Setting up an earthquake forecast experiment in Italy
Author(s)
Language
English
Obiettivo Specifico
4.2. TTC - Modelli per la stima della pericolosità sismica a scala nazionale
5.1. TTC - Banche dati e metodi macrosismici
5.2. TTC - Banche dati di sismologia strumentale
Status
Published
JCR Journal
JCR Journal
Journal
Issue/vol(year)
3/53 (2010)
Publisher
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia
Pages (printed)
1-9
Date Issued
2010
Alternative Location
Abstract
We describe the setting up of the first earthquake forecasting experiment
for Italy within the Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability
(CSEP). CSEP conducts rigorous and truly prospective forecast experiments
for different tectonic environments in several forecast testing centers around
the globe; forecasts are issued for a future period and also tested only against
future observations to avoid any possible bias. As such, experiments need to
be completely defined. This includes exact definitions of the testing area, of
learning data for the forecast models, and of observation data against which
forecasts will be tested to evaluate their performance. Here we present the
rules, as taken from the Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models experiment
and extended or changed for the Italian experiment. We also present
characterizations of learning and observational catalogs that describe
the completeness of these catalogs and illuminate inhomogeneities of
magnitudes between these catalogs. A particular focus lies on the stability
of earthquake recordings of the observational network. These catalog
investigations provide guidance for CSEP modelers for developing
earthquakes forecasts for submission to the forecast experiment in Italy.
for Italy within the Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability
(CSEP). CSEP conducts rigorous and truly prospective forecast experiments
for different tectonic environments in several forecast testing centers around
the globe; forecasts are issued for a future period and also tested only against
future observations to avoid any possible bias. As such, experiments need to
be completely defined. This includes exact definitions of the testing area, of
learning data for the forecast models, and of observation data against which
forecasts will be tested to evaluate their performance. Here we present the
rules, as taken from the Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models experiment
and extended or changed for the Italian experiment. We also present
characterizations of learning and observational catalogs that describe
the completeness of these catalogs and illuminate inhomogeneities of
magnitudes between these catalogs. A particular focus lies on the stability
of earthquake recordings of the observational network. These catalog
investigations provide guidance for CSEP modelers for developing
earthquakes forecasts for submission to the forecast experiment in Italy.
References
Albarello, D., R. Camassi and A. Rebez (2001). Detection of
space and time heterogeneity in the completeness of a
seismic catalog by a statistical approach: An application to
the Italian area, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 91, 1694-1703.
Amato, A., L. Badiali, M. Cattaneo, A. Delladio, F. Doumaz
and F.M. Mele (2006). The real-time earthquake monitoring
system in Italy, Géosciences (BRGM), 4, 70-75.
BSI Working Group (2002). Bollettino Sismico Italiano, 2002–
2009, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia,
Bologna; http://bollettinosismico.rm.ingv.it/.
Castello, B., G. Selvaggi, C. Chiarabba and A. Amato (2006).
CSI Catalogo della sismicità italiana 1981–2002, versione
1.1., INGV-CNT, Roma; http://csi.rm.ingv.it/.
Castello, B., M. Olivieri and G. Selvaggi (2007). Local and duration
magnitude determination for the Italian earthquake
catalog, 1981–2002, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 97, 128-139.
Chiarabba, C., L. Jovane and R.D. Stefano (2005). A new
view of Italian seismicity using 20 years of instrumental
recordings, Tectonophysics, 395, 251-268.
CPTI Working Group (2004). Catalogo Parametrico dei
Terremoti Italiani, versione 2004 (CPTI04), INGV,
Bologna; http://emidius.mi.ingv.it/CPTI04/.
Dziewonski, A.M., T.-A. Chou and J.H. Woodhouse (1981).
Determination of earthquake source parameters from
waveform data for studies of global and regional seismicity,
J. Geophys. Res., 86, 2825-2852.
Ekström, G., A.M. Dziewonski, N.N. Maternovskaya and M.
Nettles (2005). Global seismicity of 2003: centroidmomenttensor
solutions for 1087 earthquakes, Phys. Earth Planet.
Int., 148, 327-351.
Field, E.H. (2007). Overview of the working group for the
development of regional earthquake likelihood models
(RELM), Seismol. Res. Lett., 78, 7-16.
Gasperini, P., F. Bernardini, G. Valensise and E. Boschi (1999).
Defining seismogenic sources from historical earthquakes
felt reports, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 89, 94-110.
Godey, S., R. Bossu, J. Guilbert and G. Mazet-Roux (2006). The
Euro-Mediterranean bulletin: A comprehensive seismological
bulletin at regional scale, Seismol. Res. Lett.,
77, 460-474.
Gulia, L. (2010). Detection of quarry and mine-blast contamination
in European regional catalogues, Nat. Hazards,
53, 229-249.
Habermann, R.E. (1987). Man-made changes of seismicity
rates, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 77, 141-159.
ISIDe Working Group (2007). Italian Seismic Instrumental
and parametric Data-basE, INGV-CNT; http://iside.rm.
ingv.it/.
Mason, I.B. (2003). Binary Events, in: Forecast Verification.
A Practitioner's Guide in Atmospheric Science, edited by
I.T. Jolliffe and D.B. Stephenson, Wiley, Hoboken, 37-76.
Mele, F., L. Arcoraci, P. Battelli, M. Berardi, C. Castellano, G.
Lozzi, A. Marchetti, A. Nardi, M. Pirro and A. Rossi (2010).
Bollettino Sismico Italiano 2008, Quaderni di Geofisica,
85, INGV, Roma, 45 pp., ISSN 1590-2595.
Molchan, G.M. (1990). Strategies in strong earthquake prediction,
Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 61, 84-98.
Molchan, G.M. and Y.Y. Kagan (1992). Earthquake prediction
and its optimization, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 4823-4838.
MPS Working Group (2004). Redazione della mappa di
pericolosità sismica prevista dall’Ordinanza PCM 3274 del
20 marzo 2003, Rapporto conclusivo per il Dipartimento
della Protezione Civile, INGV, Milano-Roma, April 2004
(MPS04), 65 pp. + 5 appendices; http://zonesismiche.
mi.ingv.it.
Pondrelli, S., S. Salimbeni, G. Ekström, A. Morelli, P. Gasperini
and G. Vannucci (2006). The Italian CMT dataset from
1977 to the present, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 159, 286-303.
Rovida, A. and the CPTI Working Group (2008). Catalogo
Parametrico dei Terremoti Italiani, 1901-2006, versione 2008
(CPTI08), INGV, Milano-Pavia; http://www.cseptesting.
org/regions/italy.
Schorlemmer, D. and M. Gerstenberger (2007). RELM testing
center, Seismol. Res. Lett., 78, 30-36.
Schorlemmer, D. and J. Woessner (2008). Probability of detecting
an earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 98, 2103-2117.
Schorlemmer, D., M. Gerstenberger, S. Wiemer, D.D. Jackson
and D.A. Rhoades (2007). Earthquake likelihood model
testing, Seismol. Res. Lett., 78, 17-29.
Schorlemmer, D., F. Mele and W. Marzocchi (2010). A completeness
analysis of the national seismic network of Italy,
J. Geophys. Res., 115, B04308; doi: 10.1029/2008JB006097.
Sipkin, S.A., W.J. Person and B.W. Presgrave (2000). Earthquake
bulletins and catalogs at the USGS National
Earthquake Information Center, http://earthquake.usgs.
gov/regional/neic/neic_bulletins.php.
Stucchi, M., P. Albini, C. Mirto and A. Rebez (2004). Assessing
the completeness of Italian historical earthquake data,
Annals of Geophysics, 47 (2-3), 659-673.
Wessel, P. and W.H.F. Smith (1991). Free software helps map
and display data, Eos Trans. AGU, 72, 445-446.
Woessner, J. and S. Wiemer (2005). Assessing the quality of
earthquake catalogues: Estimating the magnitude of
completeness and its uncertainty, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.,
95, 684-698.
Zechar, J.D. and T. Jordan (2008). Testing alarm-based earthquake
predictions, Geophys. J. Int., 172, 715-724.
Zechar, J.D., M.C. Gerstenberger and D.A. Rhoades (2010).
Likelihood-based tests for evaluating space-rate-magnitude
earthquake forecasts, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 100,
1184-1195.
space and time heterogeneity in the completeness of a
seismic catalog by a statistical approach: An application to
the Italian area, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 91, 1694-1703.
Amato, A., L. Badiali, M. Cattaneo, A. Delladio, F. Doumaz
and F.M. Mele (2006). The real-time earthquake monitoring
system in Italy, Géosciences (BRGM), 4, 70-75.
BSI Working Group (2002). Bollettino Sismico Italiano, 2002–
2009, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia,
Bologna; http://bollettinosismico.rm.ingv.it/.
Castello, B., G. Selvaggi, C. Chiarabba and A. Amato (2006).
CSI Catalogo della sismicità italiana 1981–2002, versione
1.1., INGV-CNT, Roma; http://csi.rm.ingv.it/.
Castello, B., M. Olivieri and G. Selvaggi (2007). Local and duration
magnitude determination for the Italian earthquake
catalog, 1981–2002, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 97, 128-139.
Chiarabba, C., L. Jovane and R.D. Stefano (2005). A new
view of Italian seismicity using 20 years of instrumental
recordings, Tectonophysics, 395, 251-268.
CPTI Working Group (2004). Catalogo Parametrico dei
Terremoti Italiani, versione 2004 (CPTI04), INGV,
Bologna; http://emidius.mi.ingv.it/CPTI04/.
Dziewonski, A.M., T.-A. Chou and J.H. Woodhouse (1981).
Determination of earthquake source parameters from
waveform data for studies of global and regional seismicity,
J. Geophys. Res., 86, 2825-2852.
Ekström, G., A.M. Dziewonski, N.N. Maternovskaya and M.
Nettles (2005). Global seismicity of 2003: centroidmomenttensor
solutions for 1087 earthquakes, Phys. Earth Planet.
Int., 148, 327-351.
Field, E.H. (2007). Overview of the working group for the
development of regional earthquake likelihood models
(RELM), Seismol. Res. Lett., 78, 7-16.
Gasperini, P., F. Bernardini, G. Valensise and E. Boschi (1999).
Defining seismogenic sources from historical earthquakes
felt reports, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 89, 94-110.
Godey, S., R. Bossu, J. Guilbert and G. Mazet-Roux (2006). The
Euro-Mediterranean bulletin: A comprehensive seismological
bulletin at regional scale, Seismol. Res. Lett.,
77, 460-474.
Gulia, L. (2010). Detection of quarry and mine-blast contamination
in European regional catalogues, Nat. Hazards,
53, 229-249.
Habermann, R.E. (1987). Man-made changes of seismicity
rates, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 77, 141-159.
ISIDe Working Group (2007). Italian Seismic Instrumental
and parametric Data-basE, INGV-CNT; http://iside.rm.
ingv.it/.
Mason, I.B. (2003). Binary Events, in: Forecast Verification.
A Practitioner's Guide in Atmospheric Science, edited by
I.T. Jolliffe and D.B. Stephenson, Wiley, Hoboken, 37-76.
Mele, F., L. Arcoraci, P. Battelli, M. Berardi, C. Castellano, G.
Lozzi, A. Marchetti, A. Nardi, M. Pirro and A. Rossi (2010).
Bollettino Sismico Italiano 2008, Quaderni di Geofisica,
85, INGV, Roma, 45 pp., ISSN 1590-2595.
Molchan, G.M. (1990). Strategies in strong earthquake prediction,
Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 61, 84-98.
Molchan, G.M. and Y.Y. Kagan (1992). Earthquake prediction
and its optimization, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 4823-4838.
MPS Working Group (2004). Redazione della mappa di
pericolosità sismica prevista dall’Ordinanza PCM 3274 del
20 marzo 2003, Rapporto conclusivo per il Dipartimento
della Protezione Civile, INGV, Milano-Roma, April 2004
(MPS04), 65 pp. + 5 appendices; http://zonesismiche.
mi.ingv.it.
Pondrelli, S., S. Salimbeni, G. Ekström, A. Morelli, P. Gasperini
and G. Vannucci (2006). The Italian CMT dataset from
1977 to the present, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 159, 286-303.
Rovida, A. and the CPTI Working Group (2008). Catalogo
Parametrico dei Terremoti Italiani, 1901-2006, versione 2008
(CPTI08), INGV, Milano-Pavia; http://www.cseptesting.
org/regions/italy.
Schorlemmer, D. and M. Gerstenberger (2007). RELM testing
center, Seismol. Res. Lett., 78, 30-36.
Schorlemmer, D. and J. Woessner (2008). Probability of detecting
an earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 98, 2103-2117.
Schorlemmer, D., M. Gerstenberger, S. Wiemer, D.D. Jackson
and D.A. Rhoades (2007). Earthquake likelihood model
testing, Seismol. Res. Lett., 78, 17-29.
Schorlemmer, D., F. Mele and W. Marzocchi (2010). A completeness
analysis of the national seismic network of Italy,
J. Geophys. Res., 115, B04308; doi: 10.1029/2008JB006097.
Sipkin, S.A., W.J. Person and B.W. Presgrave (2000). Earthquake
bulletins and catalogs at the USGS National
Earthquake Information Center, http://earthquake.usgs.
gov/regional/neic/neic_bulletins.php.
Stucchi, M., P. Albini, C. Mirto and A. Rebez (2004). Assessing
the completeness of Italian historical earthquake data,
Annals of Geophysics, 47 (2-3), 659-673.
Wessel, P. and W.H.F. Smith (1991). Free software helps map
and display data, Eos Trans. AGU, 72, 445-446.
Woessner, J. and S. Wiemer (2005). Assessing the quality of
earthquake catalogues: Estimating the magnitude of
completeness and its uncertainty, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.,
95, 684-698.
Zechar, J.D. and T. Jordan (2008). Testing alarm-based earthquake
predictions, Geophys. J. Int., 172, 715-724.
Zechar, J.D., M.C. Gerstenberger and D.A. Rhoades (2010).
Likelihood-based tests for evaluating space-rate-magnitude
earthquake forecasts, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 100,
1184-1195.
Type
article
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
4844-6145-1-PB.pdf
Size
9.23 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
da61b8768b1327908dabf2c130988ffc
