#IStayhome and Guarantee Seismic Surveillance and Tsunami Warning during the COVID-19 Emergency in Italy
Author(s)
Language
English
Obiettivo Specifico
8T. Sismologia in tempo reale e Early Warning Sismico e da Tsunami
Status
Published
JCR Journal
JCR Journal
Peer review journal
Yes
Journal
Issue/vol(year)
1/92 (2021)
ISSN
0895-0695
Publisher
SSA
Pages (printed)
53–59
Date Issued
2021
Subjects
Earthquake monitoring
Seismic surveillance
Tsunami warning
Covid-19
Abstract
The continuity of monitoring operations at national earthquake centers during crisis is
an important challenge. In 2020, because of the COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
health emergency, monitoring centers all over the world faced new, unexpected problems.
In Italy, the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV) has the duty to
perform earthquake and volcano monitoring, seismic surveillance and tsunami alerting,
and maintaining effective communication with the National Civil Protection agency and
the public. During the lockdown, that started on 9 March 2020, INGV set up a series of
sanitary and organizational measures and improved the technological infrastructures in
the control room in Rome for remote use of software for seismic network monitoring,
seismic surveillance, and tsunami alerting. Our main goal was to protect the researchers
and technicians on duty as much as possible and develop the remote use of software
tools necessary to perform service activities when needed to limit the presence in the
control room to the essential.
In the first month of lockdown, we implemented the organizational controls, the
health aids, and the tools for remote surveillance and alerting, and gave online training
courses for about 100 shift workers. At the end of March 2020, most of the technicians,
researchers, and tsunami experts on duty were able to access the new monitoring tools
from home. During these months, the shifts in the control room were done in person
and we performed remote seismic surveillance and tsunami alerting only during the
weekly disinfections of the control room and at the beginning of each week. The tools
developed during the COVID health emergency are going to be useful in the future
especially in the case of other emergencies including the occurrence of a strong earthquake.
an important challenge. In 2020, because of the COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
health emergency, monitoring centers all over the world faced new, unexpected problems.
In Italy, the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV) has the duty to
perform earthquake and volcano monitoring, seismic surveillance and tsunami alerting,
and maintaining effective communication with the National Civil Protection agency and
the public. During the lockdown, that started on 9 March 2020, INGV set up a series of
sanitary and organizational measures and improved the technological infrastructures in
the control room in Rome for remote use of software for seismic network monitoring,
seismic surveillance, and tsunami alerting. Our main goal was to protect the researchers
and technicians on duty as much as possible and develop the remote use of software
tools necessary to perform service activities when needed to limit the presence in the
control room to the essential.
In the first month of lockdown, we implemented the organizational controls, the
health aids, and the tools for remote surveillance and alerting, and gave online training
courses for about 100 shift workers. At the end of March 2020, most of the technicians,
researchers, and tsunami experts on duty were able to access the new monitoring tools
from home. During these months, the shifts in the control room were done in person
and we performed remote seismic surveillance and tsunami alerting only during the
weekly disinfections of the control room and at the beginning of each week. The tools
developed during the COVID health emergency are going to be useful in the future
especially in the case of other emergencies including the occurrence of a strong earthquake.
Sponsors
This article has benefited
from funding provided by project FISR S.O.I.R. monitoraggio
futuro (CUP D83B17000000001) and by the Italian Presidenza del
Consiglio dei Ministri—Dipartimento della Protezione Civile
(DPC). This article does not necessarily represent DPC official opinion
and policies.
from funding provided by project FISR S.O.I.R. monitoraggio
futuro (CUP D83B17000000001) and by the Italian Presidenza del
Consiglio dei Ministri—Dipartimento della Protezione Civile
(DPC). This article does not necessarily represent DPC official opinion
and policies.
References
Amato, A. (2020). Some reflections on tsunami early warning systems
and their impact, with a look at the NEAMTWS, Boll. Geof. Teor.
Appl. 61, doi: 10.4430/bgta0329.
Bernardi, F., A. Lomax, A. Michelini, V. Lauciani, A. Piatanesi, and S.
Lorito (2015). Appraising the 30 Early-est earthquake monitoring
system for tsunami alerting at the Italian Candidate Tsunami service
provider, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 15, no. 9, 2019–2036,
doi: 10.5194/nhess-15-2019-2015.
Bono, A. (2008). Sispick 2.0 Sistema interattivo per l’analisi di segnali
sismici, Rapporti Tecnici INGV n. 59, Istituto Nazionale di
Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Italy (in Italian).
Bono, A., C. Marcocci, and S. Pintore (2016) SeisBook: Il sistema di
gestione per l’archivio degli eventi sismici della sala operativa
INGV di Roma, Rapporti Tecnici INGV n. 357 Istituto
Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Italy (in Italian).
Bono, A., S. Pintore, and V. Lauciani (2019). JET Java Estimate
Tsunami. Sistema di analisi interattiva di mareogrammi per il
Centro Allerta Tsunami, Rapporti Tecnici INGV n. 408 Istituto
Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Italy (in Italian).
Hellman, S., P. Friberg, E. Thomas, and E. Hauksson (2001).
SeisNetWatch—A three-tiered data collection network monitoring
and control tool for Solaris, Linux and Windows NT, AGU Fall
Meeting Abstracts, American Geophysical Union, Abstract
Number S11B-0560.
Johnson, C. E., A. Bittenbinder, B. Bogaert, L. Dietz, and W. Kohler
(1995). Earthworm: A flexible approach to seismic network
processing, IRIS Newslett. 14, 4.
Mazza, S., A. Basili, A. Bono, V. Lauciani, A. Mandiello, C. Marcocci,
F. M. Mele, S. Pintore, M. Quintiliani, L. Scognamiglio, and G.
Selvaggi (2012). AIDA—Seismic data acquisition, processing, storage
and distribution at the National Earthquake Center, INGV,
Ann. Geophys. 55, no. 4, doi: 10.4401/ag-6145.
Michelini, A., L. Margheriti, M. Cattaneo, G. Cecere, G. D’Anna, A.
Delladio, M. Moretti, S. Pintore, A. Amato, A. Basili, et al. (2016).
The Italian National Seismic Network and the earthquake and tsunami
monitoring and surveillance systems, Adv. Geosci. 43, 31–38,
doi: 10.5194/adgeo-43-31-2016.
Pintore, S., C. Marcocci, A. Bono, V. Lauciani, and M. Quintiliani
(2012). Seisface: Interfaccia di gestione delle informazioni della
rete sismica nazionale centralizzata, Rapporti Tecnici INGV
ISSN 2039-7941, N. 218, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e
Vulcanologia, Italy (in Italian).
Quintiliani, M., and S. Pintore (2013). Mole: An open near real-time
database-centric Earthworm subsystem, Seismol. Res. Lett. 84,
no. 4, 695–701, doi: 10.1785/0220120066.
Richardson, T., Q. Stafford-Fraser, K. R. Wood, and A. Hopper
(1998). Virtual network computing, IEEE Int. Comput. 2, no. 1,
33–38, doi: 10.1109/4236.656066.
Wendel, J. (2020). How routine monitors weather the pandemic
storm, Eos 101, doi: 10.1029/2020EO144036.
and their impact, with a look at the NEAMTWS, Boll. Geof. Teor.
Appl. 61, doi: 10.4430/bgta0329.
Bernardi, F., A. Lomax, A. Michelini, V. Lauciani, A. Piatanesi, and S.
Lorito (2015). Appraising the 30 Early-est earthquake monitoring
system for tsunami alerting at the Italian Candidate Tsunami service
provider, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 15, no. 9, 2019–2036,
doi: 10.5194/nhess-15-2019-2015.
Bono, A. (2008). Sispick 2.0 Sistema interattivo per l’analisi di segnali
sismici, Rapporti Tecnici INGV n. 59, Istituto Nazionale di
Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Italy (in Italian).
Bono, A., C. Marcocci, and S. Pintore (2016) SeisBook: Il sistema di
gestione per l’archivio degli eventi sismici della sala operativa
INGV di Roma, Rapporti Tecnici INGV n. 357 Istituto
Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Italy (in Italian).
Bono, A., S. Pintore, and V. Lauciani (2019). JET Java Estimate
Tsunami. Sistema di analisi interattiva di mareogrammi per il
Centro Allerta Tsunami, Rapporti Tecnici INGV n. 408 Istituto
Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Italy (in Italian).
Hellman, S., P. Friberg, E. Thomas, and E. Hauksson (2001).
SeisNetWatch—A three-tiered data collection network monitoring
and control tool for Solaris, Linux and Windows NT, AGU Fall
Meeting Abstracts, American Geophysical Union, Abstract
Number S11B-0560.
Johnson, C. E., A. Bittenbinder, B. Bogaert, L. Dietz, and W. Kohler
(1995). Earthworm: A flexible approach to seismic network
processing, IRIS Newslett. 14, 4.
Mazza, S., A. Basili, A. Bono, V. Lauciani, A. Mandiello, C. Marcocci,
F. M. Mele, S. Pintore, M. Quintiliani, L. Scognamiglio, and G.
Selvaggi (2012). AIDA—Seismic data acquisition, processing, storage
and distribution at the National Earthquake Center, INGV,
Ann. Geophys. 55, no. 4, doi: 10.4401/ag-6145.
Michelini, A., L. Margheriti, M. Cattaneo, G. Cecere, G. D’Anna, A.
Delladio, M. Moretti, S. Pintore, A. Amato, A. Basili, et al. (2016).
The Italian National Seismic Network and the earthquake and tsunami
monitoring and surveillance systems, Adv. Geosci. 43, 31–38,
doi: 10.5194/adgeo-43-31-2016.
Pintore, S., C. Marcocci, A. Bono, V. Lauciani, and M. Quintiliani
(2012). Seisface: Interfaccia di gestione delle informazioni della
rete sismica nazionale centralizzata, Rapporti Tecnici INGV
ISSN 2039-7941, N. 218, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e
Vulcanologia, Italy (in Italian).
Quintiliani, M., and S. Pintore (2013). Mole: An open near real-time
database-centric Earthworm subsystem, Seismol. Res. Lett. 84,
no. 4, 695–701, doi: 10.1785/0220120066.
Richardson, T., Q. Stafford-Fraser, K. R. Wood, and A. Hopper
(1998). Virtual network computing, IEEE Int. Comput. 2, no. 1,
33–38, doi: 10.1109/4236.656066.
Wendel, J. (2020). How routine monitors weather the pandemic
storm, Eos 101, doi: 10.1029/2020EO144036.
Type
article
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
Margheritietal_reviews_editor_changes_Final.pdf
Size
117.25 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
9fad37baf354b4a2004fb146edcc51f2
Loading...
Name
IstayHome.jpeg
Size
420.57 KB
Format
JPEG
Checksum (MD5)
3552d92177bc5b5fec9dfb6826ac5aab
