and July 2017. The research goal was to map the complex system supporting the “Open Science” paradigm and the so-called “Big Data”, with a particular focus on the Italian research environment, where INGV (Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia) operates. In addition to transferring the necessary expertise on the management of the innovation and the technology transfer, the Master’s degree offered the unique chance to encounter and exchange experiences with people operating at different levels, fields and environments, such as universities, research centres, ministries, and private companies. The three authors of this paper reflect the heterogeneous audience of the Master’s courses, with a lawyer working at the Italian Ministry of Education, Universities and Research active in the field of European Research Infrastructures, and two technologist working at INGV, one managing seismological data, and the other working as a chief engineer of the data centre in Bologna. The -very- different backgrounds of the three authors, allowed the exploration of the Open Science paradigm and the use of the Big Data in modern Science, mastering regulatory, scientific and technological aspects. To achieve a complete mapping, the authors underwent an extensive bibliographical search, and took advantage of their respective experience matured in their professional activities. The result is a comprehensive, interdisciplinary analysis, meant to give food for thought and clear suggestions to decision makers, supporting them in a more proactive, efficient, planning.en
dc.language.isoItalianen
dc.publisher.nameIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV)en
dc.relation.ispartofQuaderni di geofisicaen
dc.relation.ispartofseries148/ (2018)en
dc.subjectOpen Scienceen
dc.subjectData disseminationen
dc.subjectlicenzeen
dc.subjectlicenseen
dc.subjecteposen
dc.subjectemsoen
dc.subjecteoscen
dc.subjectdataen
dc.titleOpen Science per il futuro della Ricerca europeaen
dc.title.alternativeOpen Science for the future of European Researchen
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.description.pagenumber1-60en
dc.identifier.URLhttp://www.ingv.it/editoria/quaderni/2018/quaderno148/en
dc.subject.INGV04.06. Seismologyen
dc.subject.INGV05.02. Data disseminationen
dc.subject.INGV04.08. Volcanologyen
dc.relation.referencesAgID, Agenzia per l’Italia Digitale, (2017a). Linee guida per la qualità delle competenze digitali nelle professionalità ICT. Aggiornamento del manuale operativo “Dizionario dei profili di competenza per le professioni ICT”. http://open.gov.it/wpcontent/uploads/2017/05/professioniICT.pdf Aica, Assinform, Assintel, Assinter, (2017). Osservatorio delle competenze digitali 2017. Scenari, gap, nuovi profili professionali e percorsi formativi. Report del progetto condotto in collaborazione con AgID e MIUR. http://www.agid.gov.it/sites/default/files/osservatorio_competenze_digitali_2017.pdf Allcott H., Gentzkow M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Working Paper No. 23089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w23089 ALLEA, All European Academie, (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity, Revised Edition. Berlin, 11 pp. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/hi/h2020ethics_codeofconduct_en.pdf ANDS, Australian National Data Service, (2011). Persistent Identifiers. Australian National Data Service Guides, Expert level. http://ands.org.au/guides/persistentidentifiersexpert.pdf ANVUR, Agenzia Nazionale di Valutazione del sistema Universitario e della Ricerca, (2011). Sul documento ANVUR relativo ai criteri di abilitazione scientifica nazionale: commenti, osservazioni critiche e proposte di soluzione. http://www.anvur.org/images/Riferimenti_normativi/Documento_02_11.pdf ANVUR, Agenzia Nazionale di Valutazione del sistema Universitario e della Ricerca, (2015). ORCID ID: il nuovo identificativo dei ricercatori italiani. Progetto IRIDE, ultimo accesso ottobre 2015. http://www.anvur.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=829 Archer P., Goedertier S., Loutas N., (2013). Study on persistent URIs: with identification of best practices and recommendations on the topic for the Member States and the European Commission. http://philarcher.org/diary/2013/uripersistence ASCB, American Society for Cell Biology, (2012). San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). http://www.ascb.org/files/SFDeclarationFINAL.pdf Atakan K., Bazin PL, Bozzoli S., Freda C., Giardini D., Hoffmann T., Kohler T., Kontkanen P., Lauterjung J., Pedersen H., Saleh K., Sangianantoni A., (2017). Setting the stage for the EPOS ERIC: Integration of the legal, governance and financial framework. EGU General Assembly 2017, Geophysical Research Abstracts, vol.19, EGU201712890. http://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2017/EGU201712890.pdf Bailo D., Paciello R., Rabissoni R., Sbarra M., Vinciarelli V., (2018). Integration of heterogeneous data, software and services in Solid Earth Sciences: the EPOS system design and roadmap for the building of Integrated Core Services. Rapporti Tecnici INGV, vol.393, 22pp. http://www.ingv.it/editoria/rapporti/2018/rapporto393/ Barbera R., Ardizzone V., Ciuffo L. (2009). Grid INFN Virtual Laboratory for Dissemination Activities. In: Udoh E. and Zhigang Wang F. (eds.), “Handbook of Research on Grid Technologies and Utility Computing: Concepts for Managing LargeScale Applications”, IGI Global. DOI: http://doi.org/10.4018/9781605661841.ch024 BernersLee T., (1998). Semantic Web Road map. https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html BernersLee T., Hendler J. and Lassila O., (2001). The Semantic Web. A new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities. Scientific American, 284(5). https://www.scientificamerican.com/magazine/sa/2001/0501/ Borghi J., Abrams S., Lowenberg D., Simms S., Chodacki J., (2018). Support Your Data: A Research Data Management Guide for Researchers. Research Ideas and Outcomes, 4:e26439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e26439 CCSDS, Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems, (2012). Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS).Washington, DC, CCSDS Secretariat. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:14721 CRUI, (2013a). Position statement sull’accesso aperto sui risultati della ricerca scientifica in Italia. http://www.cnr.it/sitocnr/Iservizi/Biblioteche/Position_statement_OA_IT.pdf Cox A.M. and Ting Tam W.W., (2018). A critical analysis of lifecycle models of the research process and research data management. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(2):142157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM1120170251 DCC, Digital Curation Centre (2013). Checklist for a Data Management Plan, v4.0. http://www.dcc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/resource/DMP/DMP_Checklist_2013.pdf Dolenc J., Hünenberger P., Renn O., (ed.) (2016). Metrics in Research – For better or worse? ETH Zurich, Infozine Special Issue S1. http://www.infozentrum.ethz.ch/uploads/user_upload/pdf/PDFs_Infozine/Infozine_Special_Issue_1.pdf DPC, Digital Preservation Coalition, (2015). Digital Preservation Handbook, 2nd Edition. http://handbook.dpconline.org/ EASE, European Association of Science Editors (2007). EASE statement on inappropriate use of impact factors. https://www.ease.org.uk/wpcontent/uploads/ease_statement_ifs_final.pdf EC DGInformatics, Directorate General Informatics of the European Commission, Interoperability unit (2017). New European Interoperability Framework, Promoting seamless services and data flows for European public administrations. https://ec.europa.eu/isa2/sites/isa/files/eif_brochure_final.pdf EC DGResearch, DirectorateGeneral for Research and Innovation of the European Commission (2016)(a). Open Innovation Open Science Open to the World - a vision for Europe. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2777/061652 EC DGResearch, DirectorateGeneral for Research and Innovation of the European Commission (2016)(b). Realising the European Open Science Cloud. First report and recommendations of the Commission High Level Expert Group Research and on the European Open Science Cloud. https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/realising_the_european_open_science_cloud_2016.pdf EC DGResearch, DirectorateGeneral for Research and Innovation of the European Commission (2017)(a). Guidelines to the Rules on Open Access to Scientific Publications and Open Access to Research Data in Horizon 2020. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020hioapilotguide_en.pdf EC DGResearch, DirectorateGeneral for Research and Innovation of the European Commission (2017)(b). Providing researchers with the skills and competencies they need to practise Open Science. 36pp. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2777/121253 EC DGResearch, DirectorateGeneral for Research and Innovation of the European Commission, (2017c). Sustainable European Research Infrastructures – A call for action. 60 pp. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2777/76269 EC DGResearch, DirectorateGeneral for Research and Innovation of the European Commission, (2018a). access to and preservation of scientific information in Europe. Report on the implementation of Commission Recommendation C(2012) 4890 final Study, 96 pp. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2777/642887 EC DGResearch, DirectorateGeneral For Research and Innovation of the European Commission, (2018b). Prompting an EOSC in practice. Interim report and recommendations of the Commission 2nd High Level Expert Group [20172018] on the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). 88 pp. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/conferences/eosc_summit_2018/prompting_an_eosc_in_practice_eosc_hleg_interim_report.pdf EDP, European Data Portal, (2015). Creating Value through Open Data. Capgemini Consulting for the European Data Portal Project. https://www.europeandataportal.eu/sites/default/files/edp_creating_value_through_open_data_0.pdf EDP, European Data Portal, (2017). Re-using Open Data - A study on companies transforming Open Data into economic & societal value. Capgemini Consulting for the European Data Portal Project. https://www.europeandataportal.eu/sites/default/files/reusing_open_data.pdf EGI, European Grid Infrastructure, (2015). Open Science Commons, v3. White paper, European Grid Infrastructure (EGI). http://go.egi.eu/oscwp eIRG, eInfrastructure Reflection Group, (2013). White paper. Report “eirg1005”, H2020 Project “eInfrastructure Reflection Group Support Programme 5” (eIRGSP5). http://eirg.eu/documents/10920/11274/eirgwhitepaper2013final.pdf eIRG, eInfrastructure Reflection Group (2017a). Evaluation of e-Infrastructures and the development of related Key Performance Indicators. Report “eirg1005”, H2020 Project “eInfrastructure Reflection Group Support Programme 5” (eIRGSP5). http://eirg.eu/catalogue/eirg1005 eIRG, eInfrastructure Reflection Group, (2017b). Guide to e-Infrastructure Requirements for European Research Infrastructures. Report “eirg1004”, H2020 Project “eInfrastructure Reflection Group Support Programme 5” (eIRGSP5). http://eirg.eu/catalogue/eirg1004 Elta Smith E., Gunashekar S., Lichten C., Parks S., Chataway J. (2016). A framework to monitor open science trends in the EU. RAND Europe, Cambridge UK. https://www.oecd.org/sti/063%20%20OECD%20Blue%20Sky%202016_Open%20Science.pdf EPOS, European Plate Observing System, (2016). Legal framework, Governing EPOS, Data Policy and Access Rules. https://www.eposip.org/node/167/pdf ESFRI, European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures, (2016). Strategy report on research infrastructures, Roadmap 2016. https://ec.europa.eu/research/infrastructures/pdf/esfri/esfri_roadmap/esfri_roadmap_2016_full.pdf ESFRI, European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures, LongTerm Sustainability Working Group, (2017). Long-Term Sustainability of Research Infrastructures. ESFRI Scripta Volume II, 48 pp. http://www.esfri.eu/sites/default/files/u4/ESFRI_SCRIPTA_SINGLE_PAGE_19102017.pdf EU Working Group on Open Science Rewards, (2017). Evaluation of Research Careers Fully Acknowledging Open Science Practices: Rewards, Incentives and/or Recognition for Researchers practicing Open Science. European Commission, DirectorateGeneral for Research and Innovation, Directorate B OpenInnovation and Open Science, Unit B.2 — Open Science and ERA Policy, 34 pp. https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/os_rewards_wgreport_final.pdf Floridi L., (2015). Semantic Conceptions of Information. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/informationsemantic/ Force11, Data Citation Synthesis Group, (2014a). The FAIR data principles. Martone M. (ed.), San Diego. https://www.force11.org/group/fairgroup/fairprinciples Force11, Data Citation Synthesis Group, (2014b). Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles. Martone M. (ed.), San Diego. https://www.force11.org/group/jointdeclarationdatacitationprinciplesfinal Galimberti P., (2012). Qualità e quantità: stato dell’arte della valutazione della ricerca nelle scienze umane in Italia. Italian Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science (JLIS), vol.3, n.1. DOI: http://doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it5617 GEO, Group on Earth Observations, (2015). Data Management Principles Implementation Guidelines. http://www.earthobservations.org/dswg.php Hodson S., Uhlir P., Chu W., (2015). The Value of Open Data Sharing. Report for Group on Earth Observations, CODATA. https://www.earthobservations.org/documents/dsp/20151130_the_value_of_open_data_sharing.pdf Hodson S., Jones S., Collins S., Genova F., Harrower N., Mietchen D., Petrauskaité R. and Wittenburg P., (2018a). FAIR Data Action Plan: Interim recommendations and actions from the European Commission Expert Group on FAIR data. Interim report of the European Commission Expert Group on FAIR data. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1285290 Hodson S., Jones S., Collins S., Genova F., Harrower N., Laaksonen L., Mietchen D., Petrauskaité R. and Wittenburg P., (2018b). Turning FAIR data into reality: interim report from the European Commission Expert Group on FAIR data. 86 pp. Interim report of the European Commission Expert Group on FAIR data. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1285272 INGV, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, (2015). Costituzione del Gruppo di Lavoro sulla politica dei dati PoliDat. Decreto del Presidente INGV n.223 del 11 giugno 2015. http://comunicazione.ingv.it/images/AmministrazioneTrasparente/decretoPresidente223.2015.pdf INGV, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, (2016). Principi della Politica dei Dati dell’INGV. Decreto del Presidente INGV n.200 del 26 aprile 2016. http://istituto.ingv.it/lingv/amministrazionetrasparente1/contenutiatvari/decretiedelibereanno2016/decretodp200.2016.pdf INGV, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (2017a). Politica di accesso aperto ai contributi della ricerca scientifica INGV. Delibera del CdA n.408: Allegato N al Verbale n. 08/2017, del 17 luglio 2017. http://istituto.ingv.it/images/altri_regolamenti/PolicyAccessoContributiRicercaINGVCdAdef.pdf INGV, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (2017b). Costituzione Gruppo di Lavoro denominato “Backup servizi e dati”. Decreto del Direttore Generale INGV n.101 del 9 febbraio 2017. http://istituto.ingv.it/lingv/amministrazionetrasparente1/contenutiatvari/2017decretidelibere/decretodg101.2017.pdf INGV, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (2017c). Costituzione Gruppo di Lavoro denominato “Rete dati”. Decreto del Direttore Generale INGV n.102 del 9 febbraio 2017. http://istituto.ingv.it/lingv/amministrazionetrasparente1/contenutiatvari/2017decretidelibere/decretodg102.2017.pdf INGV, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (2018a). Approvazione del Documento di attuazione della politica dei dati dell'INGV. Delibera n.651/2018, Allegato U al Verbale n.05/2018, del 25 luglio 2018. http://istituto.ingv.it/it/amministrazionetrasparente/disposizionigenerali/attigenerali/attiamministrativigenerali/decretiedelibere/anno2018/deliberedelconsigliodiamministrazione/8740datidellingvpdf/file.html INGV, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (2018b). Costituzione Ufficio Gestione Dati "UGD". Decreto del Presidente INGV n.349/2018, del 9 novembre 2018. http://istituto.ingv.it/it/amministrazionetrasparente/disposizionigenerali/ attigenerali/attiamministrativigenerali/decretiedelibere/anno2018/decretidelpresidenteedeldirettoregenerale4/9100n349dpcostituzioneufficiogestionedatiugdpdf/file.html Kenna R., Mryglod O., Berche B., (2017). A scientists’ view of scientometrics: not everything that counts can be counted. Condensed Matter Physics, vol.20, n.1. DOI: http://10.5488/CMP.20.13803 Kenney R.A. and McGovern N.Y., (2003). The Five Organizational Stages of Digital Preservation. In: Digital Libraries: A Vision for the Twentyfirst Century, a festschrift to honor Wendy Lougee. University of Michigan Scholarly Monograph Series. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3998/spobooks.bbv9812.0001.001 Landry B.C., Mathis B.A., Meara N.M., Rush J.E., Young C.E., (1973). Definition of some basic terms in computer and information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol.24, n.5. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240504 Lavoie B.F,. (2014). The Open Archival Information System Reference Model: Introductory Guide (2nd edition). Digital Preservation Coalition, Technology Watch Series Report 1402 October 2014, 37 pp. DOI: http://www.dpconline.org/docman/technologywatchreports/1359dpctw1402/file Leonelli S., (2017). Mutual Learning Exercise Open Science - Altmetrics and Rewards Incentives and Rewards to engage in Open Science Activities. European Commission, DirectorateGeneral for Research and Innovation Directorate A, Policy Development and Coordination, Thematic Report No 3. https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10871/31348/MLEOSReport3_Final.pdf LERU, League of European Research Universities, Research Data Working Group, (2016). LERU Roadmap for Research Data. http://www.leru.org/files/publications/AP14_LERU_Roadmap_for_Research_data_final.pdf Mayernik M.S., Di Lauro T., Duerr R., Metsger E., Thessen A. E., Choudhury G.S. (2013). Data conservancy provenance, context, and lineage services: key components for data preservation and curation. Data Science Journal, vol.12. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2481/dsj.12039 McMurry J.A., Juty N., Blomberg N., Burdett T., Conlin T., Conte N. et al., (2017). Identifiers for the 21st century: How to design, provision, and reuse persistent identifiers to maximize utility and impact of life science data. PLoS Biology 15(6): e2001414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001414 MIUR, gruppo di lavoro sui Big Data, (2016). Big Data @MIUR. Rapporto tecnico, Ministero dell’Istruzione dell’Università e della Ricerca. http://www.istruzione.it/allegati/2016/bigdata.pdf Moreau L., (2010). The Foundations for Provenance on the Web. Foundations and Trends in Web Science, vol. 2, Nos. 23 (2010) 99–241. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1561/1800000010 Nielsen M., (2011). Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science. Princeton University Press, 280 pp. http://press.princeton.edu/titles/9517.html OECD, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, (2015). Making Open Science a reality. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1787/5jrs2f963zs1en Orth A., Pontika N., Ball D., (2017). FOSTER’s Open Science Training Tools and Best Practices. IOS Press, pp.135141. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3233/9781614996491135 Pappalardo M., Beranzoli L., Favali P., Mairi Best, Piera J., Dañobeitia J.J., Huber R., Waldmann C., Rolin J.F., Petihakis G., (2015). Data Management Plan. H2020 EMSODEV, Work Package 6 “Data management platform”, Deliverable 6.1, 36pp. https://emdesk.eu/shared/56a87775876a916f059520226aeb16659f00b93d0522a Paskin N., (2010). Digital Object Identifier (DOI) System. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, Third Edition, pp.15861592. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1081/EELIS3120044418 Potočnik J., (2007). The EU’s Fifth Freedom: creating free movement of knowledge. Informal Competitiveness Council, Wuerzburg (Germany), 26 April 2007. http://europa.eu/rapid/pressrelease_SPEECH07257_en.pdf RAND Europe (2017). Open Science Monitoring. Methodological Note. European Commission Directorate General for Research and Innovation and received funding under specific contract 2015/RTD/A6/SC/PP027412015. Regione EmiliaRomagna, (2016). Emilia Romagna Big Data Community, From Volume to Value, 2nd edition. Regione EmiliaRomagna, rapporto di programmazione 20142020, 48pp. http://formazionelavoro.regione.emiliaromagna.it/altaformazionericerca/allegati/From_volume_to_value.pdf/at_download/file/Bigdatasecond_edition.pdf RDA, (2015). Data Foundation and Terminology guidelines. Research Data Alliance, Data Foundation and Terminology Work Group Products. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15497/068250498CA440BDBCAFDE9F0EA2FADF RDACODATA, Legal Interoperability Interest Group, (2016). Legal Interoperability of Research Data: Principles and Implementation Guidelines, v1.0. Research Data Alliance. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.162241 Richards K., White R., Nicolson N., Pyle R., (2011). A Beginner’s Guide to Persistent Identifiers, version 1.0. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), Copenhagen, 33 pp. http://links.gbif.org/persistent_identifiers_guide_en_v1.pdf RossHellauer T., (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 2; referees: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2017, 6:588. DOI: http://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2 Shadbolt N., Hall W. and BernersLee T., (2006). The Semantic Web Revisited. IEEE Intelligent Systems Journal, 21(3):96101. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2006.62 Schöpfela J., Prosta H., Rebouillatb V., (2017). Research Data in Current Research Information Systems. Procedia Computer Science, vol.106. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.03.030 Science|Business, (2017). Governing the Open Science Cloud. Science|Business Network’s Cloud Consultation Group. Science|Business, (2018). The European Open Science Cloud: Who pays for what? Science|Business Network’s Cloud Consultation Group. Science Europe, Working Group on Research Policy and Programme Evaluation, (2016). Position Statement on Research Information Systems. Science Europe, Brussels. http://www.scienceeurope.org/wpcontent/uploads/2016/11/SE_PositionStatement_RIS_WEB.pdf Simmhan Y.L., Plale B., Gannon D., (2005). A Survey of Data Provenance Techniques. Computer Science Department, Indiana University, Technical Report IUBCSTR618. https://www.cs.indiana.edu/ftp/techreports/TR618.pdf Starr J. et al., (2014). DataCite metadata schema for the publication and citation of research data, metadata schema, version 4.0. DataCite e.V., Hannover, Germany. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5438/0012 Starr J. and Gastl A., (2011). isCitedBy: a metadata scheme for DataCite. DLib Magazine, 17(1/2). DOI: http://doi.org/10.1045/january2011starr Stewart Lowndes J.S., Best B.D., Scarborough C., Afflerbach J.C., Frazier M.R., O’Hara C.C., Jiang N., Halpern B.S., (2017). Our path to better science in less time using open data science tools. Nature Ecology & Evolution, Vol.1, 7pp. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1038/s415590170160 STOA, Science and Technology Options Assessment, (2014). Measuring scientific performance for improved policy making. Science and Technology Options Assessment, European Parliamentary Research Service, 24pp. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2014/527383/IPOLJOIN_ET(2014)527383(SUM01)_EN.pdf Thanos C., (2017). Research Data Reusability: Conceptual Foundations, Barriers and Enabling Technologies. Publications 2017, 5(1), 2, 19pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications5010002 UNESCO, (2015). Research Evaluation Metrics. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, UNESCO, Paris. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002322/232210E.pdf Vezzoso S., (2008). Open Access: scelte istituzionali e ruolo del diritto d’autore. In: Atti del Convegno “Pubblicazioni scientifiche, diritti d’autore e Open Access”, 20 giugno 2008, Università degli Studi di Trento, Quaderni del Dipartimento di Scienze Giuridiche, vol.79, pp.8195. http://eprints.biblio.unitn.it/archive/00001589/02/unico_2_versione_12_5_2009.pdf Whyte A. and Tedds J., (2011). Making the Case for Research Data Management. Digital Curation Centre (DCC) Briefing Papers, Edinburgh, 8pp. http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/briefingpapers Wiley (2014). Researcher data sharing insights. https://hub.wiley.com/community/exchanges/discover/blog/2014/11/03/howandwhyresearcherssharedataandwhytheydont?referrer=exchanges Wilkinson M.D. et al., (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, vol.3, Macmillan Publishers Ltd. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18 Wilsdon J., Allen L., Belfiore E., Johnson B. (2015). The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management. Higher Education Funding Council for England. DOI: http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363en
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico4SR TERREMOTI - Preparazione alla comunicazione in emergenzaen
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico6SR VULCANI – Servizi e ricerca per la societàen
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico7SR AMBIENTE – Servizi e ricerca per la societàen
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico4IT. Banche datien
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico2TM. Divulgazione Scientificaen
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.relation.issn1590-2595en
dc.contributor.authorPavoncello, Graziaen
dc.contributor.authorLocati, Marioen
dc.contributor.authorCacciaguerra, Stefanoen
dc.contributor.departmentMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (MIUR)en
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italiaen
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1it-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (MIUR)-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2185-3267-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0605-6799-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.classification.parent05. General-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

589
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s)

188
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check