Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Affiliation
  3. INGV
  4. Article published / in press
  5. The Potential for Earthquake Early Warning in Italy Using ElarmS
 
  • Details

The Potential for Earthquake Early Warning in Italy Using ElarmS

Author(s)
Olivieri, M.  
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione ONT, Roma, Italia  
Allen, R. M.  
Wurman, G.  
Berkeley Seismological Lab, UCBerkeley, USA  
Language
English
Obiettivo Specifico
1.1. TTC - Monitoraggio sismico del territorio nazionale
Status
Published
JCR Journal
JCR Journal
Peer review journal
Yes
Journal
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America  
Issue/vol(year)
/98 (2008)
Publisher
Seismological Society of America
Pages (printed)
495-503
Date Issued
February 2008
DOI
10.1785/0120070054
URI
https://www.earth-prints.org/handle/2122/3500
Subjects
04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.06. Surveys, measurements, and monitoring  
Subjects

Early Warning

Earthquake Location

Abstract
The new Italian National Seismic Network (INSN) is a dense network of
broadband stations deployed for monitoring Italian seismicity. The network consists
of 250 stations with a typical station spacing of !40 km. Earthquake early warning is
the rapid detection of an event in progress, assessment of the hazard it poses, and
transmission of a warning ahead of any significant ground motion. We explore the
potential for using the INSN real-time network for the purpose of earthquake early
warning. We run the ElarmS early warning methodology off-line using a data set
of more than 200 events with magnitudes between 2.5 and 6.0. A scaling relation
for magnitude determination from the dominant period of the first seconds of signal
following the P onset is developed from the data set. The standard deviation in the
magnitude estimates using this approach is 0.4 magnitude units, and all event magnitude
estimates are within !0:75 magnitude units of the true magnitude. Given the
existing distribution of seismic stations it takes an average of 10 sec after event initiation
before the P wave has been detected at four stations. If we require a detection
at four stations before issuing the first alert, then the blind zone, within which no
warning would be available, has a radius of !37 km. The ElarmS methodology
can provide a warning earlier than this but with a greater uncertainty. An assessment
of past damaging earthquakes across Italy shows that applying ElarmS with the existing
seismic network could provide warning to population centers in repeats of past
events. For example, in a repeat of the 1980 Irpinia earthquake Naples could receive
an !15- sec warning. The variations in the size of the blind zone and warning times for
different regions can be used as a guide to selecting strategic locations for future station
deployments.
References
Allen, R. M. (2004). Rapid magnitude determination for earthquake early
warning, in The Many Facets of Seismic Risk, M. Pecce, G. Manfredi
and A. Zollo (Editors), Universita degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”,
Napoli, 15–24.
Allen, R. M., and H. Kanamori (2003). The potential for early warning in
southern California, Science 300, 786–789.
Amato, A., R. Azzara, C. Chiarabba, G. B. Cimini, M. Cocco, M. Di Bona,
L. Margheriti, S. Mazza, F. Mele, G. Selvaggi, A. Basili, E. Boschi, F.
Courboulex, A. Deschamps, S. Gaffet, G. Bittarelli, L. Chiaraluce, D.
Piccinini, and M. Ripepe (1998). The 1997 Umbria-Marche, Italy,
earthquake sequence: a first look at the main shocks and aftershocks,
Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, no. 15, 2861–2864.
Boese, M., M. Erdik, and F. Wenzel (2004). Real-time prediction of ground
motion from P-wave records (Abstract S21A-0251), EOS Trans. AGU
85, (Fall Meet. Suppl.), S21A-0251.
Boschi, E., E. Guidoboni, G. Ferrari, G. Valensise, and P. Gasperini (1997).
Catalogo dei Forti Terremoti in Italia dal 461 a.C. al 1990, ING e SGA
Bologna, 644 pp.
Erdik, M. O., Y. Fahjan, O. Ozel, H. Alcik, M. Aydin, and M. Gul (2003).
Istanbul earthquake early warning and rapid response system (Abstract
S42B-0153), EOS Trans. AGU 84, (Fall Meet. Suppl.), S42B-0153.
Espinosa-Aranda, J. A., A. Jimenez, G. Ibarrola, F. Alcantar, A. Aguilar, M.
Inostroza, and S. Maldonado (1995). Mexico City seismic alert system,
Seism. Res. Lett. 66, 42–53.
Grasso, V. F., and R. M. Allen (in review). Uncertainty in real-time earth-
quake hazard predictions, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am..
Horiuchi, S., H. Negishi, K. Abe, A. Kamimura, and Y. Fujinawa (2005). An
automatic processing system for broadcasting earthquake alarms, Bull.
Seismol. Soc. Am. 95, 708–718.
International Seismological Centre (ISC) (2001), On-line Bulletin, http://www
.isc.ac.uk (last accessed Month Year).
Kamigaichi, O. (2004). JMA earthquake early warning, J. Jpn. Assoc.
Earthq. Eng. 4, 1–4.
Lockman, A., and R. M. Allen (2007). Magnitude-period scaling relations
for Japan and the Pacific Northwest: Implications for earthquake early
warning, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 97, no. 1, 140–150, doi 10.1785/
0120040091.
Mazza, S., M. Olivieri, A. M. Mandiello, and P. Casale (in press) The Med-
Net Network, in Proceeding of the Disaster Forecast and Prevention
—Earthquake Monitoring and Seismic Hazard Mitigation in Balkan
Countries Workshop.
Nakamura, Y. (1988). On the urgent earthquake detection and alarm system
(UrEDAS), in Proc. 9th World Conf. Earthquake Eng. VII, 673–678.
Nakamura, Y., and B. E. Tucker (1988). Earthquake warning system for Ja-
pan Railways’ Bullet Trains: implications for disaster prevention in
California, Earthq. Volcanoes 20, 140–155.
Olivieri, M., and J. Schweitzer (in press). An empirical procedure for rapid
magnitude estimate in Italy, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am..
Olson, E. L., and R. M. Allen (2005). The deterministic nature of earthquake
rupture, Nature 438, 212–215, doi 10.1038/nature04214.
Olson, E. L., and R. M. Allen (2006). Is earthquake rupture deterministic?
(Reply), Nature 442, E6.
Saita, J., and Y. Nakamura (2003). UrEDAS: The early warning system for
mitigation of disaster caused by earthquakes and Tsunamis, in Early
Waning Systems for Natural Disaster Reduction, J. Zschau and A. N.
Küppers (Editors), Springer, Berlin.
Wessel, P., and W. H. F. Smith (1995). New version of the generic mapping
tools released, EOS 76, 329.
Wu, Y. M., and H. Kanamori (2005). Rapid assessment of damage potential
of earthquakes in Taiwan from the beginning of P waves, Bull. Seismol.
Soc. Am. 95, 1181–1185.
Wu, Y. M., and T. L. Teng (2002). A virtual subnetwork approach to earth-
quake early warning, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92, 2008–2018.
Wu, Y. M., and L. Zhao (2006). Magnitude estimation using the first three
seconds P-wave amplitude in earthquake early warning, Geophys. Res.
Lett. 33, L16312.
Wu, Y. M., T. C. Shin, and Y. B. Tsai (1998). Quick and reliable determina-
tion of magnitude for seismic early warning, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
88, 1254–1259.
Wurman, G., R. M. Allen, and P. Lombard (submitted). Toward earthquake
early warning in northern california, J. Geophys. Res..
Zollo, A., M. Lancieri, and S. Nielsen (2006). Earthquake magnitude esti-
mation from peak amplitudes of very early seismic signals on strong
motion records, Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L23312, doi 10.1029/
2006GL0297795.
Type
article
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

2007054_to_earthprint.pdf

Size

4.87 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

7a340670bc43e9a8e5238b9d28e5e973

rome library|catania library|milano library|napoli library|pisa library|palermo library
Explore By
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
Info
  • Earth-Prints Open Archive Brochure
  • Earth-Prints Archive Policy
  • Why should you use Earth-prints?
Earth-prints working group
⚬Anna Grazia Chiodetti (Project Leader)
⚬Gabriele Ferrara (Technical and Editorial Assistant)
⚬Massimiliano Cascone
⚬Francesca Leone
⚬Salvatore Barba
⚬Emmanuel Baroux
⚬Roberto Basili
⚬Paolo Marco De Martini

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback