Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Affiliation
  3. INGV
  4. Article published / in press
  5. Evaluation of AMIP-type atmospheric fields as forcing for Mediterranean Sea and global ocean re-analyses
 
  • Details

Evaluation of AMIP-type atmospheric fields as forcing for Mediterranean Sea and global ocean re-analyses

Author(s)
Cherchi, Annalisa  
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia  
Bishoyi Ratna, Satyaban  
Masina, Simona  
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia  
Storto, Andrea  
Yang, Chunxue  
CNR  
Fratianni, Claudia  
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia  
Simoncelli, Simona  
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia  
Pinardi, Nadia  
Unibo  
Language
English
Obiettivo Specifico
4A. Oceanografia e clima
Status
Published
JCR Journal
JCR Journal
Peer review journal
Yes
Journal
Annals Geophysics  
Issue/vol(year)
5/61 (2018)
Pages (printed)
OC559
Date Issued
2018
DOI
10.4401/ag-7793
URI
https://www.earth-prints.org/handle/2122/12130
Abstract
Oceanic reanalyses are powerful products to reconstruct the historical 3D-state of the ocean and related circulation. At present a challenge is to have oceanic reanalyses covering the whole 20th century. This study describes the exercise of comparing available datasets to force Mediterranean Sea and global oceanic reanalyses from 1901 to present. In particular, we compared available atmospheric reanalyses with a set of experiments performed with an atmospheric general circulation model where sea surface temperature (SST) and sea-ice concen- tration are prescribed. These types of experiments have the advantage of covering long time records, at least for the period for which global SST is available, and they can be performed at relatively high horizontal resolutions, a very important requisite for regional oceanic re- analyses. However, they are limited by the intrinsic model biases in representing the mean atmospheric state and its variability. In this study, we show that, within some limits, the atmospheric model performance in representing the basic variables needed for the bulk-formulae to force oceanic data assimilation systems can be comparable to the differences among available atmospheric reanalyses. In the case of the Mediterranean Sea the high horizontal resolution of the set of SST-prescribed experiments combined with their good performance in rep- resenting the surface winds in the area made them the most appropriate atmospheric forcing. On the other hand, in the case of the global ocean, atmospheric reanalyses have been proven to be still preferable due to the better representation of spatial and temporal variability of surface winds and radiative fluxes. Because of their intrinsic limitations AMIP experiments cannot provide atmospheric fields alterna- tive to atmospheric reanalyses. Nevertheless, here we show how in the specific case of the Mediterranean Sea, they can be of use, if not preferable, to available atmospheric reanalyses.
Type
article
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

cherchietal2018_annals.pdf

Size

8.93 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

c01f74b3d4cfeb5027709826e7aa9f01

rome library|catania library|milano library|napoli library|pisa library|palermo library
Explore By
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
Info
  • Earth-Prints Open Archive Brochure
  • Earth-Prints Archive Policy
  • Why should you use Earth-prints?
Earth-prints working group
⚬Anna Grazia Chiodetti (Project Leader)
⚬Gabriele Ferrara (Technical and Editorial Assistant)
⚬Massimiliano Cascone
⚬Francesca Leone
⚬Salvatore Barba
⚬Emmanuel Baroux
⚬Roberto Basili
⚬Paolo Marco De Martini

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback