Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Editorial Initiatives
  3. eJournals
  4. Annals of Geophysics
  5. Source signature processing in deep water, Gulf of Mexico: comparison between deterministic deconvolution and phase conjugation
 
  • Details

Source signature processing in deep water, Gulf of Mexico: comparison between deterministic deconvolution and phase conjugation

Author(s)
Partouche, C. R.  
Center for Marine Resources and Environmental Technology, University of Mississippi, University, US.A.  
Date Issued
December 2000
Issue/vol(year)
6/43 (2000)
Language
English
Subjects
04. Solid Earth::04.02. Exploration geophysics::04.02.99. General or miscellaneous  
04. Solid Earth::04.02. Exploration geophysics::04.02.06. Seismic methods  
URI
https://www.earth-prints.org/handle/2122/1288
Subjects

oversampling

source signature

deconvolution

Abstract
The Center for Marine Resources and Environmental Technology has been developing a new method to improve the resolution of high-resolution seismic profiling. To achieve this the source signature is recorded and the reflected data are sampled at a very high rate. In addition a certain amount of post processing is performed. During September 1999 a series of seismic profiles were acquired in the Gulf of Mexico using a 15 in³ watergun towed at the surface and a short single-channel hydrophone array towed about 250 m below the surface. The profiles were digitized at a rate of 80 000 samples per second; the length of each record was 4 s. Two different processes were applied to the data: deterministic deconvolution and phase conjugation. Both have the effect of compressing each reflected wavelet into a short pulse that is symmetrical about a central lobe. The ratio of compression obtained by applying deterministic deconvolution on the source signature pulse was about 300; it was about 160 when applying phase conjugation. This produced a resolution of about 6 cm by the deconvolution process and about 10 cm by using phase conjugation. The deconvolution process however is more subject to noise so the better result in this experiment was found to be provided by phase conjugation.
Type
article
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

12 n.pdf

Size

4.27 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

5bfdbd82b515b197512a4fc677d42d10

rome library|catania library|milano library|napoli library|pisa library|palermo library
Explore By
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
Info
  • Earth-Prints Open Archive Brochure
  • Earth-Prints Archive Policy
  • Why should you use Earth-prints?
Earth-prints working group
⚬Anna Grazia Chiodetti (Project Leader)
⚬Gabriele Ferrara (Technical and Editorial Assistant)
⚬Massimiliano Cascone
⚬Francesca Leone
⚬Salvatore Barba
⚬Emmanuel Baroux
⚬Roberto Basili
⚬Paolo Marco De Martini

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback