Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Affiliation
  3. INGV
  4. Book chapters
  5. Uncertainty Assessment of Pyroclastic Density Currents Uncertainty Assessment of Pyroclastic Density Currents Cone Model
 
  • Details

Uncertainty Assessment of Pyroclastic Density Currents Uncertainty Assessment of Pyroclastic Density Currents Cone Model

Author(s)
Tierz, Pablo  
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia  
Sandri, Laura  
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia  
Costa, Antonio  
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia  
Sulpizio, Roberto  
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra e Geoambientali, Università di Bari, Bari, Italy and Istituto per la Dinamica dei Processi Ambientali, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, IDPA CNR, Milano, Italy  
Zaccarelli, Lucia  
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia  
Di Vito, Mauro Antonio  
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione OV, Napoli, Italia  
Marzocchi, Warner  
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione ONT, Roma, Italia  
Editor(s)
Riley, Karin  
Webley, Peter  
Thompson, Matthew  
Language
English
Obiettivo Specifico
1VV. Altro
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Status
Published
Pages Number
126-145
Refereed
Yes
Journal
Natural Hazard Uncertainty Assessment: Modeling and Decision Support, Geophysical Monograph 223  
Date Issued
2017
URI
https://www.earth-prints.org/handle/2122/11574
Subjects

Pyroclastic density c...

Abstract
Pyroclastic density currents (PDCs) are extremely dangerous phenomena so their modeling is essential for haz­ ard and risk purposes. However, PDCs are governed by very complex processes, making their deterministic prediction impossible. Probabilistic approaches are in a pioneering phase and feature large (and still unknown) uncertainties, from the natural variability of PDCs (aleatory uncertainty) to the main sources of epistemic uncertainty (input, parametric, theoretical and structural). In this chapter, we quantify these uncertainties by using the Energy Cone Model (ECM) in a Monte Carlo scheme applied to Mount Vesuvius. According to our results, theoretical uncertainty has the largest impact, 5 to 100 times bigger than input uncertainty, which seems to play a minor role. We find that conditional probabilities of PDC arrival (given an eruption of a specific size) show spatial distributions related to the surrounding topography. In particular, for medium and large eruptions, the conditional probability of PDCs traveling beyond Mount Somma is 1%–15% and 50%–60%, while they reach the Napoli airport in about 0%–1% and 0%–15% of the simulations, respectively. Small‐eruption PDCs remain restricted to the south flank and summit area. These results may guide future research devoted to reduce epistemic uncertainties and improve volcanic hazard analyses associated with PDCs.
Type
book chapter
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

di_tierz_agu monograph 2017 ch9.pdf

Size

1.33 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

e587f6d931b1e10fc36a5d55e17ba567

rome library|catania library|milano library|napoli library|pisa library|palermo library
Explore By
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
Info
  • Earth-Prints Open Archive Brochure
  • Earth-Prints Archive Policy
  • Why should you use Earth-prints?
Earth-prints working group
⚬Anna Grazia Chiodetti (Project Leader)
⚬Gabriele Ferrara (Technical and Editorial Assistant)
⚬Massimiliano Cascone
⚬Francesca Leone
⚬Salvatore Barba
⚬Emmanuel Baroux
⚬Roberto Basili
⚬Paolo Marco De Martini

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback