Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/10193
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallSagnotti, L.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallGiaccio, B.; IGAG, CNRen
dc.contributor.authorallLiddicoat, J. C.; Barnard College, Columbia University, USAen
dc.contributor.authorallNomade, S.; IPSL, CEA/CNRS/UVSQ et Universit´e Paris–Saclay, Franceen
dc.contributor.authorallRenne, P. R.; Berkeley Geochronology Center, Berkeley, USAen
dc.contributor.authorallScardia, G.; Universidade Estadual Paulista, Brazilen
dc.contributor.authorallSprain, C. J.; Berkeley Geochronology Center, Berkeley, USAen
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-29T13:52:44Zen
dc.date.available2015-12-29T13:52:44Zen
dc.date.issued2016-02-02en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/10193en
dc.description.abstractA recent study of the Matuyama–Brunhes (M-B) geomagnetic field reversal recorded in exposed lacustrine sediments from the Sulmona Basin (Italy) provided a continuous, highresolution record indicating that the reversal of the field direction at the terminus of the M-B boundary (MBB) occurred in less than a century, about 786 ka ago. In the sediment, thin (4–6 cm) remagnetized horizons were recognized above two distinct tephra layers—SUL2- 19 and SUL2-20—that occur ∼25 and ∼35 cm below the MBB, respectively. Also, a faint, millimetre-thick tephra (SUL2-18) occurs 2–3 cm above the MBB.With the aim of improving the temporal resolution of the previous Sulmona MBB record and understanding the possible influence of cryptotephra on the M-B record in the Sulmona Basin,we performed more detailed sampling and analyses of overlapping standard and smaller samples from a 50 cm-long block that spans the MBB. The new data indicate that (i) the MBB is even sharper than previously reported and occurs ∼2.5 cm below tephra SUL2-18, in agreement with the previous study; (ii) the MBB coincides with the rise of an intensity peak of the natural remanent magnetization (NRM) intensity, which extends across SUL2-18; (iii) except for a 2-cm-thick interval just above tephra SUL2-18, the rock magnetic parameters (k, ARM, Mr, Ms, Bc, Bcr) indicate exactly the same magnetic mineralogy throughout the sampled sequence. We conclude that either SUL2-18 resulted in the remagnetization of an interval of about 6 cm (i.e. during the NRM intensity peak spanning ∼260 ± 110 yr, according to the estimated local sedimentation rate), and thus the detailed MBB record is lost because it is overprinted, or the MBB is well recorded, occurred abruptly about 2.5 cm below SUL2-18 and lasted less than 13 ± 6 yr. Both hypotheses challenge our understanding of the geomagnetic field behaviour during a polarity transition and/or of the NRM acquisition process in the Sulmona lacustrine sediment.en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisher.nameWiley-Blackwellen
dc.relation.ispartofGeophysical Journal Internationalen
dc.relation.ispartofseries/204(2016)en
dc.subjectPalaeomagnetic secular variation; Rapid time variations; Reversals: process, time scale, magnetostratigraphy; Rock and mineral magnetismen
dc.titleHow fast was the Matuyama-Brunhes geomagnetic reversal? A new subcentennial record from the Sulmona Basin, central Italyen
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.description.pagenumber798-812en
dc.identifier.URLhttp://gji.oxfordjournals.org/content/204/2/798.full.pdf+htmlen
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.05. Geomagnetism::04.05.06. Paleomagnetismen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/gji/ggv486en
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico1A. Geomagnetismo e Paleomagnetismoen
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.description.fulltextrestricteden
dc.relation.issn0956-540Xen
dc.relation.eissn1365-246Xen
dc.contributor.authorSagnotti, L.en
dc.contributor.authorGiaccio, B.en
dc.contributor.authorLiddicoat, J. C.en
dc.contributor.authorNomade, S.en
dc.contributor.authorRenne, P. R.en
dc.contributor.authorScardia, G.en
dc.contributor.authorSprain, C. J.en
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentIGAG, CNRen
dc.contributor.departmentBarnard College, Columbia University, USAen
dc.contributor.departmentIPSL, CEA/CNRS/UVSQ et Universit´e Paris–Saclay, Franceen
dc.contributor.departmentBerkeley Geochronology Center, Berkeley, USAen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Brazilen
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptCNR - IGAG-
crisitem.author.deptBarnard College, Columbia University, USA-
crisitem.author.deptCNRS UMR 719-
crisitem.author.deptBerkeley Geochronology Center, Berkeley, CA, U.S.A.-
crisitem.author.deptInstituto Oceanográfico, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-3944-201X-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
Sagnotti et al 2016 Geophys J Int-798-812.pdfMain article9.15 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

31
checked on Feb 10, 2021

Page view(s) 20

300
checked on Apr 13, 2024

Download(s) 50

82
checked on Apr 13, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric