The 2013 European Seismic Hazard Model: key components and results
Author(s)
The SHARE Consortium
Language
English
Obiettivo Specifico
3T. Pericolosità sismica e contributo alla definizione del rischio
Status
Published
JCR Journal
JCR Journal
Peer review journal
Yes
Issue/vol(year)
12/13(2015)
ISSN
1570-761X
Electronic ISSN
1573-1456
Publisher
Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Pages (printed)
3553-3596
Date Issued
December 2015
Alternative Location
Abstract
The 2013 European Seismic Hazard Model (ESHM13) results from a community-based probabilistic seismic hazard assessment supported by the EU-FP7 project “Seismic Hazard Harmonization in Europe” (SHARE, 2009–2013). The ESHM13 is a consistent seismic hazard model for Europe and Turkey which overcomes the limitation of national borders and includes a through quantification of the uncertainties. It is the first completed regional effort contributing to the “Global Earthquake Model” initiative. It might serve as a reference model for various applications, from earthquake preparedness to earthquake risk mitigation strategies, including the update of the European seismic regulations for building design (Eurocode 8), and thus it is useful for future safety assessment and improvement of private and public buildings. Although its results constitute a reference for Europe, they do not replace the existing national design regulations that are in place for seismic design and construction of buildings. The ESHM13 represents a significant improvement compared to previous efforts as it is based on (1) the compilation of updated and harmonised versions of the databases required for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment, (2) the adoption of standard procedures and robust methods, especially for expert elicitation and consensus building among hundreds of European experts, (3) the multi-disciplinary input from all branches of earthquake science and engineering, (4) the direct involvement of the CEN/TC250/SC8 committee in defining output specifications relevant for Eurocode 8 and (5) the accounting for epistemic uncertainties of model components and hazard results. Furthermore, enormous effort was devoted to transparently document and ensure open availability of all data, results and methods through the European Facility for Earthquake Hazard and Risk (www.efehr.org).
References
Akkar S, Bommer JJ (2010) Empirical equations for the prediction of PGA, PGV, and spectral accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean Region, and the Middle East. Seismol Res Lett 81:195–206. doi:10.1785/gssrl.81.2.195
CrossRef
Akkar S, Sandıkkaya MA, Şenyurt M et al (2013) Reference database for seismic ground-motion in Europe (RESORCE). Bull Earthq Eng 12:311–339. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9506-8
CrossRef
Anderson JG, Luco JE (1983) Consequences of slip rate constraints on earthquake occurrence relations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73:471–496
Arvidsson R, Grünthal G (2010) SHARE D3.1—compilation of existing regional and national seismic source zones. Bruxelles
Asch K (2005) The 1:5 million International Geological Map of Europe and adjacent areas. In: BGR, Hann. http://www.bgr.de/karten/igme5000/igme5000.htm
Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2003) Empirical ground-motion relations for subduction-zone earthquakes and their application to Cascadia and other regions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:1703–1729
CrossRef
Basili R, Kastelic V, Valensise G, Group and the DW (2009) DISS3 tutorial series: guidelines for compiling records of the database of the individual seismogenic sources, version 3. INGV
Basili R, Valensise G, Vannoli P et al (2008) The Database of Individual Seismogenic Sources (DISS), version 3: summarizing 20 years of research on Italy’s earthquake geology. Tectonophysics 453:20–43. doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2007.04.014
CrossRef
Basili R, Tiberti MM, Kastelic V et al (2013) Integrating geologic fault data into tsunami hazard studies. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:1025–1050. doi:10.5194/nhess-13-1025-2013
CrossRef
Bassin C, Laske G, Masters G (2000) The current limits of resolution for surface wave tomography. EOS Trans AGU 81:F987
Beauval C, Bard P-Y, Hainzl S, Gueguen P (2008) Can strong-motion observations be used to constrain probabilistic seismic-hazard estimates? Bull Seismol Soc Am 98:509–520. doi:10.1785/0120070006
CrossRef
Berryman K, Wallace L, Hayes G, et al. (2013) The GEM faulted earth subduction characterisation project (version 1.0)
Bird P (2003) An updated digital model of plate boundaries. Geochem. Geophys Geosyst 4:n/a–n/a. doi:10.1029/2001GC000252
Bisch P, Carvalho E, Degree H et al (2011) Eurocode 8: seismic design of buildings worked examples. doi:10.2788/91658
Bommer JJ, Scherbaum F (2008) The use and misuse of logic trees in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Earthq Spectra 24:997–1009. doi:10.1193/1.2977755
CrossRef
Bommer JJ, Douglas J, Scherbaum F et al (2010) On the selection of ground-motion prediction equations for seismic hazard analysis. Seismol Res Lett 81:783–793. doi:10.1785/gssrl.81.5.783
CrossRef
Budnitz RJ, Apostolakis G, Boore DM et al (1997) Recommendations for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: guidance on uncertainty and use of experts. Report NUREG/CR-6372, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, sponsored by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, U.S. Department of Energy, and Electric Power Research Institute
Bungum H (2007) Numerical modelling of fault activities. Comput Geosci 33:808–820. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2006.10.011
CrossRef
Burkhard M, Grünthal G (2009) Seismic source zone characterization for the seismic hazard assessment project PEGASOS by the Expert Group 2 (EG1b). Swiss J Geosci 102:149–188. doi:10.1007/s00015-009-1307-3
CrossRef
Campbell KW (2003) Prediction of strong ground motion using the hybrid empirical method and its use in the development of ground-motion (attenuation) relations in eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:1012–1033. doi:10.1785/0120020002
CrossRef
Caputo R, Chatzipetros A, Pavlides S, Sboras S (2012) Active tectonics around the Mediterranean The Greek Database of Seismogenic Sources (GreDaSS): state-of-the-art for northern Greece. Ann Geophys. doi:10.4401/ag-5168
Caputo R, Chatzipetros A, Pavlides S, Sboras S (2013) The Greek Database of Seismogenic Sources (GreDaSS): state-of-the-art for northern Greece. Ann Geophys. doi:10.4401/ag-5168
Cauzzi C, Faccioli E (2008) Broadband (0.05 to 20 s) prediction of displacement response spectra based on worldwide digital records. J Seismol 12:453–475. doi:10.1007/s10950-008-9098-y
CrossRef
CEN (2004) CEN—Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, EN 1998-1. Brussels, Belgium
Chiou BSJ, Youngs RR (2008) An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthq Spectra 24:173–215. doi:10.1193/1.2894832
CrossRef
Coppersmith KJ, Salomone LA, Fuller CW et al (2012) Technical report: central and eastern United States seismic source characterization for nuclear facilities, chapter 5. Palo Alto, CA, USA
Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58:1583–1606
Cotton F, Scherbaum F, Bommer JJ, Bungum H (2006) Criteria for selecting and adjusting ground-motion models for specific target regions: application to central Europe and rock sites. J Seismol 10:137–156. doi:10.1007/s10950-005-9006-7
CrossRef
Delavaud E, Cotton F, Akkar S et al (2012) Toward a ground-motion logic tree for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Europe. J Seismol 16:451–473. doi:10.1007/s10950-012-9281-z
CrossRef
Demircioglu M, Siyahi B, Erdik M et al (2004) Earthquake hazard in Marmara Region, Turkey. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24:605–631. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.04.003
CrossRef
DISS Working Group (2010) Database of Individual Seismogenic Sources (DISS). doi:10.6092/INGV.IT-DISS3.1.1
Dominique P, Andre E (2012) Probabilistic seismic hazard map on the French national territory. In: Proceedings of 12 world conference on earthquake engineering
Dziewonski AM, Chou T-A, Woodhouse JH (1981) Determination of earthquake source parameters from waveform data for studies of global and regional seismicity. J Geophys Res 86:2825. doi:10.1029/JB086iB04p02825
CrossRef
Edwards B, Fäh D (2013) A stochastic ground-motion model for Switzerland. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103:78–98. doi:10.1785/0120110331
CrossRef
England P, Jackson J (2011) Uncharted seismic risk. Nat Geosci 4:348–349. doi:10.1038/ngeo1168
CrossRef
Ergintav S, Reilinger RE, Çakmak R et al (2014) Istanbul’s earthquake hot spots: geodetic constraints on strain accumulation along faults in the Marmara seismic gap. Geophys Res Lett 41:5783–5788. doi:10.1002/2014GL060985
CrossRef
Faccioli E, Bianchini A, Villani M (2010) New ground motion prediction equations for t > 1 s and their influence on seismic hazard assessment. In: Proceedings of the University of Tokyo symposium on long-period ground motion and urban disaster mitigation
Field EH, Dawson TE, Felzer KR et al (2009) Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 2 (UCERF 2). Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:2053–2107. doi:10.1785/0120080049
CrossRef
Fonseca JFBD (2006) The source of the Lisbon earthquake. Science 308:50–51
CrossRef
Frankel A (1995) Mapping seismic hazard in the central and eastern United States. Seismol Res Lett 66:8
CrossRef
Frankel AD, Petersen MD, Mueller CS, et al. (2002) Documentation for the 2002 update of the national seismic hazard maps
Garcia D, Wald DJ, Hearne MG (2012) A global earthquake discrimination scheme to optimize ground-motion prediction equation selection. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102:185–203. doi:10.1785/0120110124
CrossRef
Garcia-Mayordomo J, Insua-Arévalo JM, Martínez-Díaz JJ et al (2012) The Quaternary Active Faults Database of Iberia (QAFI v. 2.0). J Iber Geol 38:285–302
CrossRef
Giardini D (1999) The Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program (GSHAP)—1992/1999. Ann di Geofis 42:957–974. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3121.1992.tb00609.x
Giardini D, Woessner J, Danciu L et al (2013a) Seismic Hazard Harmonization in Europe (SHARE): online data resource. doi:10.12686/SED-00000001-SHARE
Giardini D, Woessner J, Danciu L et al (2013b) SHARE European seismic hazard map for peak ground acceleration, 10 % exceedance probability in 50 years. doi:10.2777/30345
Giardini D, Woessner J, Danciu L (2014) Mapping Europe’s seismic hazard. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 95:261–268. doi:10.1002/2014EO29
CrossRef
Gomez-Capera AA, Rovida A, Gasperini P et al (2014) The determination of earthquake location and magnitude from macroseismic data in Europe. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9672-3
Grünthal G, GSHAP Working Group Region 3 (1999) Seismic hazard assessment for Central, North and Northwest Europe: GSHAP Region 3. Ann di Geofis 42
Grünthal G, Wahlström R (2000) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (horizontal PGA) for Sweden, Finland and Denmark using different logic tree approaches. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 20:45–58
CrossRef
Grünthal G, Wahlström R (2012) The European-Mediterranean Earthquake Catalogue (EMEC) for the last millennium. J Seismol 16:535–570. doi:10.1007/s10950-012-9302-y
CrossRef
Grünthal G, Mayer-Rosa D, Lenhardt W (1998) Abschätzung der Erdbebengefährdung für die D-A-CH-Staaten. Bautechnik 75:753–767
CrossRef
Grünthal G, Wahlström R, Stromeyer D (2013) The SHARE European Earthquake Catalogue (SHEEC) for the time period 1900–2006 and its comparison to the European-Mediterranean Earthquake Catalogue (EMEC). J Seismol 17:1339–1344. doi:10.1007/s10950-013-9379-y
CrossRef
Haller KM, Basili R (2011) Developing seismogenic source models based on geologic fault data. Seismol Res Lett 82:519–525. doi:10.1785/gssrl.82.4.519
CrossRef
Hanks TC, Bakun WH (2002) A bilinear source-scaling model for M-log A observations of continental earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:1841–1846. doi:10.1785/0120010148
CrossRef
Hiemer S, Jackson DD, Wang Q et al (2013) A stochastic forecast of California earthquakes based on fault slip and smoothed seismicity. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103:799–810. doi:10.1785/0120120168
CrossRef
Hiemer S, Woessner J, Basili R et al (2014) A kernel-smoothed stochastic earthquake rate model considering seismicity and fault moment release for Europe. Geophys J Int 198:in review. doi:10.1093/gji/ggu186
Holschneider M, Zöller G, Clements R, Schorlemmer D (2014) Can we test for the maximum possible earthquake magnitude? J Geophys Res Solid Earth. doi:10.1002/2013JB010319
Jimenez MJ, Giardini D, Grünthal G et al (2001) Unified seismic hazard modelling throughout the Mediterranean region. Boll Di Geofis Teor Ed Appl 42:3–18
Johnston AC, Coppersmith KJ, Kanter LR, Cornell CA (1994) The earthquakes of stable continental regions, volume 1: assessment of large earthquake potential. Electric Power Research Institute, USA
Kagan YY (2002) Aftershock zone scaling. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:641–655. doi:10.1785/0120010172
CrossRef
Kagan YY, Jackson DD, Geller RJ (2012) Characteristic earthquake model, 1884–2011, R.I.P. Seismol Res Lett 83:951–953. doi:10.1785/0220120107
CrossRef
Krammerer AM, Ake JP (2011) Practical implementation guidelines for SSHAC level 3 and 4 hazard studies (NUREG-2117)
Kulkarni RB, Youngs RR, Coppersmith KJ (1984) Assessment of confidence intervals for results of seismic hazard analysis. In: Proceedings of the eighth world conference on earthquake engineering, San Francisco, pp 263–270
Lemoine A, Douglas J, Cotton F (2012) Testing the applicability of correlations between topographic slope and vs30 for Europe. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102:2585–2599. doi:10.1785/0120110240
CrossRef
Leonard M (2010) Earthquake fault scaling: self-consistent relating of rupture length, width, average displacement, and moment release. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100:1971–1988. doi:10.1785/0120090189
CrossRef
Lin P-S, Lee C-T (2008) Ground-motion attenuation relationships for subduction-zone earthquakes in northeastern Taiwan. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98:220–240. doi:10.1785/0120060002
CrossRef
Locati M, Rovida A, Albini P, Stucchi M (2014) The AHEAD portal: a gateway to European historical earthquake data. Seismol Res Lett 85:727–734. doi:10.1785/0220130113
CrossRef
Meletti C, Galadini F, Valensise G et al (2008) A seismic source zone model for the seismic hazard assessment of the Italian territory. Tectonophysics 450:85–108. doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2008.01.003
CrossRef
Melletti C, D’Amico V, Martinelli F (2009) SHARE D3.3—homogeneous assessment of the maximum magnitude. Brusselles
Müller RD, Sdrolias M, Gaina C, Roest WR (2008) Age, spreading rates, and spreading asymmetry of the world’s ocean crust. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 9:n/a–n/a. doi:10.1029/2007GC001743
Musson RMW (1999) Probabilistic seismic hazard maps for the north Balkan region. Ann Geophys 42:1109–1124
Musson RMW (2000) Generalised seismic hazard maps for the pannonian basin using probabilistic methods. Pure Appl Geophys 157:147–169. doi:10.1007/PL00001092
CrossRef
Musson RMW (2012) Interpreting intraplate tectonics for seismic hazard: a UK historical perspective. J Seismol 16:261–273. doi:10.1007/s10950-011-9268-1
CrossRef
Musson RMW, Sellami S, Brüstle W (2009) Preparing a seismic hazard model for Switzerland: the view from PEGASOS Expert Group 3 (EG1c). Swiss J Geosci 102:107–120. doi:10.1007/s00015-008-1301-1
CrossRef
Pagani M, Monelli D, Weatherill G et al (2014) OpenQuake Engine: an open hazard (and risk) software for the Global Earthquake Model. Seismol Res Lett 85:692–702. doi:10.1785/0220130087
CrossRef
Papaioannou CA, Papazachos BC (2010) Time-independent and time-dependent seismic hazard in Greece based on seismogenic sources. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90:22–33
CrossRef
Pavlides S, Caputo R, Sboras SP et al (2010) The Greek catalog if active faults and database of seismogenic sources. Bull Geol Soc Greece 43:486–494
Pondrelli S, Morelli A, Ekström G et al (2002) European-Mediterranean regional centroid-moment tensors: 1997–2000. Phys Earth Planet Inter 130:71–101. doi:10.1016/S0031-9201(01)00312-0
CrossRef
Reiter L (1990) Earthquake hazard analysis: issues and insights. Columbia University Press, New York
Scherbaum F, Delavaud E, Riggelsen C (2009) Model selection in seismic hazard analysis: an information-theoretic perspective. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:3234–3247. doi:10.1785/0120080347
CrossRef
Schmid SM, Slejko D (2009) Seismic source characterization of the Alpine foreland in the context of a probabilistic seismic hazard analysis by PEGASOS Expert Group 1 (EG1a). Swiss J Geosci 102:121–148. doi:10.1007/s00015-008-1300-2
CrossRef
Schwartz DP, Coppersmith KJ (1984) Fault behavior and characteristic earthquakes: examples from the Wasatch and San Andreas fault zones. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 89:5681–5698
CrossRef
Siebert L, Simkin T (2002) Volcanoes of the world: an illustrated catalog of Holocene Volcanoes and their eruptions. Smithsonian Institution, Global Volcanism Program Digital Information Series, GVP-3. http://www.volcano.si.edu
Sleijko D, Peruzza L, Rebez A (1998) Seismic hazard maps of Italy. Ann Geophys 41:183–214
Sleijko D, Camassi R, Cecic I et al (1999) Seismic hazard assessment for Adria. Ann Geophys 42:1085–1107
Sokolov VY, Wenzel F, Mohindra R (2009) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Romania and sensitivity analysis: a case of joint consideration of intermediate-depth (Vrancea) and shallow (crustal) seismicity. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29:364–381. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.04.004
CrossRef
Sørensen MB, Stromeyer D, Grünthal G (2010) A macroseismic intensity prediction equation for intermediate depth earthquakes in the Vrancea region, Romania. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30:1268–1278. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.05.009
CrossRef
Spudich P, Chiou BSJ (2008) Directivity in NGA earthquake ground motions: analysis using isochrone theory. Earthq Spectra 24:279. doi:10.1193/1.2928225
CrossRef
Stirling MW, McVerry GH, Berryman KR (2002) A new seismic hazard model for New Zealand. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:1878–1903. doi:10.1785/0120010156
CrossRef
Stirling M, McVerry G, Gerstenberger M et al (2012) National seismic hazard model for New Zealand: 2010 update. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102:1514–1542. doi:10.1785/0120110170
CrossRef
Stiros SC (2010) The 8.5+ magnitude, AD365 earthquake in Crete: coastal uplift, topography changes, archaeological and historical signature. Quat Int 216:54–63. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2009.05.005
CrossRef
Strasser FO, Arango MC, Bommer JJ (2010) Scaling of the source dimensions of interface and intraslab subduction-zone earthquakes with moment magnitude. Seismol Res Lett 81:941–950. doi:10.1785/gssrl.81.6.941
CrossRef
Stucchi M, Meletti C, Montaldo V et al (2011) Seismic hazard assessment (2003–2009) for the Italian building code. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101:1885–1911. doi:10.1785/0120100130
CrossRef
Stucchi M, Rovida A, Gomez Capera AA et al (2012) The SHARE European Earthquake Catalogue (SHEEC) 1000–1899. J Seismol 17:523–544. doi:10.1007/s10950-012-9335-2
CrossRef
Toro GR, Abrahamson NA, Schneider JF (1997) Model of strong ground motions from earthquakes in central and eastern North America: best estimates and uncertainties. Seismol Res Lett 68:41–57. doi:10.1785/gssrl.68.1.41
CrossRef
Van Houtte C, Drouet S, Cotton F (2011) Analysis of the origins of (Kappa) to compute hard rock to rock adjustment factors for GMPEs. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101:2926–2941. doi:10.1785/0120100345
CrossRef
Vanneste K, Camelbeeck T, Verbeeck K (2013) A model of composite seismic sources for the lower Rhine Graben, northwest Europe. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103:984–1007. doi:10.1785/0120120037
CrossRef
Vilanova SP, Nemser ES, Besana-Ostman GM et al (2014) Incorporating descriptive metadata into seismic source zone models for seismic-hazard assessment: a case study of the Azores-West Iberian region. Bull Seismol Soc Am 104:1212–1229. doi:10.1785/0120130210
CrossRef
Weatherill G, Danciu L, Crowley H (2013) Future directions for seismic input in European design codes in the context of the seismic hazard harmonisation in Europe (SHARE) project. Vienna conference on earthquake engineering and structural dynamics pp 28–30
Weichert DH (1980) Estimation of the earthquake recurrence parameters for unequal observation periods. Bull Seismol Soc Am 70:1337–1346
Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:974–1002
Wheeler BRL (2009) Methods of M max estimation east of the rocky mountains. Open file report 2009-1018, USGS
Wheeler RL (2011) Reassessment of stable continental regions. Seismol Res Lett 82:141–143. doi:10.1785/gssrl
CrossRef
Wiemer S, García-Fernández M, Burg J-P (2009a) Development of a seismic source model for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of nuclear power plant sites in Switzerland: the view from PEGASOS Expert Group 4 (EG1d). Swiss J Geosci 102:189–209. doi:10.1007/s00015-009-1311-7
CrossRef
Wiemer S, Giardini D, Fäh D et al (2009b) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Switzerland: best estimates and uncertainties. J Seismol 13:449–478. doi:10.1007/s10950-008-9138-7
CrossRef
Yenier E, Sandikkaya MA, Akkar S (2010) SHARE D4.1—updated strong-ground motion database. Bruxelles
Youngs RR, Coppersmith KJ (1985) Implications of fault slip rates and earthquake recurrence models to probabilistic seismic hazard estimates. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75:939–964
Youngs RR, Chiou SJ, Silva WJ, Humphrey JR (1997) Strong ground motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett 68:58–73. doi:10.1785/gssrl.68.1.58
CrossRef
Zhao JX (2006) Attenuation relations of strong ground motion in Japan using site classification based on predominant period. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:898–913. doi:10.1785/0120050122
CrossRef
CrossRef
Akkar S, Sandıkkaya MA, Şenyurt M et al (2013) Reference database for seismic ground-motion in Europe (RESORCE). Bull Earthq Eng 12:311–339. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9506-8
CrossRef
Anderson JG, Luco JE (1983) Consequences of slip rate constraints on earthquake occurrence relations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73:471–496
Arvidsson R, Grünthal G (2010) SHARE D3.1—compilation of existing regional and national seismic source zones. Bruxelles
Asch K (2005) The 1:5 million International Geological Map of Europe and adjacent areas. In: BGR, Hann. http://www.bgr.de/karten/igme5000/igme5000.htm
Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2003) Empirical ground-motion relations for subduction-zone earthquakes and their application to Cascadia and other regions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:1703–1729
CrossRef
Basili R, Kastelic V, Valensise G, Group and the DW (2009) DISS3 tutorial series: guidelines for compiling records of the database of the individual seismogenic sources, version 3. INGV
Basili R, Valensise G, Vannoli P et al (2008) The Database of Individual Seismogenic Sources (DISS), version 3: summarizing 20 years of research on Italy’s earthquake geology. Tectonophysics 453:20–43. doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2007.04.014
CrossRef
Basili R, Tiberti MM, Kastelic V et al (2013) Integrating geologic fault data into tsunami hazard studies. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:1025–1050. doi:10.5194/nhess-13-1025-2013
CrossRef
Bassin C, Laske G, Masters G (2000) The current limits of resolution for surface wave tomography. EOS Trans AGU 81:F987
Beauval C, Bard P-Y, Hainzl S, Gueguen P (2008) Can strong-motion observations be used to constrain probabilistic seismic-hazard estimates? Bull Seismol Soc Am 98:509–520. doi:10.1785/0120070006
CrossRef
Berryman K, Wallace L, Hayes G, et al. (2013) The GEM faulted earth subduction characterisation project (version 1.0)
Bird P (2003) An updated digital model of plate boundaries. Geochem. Geophys Geosyst 4:n/a–n/a. doi:10.1029/2001GC000252
Bisch P, Carvalho E, Degree H et al (2011) Eurocode 8: seismic design of buildings worked examples. doi:10.2788/91658
Bommer JJ, Scherbaum F (2008) The use and misuse of logic trees in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Earthq Spectra 24:997–1009. doi:10.1193/1.2977755
CrossRef
Bommer JJ, Douglas J, Scherbaum F et al (2010) On the selection of ground-motion prediction equations for seismic hazard analysis. Seismol Res Lett 81:783–793. doi:10.1785/gssrl.81.5.783
CrossRef
Budnitz RJ, Apostolakis G, Boore DM et al (1997) Recommendations for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: guidance on uncertainty and use of experts. Report NUREG/CR-6372, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, sponsored by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, U.S. Department of Energy, and Electric Power Research Institute
Bungum H (2007) Numerical modelling of fault activities. Comput Geosci 33:808–820. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2006.10.011
CrossRef
Burkhard M, Grünthal G (2009) Seismic source zone characterization for the seismic hazard assessment project PEGASOS by the Expert Group 2 (EG1b). Swiss J Geosci 102:149–188. doi:10.1007/s00015-009-1307-3
CrossRef
Campbell KW (2003) Prediction of strong ground motion using the hybrid empirical method and its use in the development of ground-motion (attenuation) relations in eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:1012–1033. doi:10.1785/0120020002
CrossRef
Caputo R, Chatzipetros A, Pavlides S, Sboras S (2012) Active tectonics around the Mediterranean The Greek Database of Seismogenic Sources (GreDaSS): state-of-the-art for northern Greece. Ann Geophys. doi:10.4401/ag-5168
Caputo R, Chatzipetros A, Pavlides S, Sboras S (2013) The Greek Database of Seismogenic Sources (GreDaSS): state-of-the-art for northern Greece. Ann Geophys. doi:10.4401/ag-5168
Cauzzi C, Faccioli E (2008) Broadband (0.05 to 20 s) prediction of displacement response spectra based on worldwide digital records. J Seismol 12:453–475. doi:10.1007/s10950-008-9098-y
CrossRef
CEN (2004) CEN—Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, EN 1998-1. Brussels, Belgium
Chiou BSJ, Youngs RR (2008) An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthq Spectra 24:173–215. doi:10.1193/1.2894832
CrossRef
Coppersmith KJ, Salomone LA, Fuller CW et al (2012) Technical report: central and eastern United States seismic source characterization for nuclear facilities, chapter 5. Palo Alto, CA, USA
Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58:1583–1606
Cotton F, Scherbaum F, Bommer JJ, Bungum H (2006) Criteria for selecting and adjusting ground-motion models for specific target regions: application to central Europe and rock sites. J Seismol 10:137–156. doi:10.1007/s10950-005-9006-7
CrossRef
Delavaud E, Cotton F, Akkar S et al (2012) Toward a ground-motion logic tree for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Europe. J Seismol 16:451–473. doi:10.1007/s10950-012-9281-z
CrossRef
Demircioglu M, Siyahi B, Erdik M et al (2004) Earthquake hazard in Marmara Region, Turkey. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24:605–631. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.04.003
CrossRef
DISS Working Group (2010) Database of Individual Seismogenic Sources (DISS). doi:10.6092/INGV.IT-DISS3.1.1
Dominique P, Andre E (2012) Probabilistic seismic hazard map on the French national territory. In: Proceedings of 12 world conference on earthquake engineering
Dziewonski AM, Chou T-A, Woodhouse JH (1981) Determination of earthquake source parameters from waveform data for studies of global and regional seismicity. J Geophys Res 86:2825. doi:10.1029/JB086iB04p02825
CrossRef
Edwards B, Fäh D (2013) A stochastic ground-motion model for Switzerland. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103:78–98. doi:10.1785/0120110331
CrossRef
England P, Jackson J (2011) Uncharted seismic risk. Nat Geosci 4:348–349. doi:10.1038/ngeo1168
CrossRef
Ergintav S, Reilinger RE, Çakmak R et al (2014) Istanbul’s earthquake hot spots: geodetic constraints on strain accumulation along faults in the Marmara seismic gap. Geophys Res Lett 41:5783–5788. doi:10.1002/2014GL060985
CrossRef
Faccioli E, Bianchini A, Villani M (2010) New ground motion prediction equations for t > 1 s and their influence on seismic hazard assessment. In: Proceedings of the University of Tokyo symposium on long-period ground motion and urban disaster mitigation
Field EH, Dawson TE, Felzer KR et al (2009) Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 2 (UCERF 2). Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:2053–2107. doi:10.1785/0120080049
CrossRef
Fonseca JFBD (2006) The source of the Lisbon earthquake. Science 308:50–51
CrossRef
Frankel A (1995) Mapping seismic hazard in the central and eastern United States. Seismol Res Lett 66:8
CrossRef
Frankel AD, Petersen MD, Mueller CS, et al. (2002) Documentation for the 2002 update of the national seismic hazard maps
Garcia D, Wald DJ, Hearne MG (2012) A global earthquake discrimination scheme to optimize ground-motion prediction equation selection. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102:185–203. doi:10.1785/0120110124
CrossRef
Garcia-Mayordomo J, Insua-Arévalo JM, Martínez-Díaz JJ et al (2012) The Quaternary Active Faults Database of Iberia (QAFI v. 2.0). J Iber Geol 38:285–302
CrossRef
Giardini D (1999) The Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program (GSHAP)—1992/1999. Ann di Geofis 42:957–974. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3121.1992.tb00609.x
Giardini D, Woessner J, Danciu L et al (2013a) Seismic Hazard Harmonization in Europe (SHARE): online data resource. doi:10.12686/SED-00000001-SHARE
Giardini D, Woessner J, Danciu L et al (2013b) SHARE European seismic hazard map for peak ground acceleration, 10 % exceedance probability in 50 years. doi:10.2777/30345
Giardini D, Woessner J, Danciu L (2014) Mapping Europe’s seismic hazard. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 95:261–268. doi:10.1002/2014EO29
CrossRef
Gomez-Capera AA, Rovida A, Gasperini P et al (2014) The determination of earthquake location and magnitude from macroseismic data in Europe. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9672-3
Grünthal G, GSHAP Working Group Region 3 (1999) Seismic hazard assessment for Central, North and Northwest Europe: GSHAP Region 3. Ann di Geofis 42
Grünthal G, Wahlström R (2000) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (horizontal PGA) for Sweden, Finland and Denmark using different logic tree approaches. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 20:45–58
CrossRef
Grünthal G, Wahlström R (2012) The European-Mediterranean Earthquake Catalogue (EMEC) for the last millennium. J Seismol 16:535–570. doi:10.1007/s10950-012-9302-y
CrossRef
Grünthal G, Mayer-Rosa D, Lenhardt W (1998) Abschätzung der Erdbebengefährdung für die D-A-CH-Staaten. Bautechnik 75:753–767
CrossRef
Grünthal G, Wahlström R, Stromeyer D (2013) The SHARE European Earthquake Catalogue (SHEEC) for the time period 1900–2006 and its comparison to the European-Mediterranean Earthquake Catalogue (EMEC). J Seismol 17:1339–1344. doi:10.1007/s10950-013-9379-y
CrossRef
Haller KM, Basili R (2011) Developing seismogenic source models based on geologic fault data. Seismol Res Lett 82:519–525. doi:10.1785/gssrl.82.4.519
CrossRef
Hanks TC, Bakun WH (2002) A bilinear source-scaling model for M-log A observations of continental earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:1841–1846. doi:10.1785/0120010148
CrossRef
Hiemer S, Jackson DD, Wang Q et al (2013) A stochastic forecast of California earthquakes based on fault slip and smoothed seismicity. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103:799–810. doi:10.1785/0120120168
CrossRef
Hiemer S, Woessner J, Basili R et al (2014) A kernel-smoothed stochastic earthquake rate model considering seismicity and fault moment release for Europe. Geophys J Int 198:in review. doi:10.1093/gji/ggu186
Holschneider M, Zöller G, Clements R, Schorlemmer D (2014) Can we test for the maximum possible earthquake magnitude? J Geophys Res Solid Earth. doi:10.1002/2013JB010319
Jimenez MJ, Giardini D, Grünthal G et al (2001) Unified seismic hazard modelling throughout the Mediterranean region. Boll Di Geofis Teor Ed Appl 42:3–18
Johnston AC, Coppersmith KJ, Kanter LR, Cornell CA (1994) The earthquakes of stable continental regions, volume 1: assessment of large earthquake potential. Electric Power Research Institute, USA
Kagan YY (2002) Aftershock zone scaling. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:641–655. doi:10.1785/0120010172
CrossRef
Kagan YY, Jackson DD, Geller RJ (2012) Characteristic earthquake model, 1884–2011, R.I.P. Seismol Res Lett 83:951–953. doi:10.1785/0220120107
CrossRef
Krammerer AM, Ake JP (2011) Practical implementation guidelines for SSHAC level 3 and 4 hazard studies (NUREG-2117)
Kulkarni RB, Youngs RR, Coppersmith KJ (1984) Assessment of confidence intervals for results of seismic hazard analysis. In: Proceedings of the eighth world conference on earthquake engineering, San Francisco, pp 263–270
Lemoine A, Douglas J, Cotton F (2012) Testing the applicability of correlations between topographic slope and vs30 for Europe. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102:2585–2599. doi:10.1785/0120110240
CrossRef
Leonard M (2010) Earthquake fault scaling: self-consistent relating of rupture length, width, average displacement, and moment release. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100:1971–1988. doi:10.1785/0120090189
CrossRef
Lin P-S, Lee C-T (2008) Ground-motion attenuation relationships for subduction-zone earthquakes in northeastern Taiwan. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98:220–240. doi:10.1785/0120060002
CrossRef
Locati M, Rovida A, Albini P, Stucchi M (2014) The AHEAD portal: a gateway to European historical earthquake data. Seismol Res Lett 85:727–734. doi:10.1785/0220130113
CrossRef
Meletti C, Galadini F, Valensise G et al (2008) A seismic source zone model for the seismic hazard assessment of the Italian territory. Tectonophysics 450:85–108. doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2008.01.003
CrossRef
Melletti C, D’Amico V, Martinelli F (2009) SHARE D3.3—homogeneous assessment of the maximum magnitude. Brusselles
Müller RD, Sdrolias M, Gaina C, Roest WR (2008) Age, spreading rates, and spreading asymmetry of the world’s ocean crust. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 9:n/a–n/a. doi:10.1029/2007GC001743
Musson RMW (1999) Probabilistic seismic hazard maps for the north Balkan region. Ann Geophys 42:1109–1124
Musson RMW (2000) Generalised seismic hazard maps for the pannonian basin using probabilistic methods. Pure Appl Geophys 157:147–169. doi:10.1007/PL00001092
CrossRef
Musson RMW (2012) Interpreting intraplate tectonics for seismic hazard: a UK historical perspective. J Seismol 16:261–273. doi:10.1007/s10950-011-9268-1
CrossRef
Musson RMW, Sellami S, Brüstle W (2009) Preparing a seismic hazard model for Switzerland: the view from PEGASOS Expert Group 3 (EG1c). Swiss J Geosci 102:107–120. doi:10.1007/s00015-008-1301-1
CrossRef
Pagani M, Monelli D, Weatherill G et al (2014) OpenQuake Engine: an open hazard (and risk) software for the Global Earthquake Model. Seismol Res Lett 85:692–702. doi:10.1785/0220130087
CrossRef
Papaioannou CA, Papazachos BC (2010) Time-independent and time-dependent seismic hazard in Greece based on seismogenic sources. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90:22–33
CrossRef
Pavlides S, Caputo R, Sboras SP et al (2010) The Greek catalog if active faults and database of seismogenic sources. Bull Geol Soc Greece 43:486–494
Pondrelli S, Morelli A, Ekström G et al (2002) European-Mediterranean regional centroid-moment tensors: 1997–2000. Phys Earth Planet Inter 130:71–101. doi:10.1016/S0031-9201(01)00312-0
CrossRef
Reiter L (1990) Earthquake hazard analysis: issues and insights. Columbia University Press, New York
Scherbaum F, Delavaud E, Riggelsen C (2009) Model selection in seismic hazard analysis: an information-theoretic perspective. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:3234–3247. doi:10.1785/0120080347
CrossRef
Schmid SM, Slejko D (2009) Seismic source characterization of the Alpine foreland in the context of a probabilistic seismic hazard analysis by PEGASOS Expert Group 1 (EG1a). Swiss J Geosci 102:121–148. doi:10.1007/s00015-008-1300-2
CrossRef
Schwartz DP, Coppersmith KJ (1984) Fault behavior and characteristic earthquakes: examples from the Wasatch and San Andreas fault zones. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 89:5681–5698
CrossRef
Siebert L, Simkin T (2002) Volcanoes of the world: an illustrated catalog of Holocene Volcanoes and their eruptions. Smithsonian Institution, Global Volcanism Program Digital Information Series, GVP-3. http://www.volcano.si.edu
Sleijko D, Peruzza L, Rebez A (1998) Seismic hazard maps of Italy. Ann Geophys 41:183–214
Sleijko D, Camassi R, Cecic I et al (1999) Seismic hazard assessment for Adria. Ann Geophys 42:1085–1107
Sokolov VY, Wenzel F, Mohindra R (2009) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Romania and sensitivity analysis: a case of joint consideration of intermediate-depth (Vrancea) and shallow (crustal) seismicity. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29:364–381. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.04.004
CrossRef
Sørensen MB, Stromeyer D, Grünthal G (2010) A macroseismic intensity prediction equation for intermediate depth earthquakes in the Vrancea region, Romania. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30:1268–1278. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.05.009
CrossRef
Spudich P, Chiou BSJ (2008) Directivity in NGA earthquake ground motions: analysis using isochrone theory. Earthq Spectra 24:279. doi:10.1193/1.2928225
CrossRef
Stirling MW, McVerry GH, Berryman KR (2002) A new seismic hazard model for New Zealand. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:1878–1903. doi:10.1785/0120010156
CrossRef
Stirling M, McVerry G, Gerstenberger M et al (2012) National seismic hazard model for New Zealand: 2010 update. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102:1514–1542. doi:10.1785/0120110170
CrossRef
Stiros SC (2010) The 8.5+ magnitude, AD365 earthquake in Crete: coastal uplift, topography changes, archaeological and historical signature. Quat Int 216:54–63. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2009.05.005
CrossRef
Strasser FO, Arango MC, Bommer JJ (2010) Scaling of the source dimensions of interface and intraslab subduction-zone earthquakes with moment magnitude. Seismol Res Lett 81:941–950. doi:10.1785/gssrl.81.6.941
CrossRef
Stucchi M, Meletti C, Montaldo V et al (2011) Seismic hazard assessment (2003–2009) for the Italian building code. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101:1885–1911. doi:10.1785/0120100130
CrossRef
Stucchi M, Rovida A, Gomez Capera AA et al (2012) The SHARE European Earthquake Catalogue (SHEEC) 1000–1899. J Seismol 17:523–544. doi:10.1007/s10950-012-9335-2
CrossRef
Toro GR, Abrahamson NA, Schneider JF (1997) Model of strong ground motions from earthquakes in central and eastern North America: best estimates and uncertainties. Seismol Res Lett 68:41–57. doi:10.1785/gssrl.68.1.41
CrossRef
Van Houtte C, Drouet S, Cotton F (2011) Analysis of the origins of (Kappa) to compute hard rock to rock adjustment factors for GMPEs. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101:2926–2941. doi:10.1785/0120100345
CrossRef
Vanneste K, Camelbeeck T, Verbeeck K (2013) A model of composite seismic sources for the lower Rhine Graben, northwest Europe. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103:984–1007. doi:10.1785/0120120037
CrossRef
Vilanova SP, Nemser ES, Besana-Ostman GM et al (2014) Incorporating descriptive metadata into seismic source zone models for seismic-hazard assessment: a case study of the Azores-West Iberian region. Bull Seismol Soc Am 104:1212–1229. doi:10.1785/0120130210
CrossRef
Weatherill G, Danciu L, Crowley H (2013) Future directions for seismic input in European design codes in the context of the seismic hazard harmonisation in Europe (SHARE) project. Vienna conference on earthquake engineering and structural dynamics pp 28–30
Weichert DH (1980) Estimation of the earthquake recurrence parameters for unequal observation periods. Bull Seismol Soc Am 70:1337–1346
Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:974–1002
Wheeler BRL (2009) Methods of M max estimation east of the rocky mountains. Open file report 2009-1018, USGS
Wheeler RL (2011) Reassessment of stable continental regions. Seismol Res Lett 82:141–143. doi:10.1785/gssrl
CrossRef
Wiemer S, García-Fernández M, Burg J-P (2009a) Development of a seismic source model for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of nuclear power plant sites in Switzerland: the view from PEGASOS Expert Group 4 (EG1d). Swiss J Geosci 102:189–209. doi:10.1007/s00015-009-1311-7
CrossRef
Wiemer S, Giardini D, Fäh D et al (2009b) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Switzerland: best estimates and uncertainties. J Seismol 13:449–478. doi:10.1007/s10950-008-9138-7
CrossRef
Yenier E, Sandikkaya MA, Akkar S (2010) SHARE D4.1—updated strong-ground motion database. Bruxelles
Youngs RR, Coppersmith KJ (1985) Implications of fault slip rates and earthquake recurrence models to probabilistic seismic hazard estimates. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75:939–964
Youngs RR, Chiou SJ, Silva WJ, Humphrey JR (1997) Strong ground motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett 68:58–73. doi:10.1785/gssrl.68.1.58
CrossRef
Zhao JX (2006) Attenuation relations of strong ground motion in Japan using site classification based on predominant period. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:898–913. doi:10.1785/0120050122
CrossRef
Type
article
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
2015_Woessner_etal_BEE_Printed.pdf
Description
Main article, printed version
Size
12.21 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
f554d1b341e74f1f7a0695a1f436e305