Students, earthquakes, media: Does a seismic crisis make a difference?
Author(s)
Language
English
Obiettivo Specifico
3TM. Comunicazione
Status
Published
JCR Journal
JCR Journal
Peer review journal
Yes
Journal
Issue/vol(year)
FAST TRACK 5/59 (2016)
Date Issued
2016
Abstract
How do students use the big data flow of information from the Internet? What is their opinion and trust in
scientists? To what extent catastrophic earthquakes and environmental disasters influence their opinion? In
this study we present the results of a poll conducted on high school students (age 13-20) to assess young Italian
citizens’ trust on geoscientists and their science. The sample of about 700 students refers to areas prone to
natural hazards ranging from low to moderate intensity. To allow a fast and easy compilation, held directly
in school, the poll included only a very few questions. They investigated and accessed the source where the
students retrieve information on catastrophes and natural phenomena, the role of scientists in everyday life
and scientists’ ethical integrity.
Although limited, this is the first poll of this kind and data collected up to now can be used for a rough picture
of the present situation, to compare results with recent disasters and to project future results of on-going
analysis. All information will also help us in a future analysis to understand if and to what extent a recent
earthquake or environmental local crisis can affect the perception.
Students do not completely trust that scientists are genuinely independent from outer urges. They also believe
that media manipulate information with willful misconduct, to hide inconvenient realities or to get economic
advantages. However answers from our Emilia sample of students were unexpected: they did not show
any specific bias after the 2012 seismic sequence. Conversely they show less skepticism towards scientists and
scientific integrity in comparison to students from other regions. This suggests that the perception towards
science and scientists might be driven by cultural and social background and not necessarily affected by recent
seismic crisis. In this perspective this on-going study will be challenged as soon as poll after the Amatrice
2016 seismic sequence will be available.
scientists? To what extent catastrophic earthquakes and environmental disasters influence their opinion? In
this study we present the results of a poll conducted on high school students (age 13-20) to assess young Italian
citizens’ trust on geoscientists and their science. The sample of about 700 students refers to areas prone to
natural hazards ranging from low to moderate intensity. To allow a fast and easy compilation, held directly
in school, the poll included only a very few questions. They investigated and accessed the source where the
students retrieve information on catastrophes and natural phenomena, the role of scientists in everyday life
and scientists’ ethical integrity.
Although limited, this is the first poll of this kind and data collected up to now can be used for a rough picture
of the present situation, to compare results with recent disasters and to project future results of on-going
analysis. All information will also help us in a future analysis to understand if and to what extent a recent
earthquake or environmental local crisis can affect the perception.
Students do not completely trust that scientists are genuinely independent from outer urges. They also believe
that media manipulate information with willful misconduct, to hide inconvenient realities or to get economic
advantages. However answers from our Emilia sample of students were unexpected: they did not show
any specific bias after the 2012 seismic sequence. Conversely they show less skepticism towards scientists and
scientific integrity in comparison to students from other regions. This suggests that the perception towards
science and scientists might be driven by cultural and social background and not necessarily affected by recent
seismic crisis. In this perspective this on-going study will be challenged as soon as poll after the Amatrice
2016 seismic sequence will be available.
Type
article
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
7239-17295-1-PB.pdf
Description
Published manuscript
Size
778.98 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
797e52f9ae7bc7ff741ba2539f413d80
