Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Affiliation
  3. INGV
  4. Article published / in press
  5. Earthquakes Parameters from Citizen Testimonies: A Retrospective Analysis of EMSC Database
 
  • Details

Earthquakes Parameters from Citizen Testimonies: A Retrospective Analysis of EMSC Database

Author(s)
Vannucci, Gianfranco  
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia  
Gasperini, Paolo  
Gulia, Laura  
Lolli, Barbara  
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia  
Language
English
Obiettivo Specifico
OST4 Descrizione in tempo reale del terremoto, del maremoto, loro predicibilità e impatto
Status
Published
JCR Journal
JCR Journal
Peer review journal
Yes
Journal
Seismological Research Letters  
Issue/vol(year)
2A/95 (2024)
ISSN
0895-0695
Publisher
Seismological Society of America
Pages (printed)
969–996
Date Issued
2024
DOI
10.1785/0220230245
URI
https://www.earth-prints.org/handle/2122/16698
Abstract
We aim to compute macroseismic parameters (location and magnitude) using the BOXER
code for the first time on the citizen testimonies, that is, individual intensity data points
(IDPs) at the global scale collected and made available by the LastQuake system of the
European–Mediterranean Seismological Centre (EMSC). IDPs available for different earthquakes
are selected to eliminate those that are geographically inconsistent with most
data; then they are clustered spatially based on various methods. For each cluster with
at least three IDPs, a macroseismic data point (MDP), corresponding to an intensity value
assessed for given localities as in classical macroseismic studies, is computed by various
central tendency estimators (average, median, and trimmed averages). Finally, macroseismic
parameters are obtained by MDP distribution using two location methods of BOXER
code. For each earthquake, we used raw and corrected intensities and 132 different combinations
of grouping methods, estimators, and BOXER methods. We assigned a ranking
to the combinations that best reproduce instrumental parameters and used such a ranking
to select preferred combinations for each earthquake. We analyzed retrospectively
the reliability of the parameters as a function of time and space. The results are essentially
identical using original and corrected intensities and show higher reliability for BOXER’s
method 1 than for method 0; they are dependent on the geographical area, and generally
improve over time and with the number of IDPs collected. These findings are useful for
the future real-time analyses, and for evaluating the location and magnitude of earthquakes
whenever a sufficient number of IDPs are available and with a distribution such
that MDPs can be derived and the BOXER method applied.
Type
article
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

srl-2023245.1.pdf

Description
Restricted Paper
Size

20.36 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

F29F4822B05988B56B6E2613EFD4C190

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

Supplementary_material_r3.docx

Size

3.51 MB

Format

Microsoft Word XML

Checksum (MD5)

a0110efcad0e146863b05a96fc0fb99b

rome library|catania library|milano library|napoli library|pisa library|palermo library
Explore By
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
Info
  • Earth-Prints Open Archive Brochure
  • Earth-Prints Archive Policy
  • Why should you use Earth-prints?
Earth-prints working group
⚬Anna Grazia Chiodetti (Project Leader)
⚬Gabriele Ferrara (Technical and Editorial Assistant)
⚬Massimiliano Cascone
⚬Francesca Leone
⚬Salvatore Barba
⚬Emmanuel Baroux
⚬Roberto Basili
⚬Paolo Marco De Martini

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback