A study of spectral methods of estimating the depth to the bottom of magnetic sources from near-surface magnetic anomaly data

Based on a critical evaluation of several different spectral magnetic depth determination techniques on areally large synthetic layered and random magnetization models, we recommend the following considerations in the usage of the methods as necessary prerequisites to successful bottom depth determinations: (1) using windows with sufficient width to ascertain that the response of the deepest magnetic layer is captured and by verifying the spectra and computing the depth estimates with the largest possible windows (>300-500 km); (2) avoiding filtering to remove arbitrary regional fields, accomplished by compiling magnetic anomalies derived from modern spherical harmonic degree 13 Earth's main field models e.g. recent International Geomagnetic Reference Field models (IGRF) or Comprehensive models (CM); (3) ascertaining the near-circularity of the autocorrelation function to avoid analysing biased spectra containing strong anomaly trends; and (4) avoid determining the slopes from the exponential, low wavenumber part of the spectra in the cases of layered magnetization. We also describe the details of the new spectral peak forward modelling method and discuss the conditions under which the method can lead to useful results. We found that, despite all these precautions, in some cases, the results can still be erroneous and, therefore, we recommend a critical evaluation of the results by modelling heat flow and taking into account seismic information on the crustal and lithospheric thicknesses and seismic velocities wherever possible. In the southcentral US, east of the Rockies, where the surface heat flow ranges between 40 and 65 mW m?2, we obtained the magnetic bottom depth of 40 ± 10 km using the approach of the forward modelling of the spectral peak. This range is similar to the seismically derived crustal thickness of 45-50 km, suggesting, therefore, that the entire crust may be magnetic in this region. Because of the uncertainties in the various heat flow contributing parameters, such as the variations in thermal conductivity, radiogenic heat and hydraulic regime, we could not constrain the lithospheric thickness beyond an estimate ranging approximately from 100 to 200 km.

Bankey, V. et al., 2002, Digital data grids for the magnetic anomaly map
of North America, US Geological Survey Open-File Report 02-414
(http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2002/ofr-02-414/).
Bhattacharyya,B.K.&Leu, L.K., 1975. Analysis of magnetic anomalies over
Yellowstone National Park. Mapping the Curie-point isotherm surface for
geothermal reconnaissance, J. geophys. Res., 80, 461–465.
Bhattacharyya, B.K. & Leu, L.K., 1977. Spectral analysis of gravity and
magnetic anomalies due to rectangular prismatic bodies, Geophysics, 41,
41–50.
Blakely, R., 1988. Curie temperature isotherm analysis and tectonic implications
of aeromagnetic data from Nevada, J. geophys. Res., 93, 11 817–
11 832.
Blakely, R.J., 1995. Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications,
Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
Braile, L.W., Hinze, W.J., von Frese, R.R.B. & Keller, G.R., 1989. Seismic
properties of the crust and uppermost mantle of the conterminous United
States and adjacent Canada, Geol. Soc. Am. Memoir, 172, 655–680.
Chiozzi, P., Matsushima, J., Okubo, Y., Pasquale, V. & Verdoya, M., 2005.
Curie-point depth from spectral analysis of magnetic data in centralsouthern
Europe, Phys. Earth planet. Int., 152, 267–276.
Connard, G., Couch, R. & Gemperle, M., 1983. Analysis of aeromagnetic
measurements from the Cascade Range and in central Oregon, Geophysics,
48, 376–390.
Fedi, M., Quarta, T. & De Santis, A., 1997. Improvements to the Spector
and Grant method of source depth estimation using the power law decay
of magnetic field power spectra, Geophysics, 62, 1143–1150.
Finn, C.A.&Ravat, D., 2004, Magnetic Depth Estimates and Their Potential for Constraining Crustal Composition and Heat Flow in Antarctica, EOS,
Trans. Am. geophys. Un., 85(47), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract T11A-1236.
Fowler, C.M.R., 2005. The Solid Earth: An Introduction to Global Geophysics,
2nd edn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Langel, R.A. & Hinze, W.J., 1998. The magnetic field of the Earth’s lithosphere:
the satellite perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Lachenbruch, A.H. & Sass, J.H., 1978. Models of an extending lithosphere
and heat flow in the Basin and Range province, in Cenozoic tectonics and
regional geophysics of the western Cordillera, pp. 209–250, eds, Smith,
R.B. & Eaton, G.P., The Geological Society of America Memoir 152,
Geological Society of America, Boulder.
Maus, S. & Dimri, V., 1995. Potential field power spectrum inversion for
scaling geology, J. geophys. Res., 100, 12 605–12 616.
Okubo, Y., Graf, R.J., Hansen, R.O., Ogawa, K.&Tsu, H., 1985. Curie point
depths of the island of Kyushu and surrounding areas, Japan, Geophysics,
53, 481–494.
Pilkington, M. & Todoeschuck, J.P., 1993. Fractal magnetization of continental
crust, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 627–630.
Pilkington, M., Gregotski, M.E. & Todoeschuck, J.P., 1994. Using fractal
crustal magnetization models in magnetic interpretation, Geophys.
Prospect, 42, 677–692.
Ravat, D., 2004. Constructing full spectrum potential-field anomalies for
enhanced geodynamical analysis through integration of surveys from different
platforms (INVITED), EOS, Trans. Am. geophys. Un., 85(47), Fall
Meet. Suppl., Abstract G44A-03.
Ravat, D., Hildenbrand, T.G. & Roest, W., 2003. New way of processing
near-surface magnetic data: The utility of the Comprehensive Magnetic
Field Model, The Leading Edge, 22, 784–785.
Ross, H.E., Blakely, R.J. & Zoback, M.D., 2004. Testing the Utilization of
Aeromagnetic Data for the Determination of Curie-IsothermDepth, EOS,
Trans. Am. geophys. Un., 85(47), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract T31A-1287.
Sabaka, T.J., Olsen, N. & Langel, R.A., 2002. A comprehensive model of
the quiet-time, near-Earth magnetic field: phase 3, Geophys. J. Int., 151,
32–68.
Shuey, R.T., Schellinger, D.K., Tripp, A.C.& Alley, L.B., 1977. Curie determination
from aeromagnetic spectra, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 50, 75–101.
Spector, A. & Grant, F.S., 1970. Statistical models for interpreting aeromagnetic
data, Geophysics, 35, 293–302.
Tanaka, A., Okubo,Y.&Matsubayashi,O., 1999. Curie point depth based on
spectrum analysis of magnetic anomaly data in East and Southeast Asia,
Tectonophysics, 306, 461–470.
Van Schmus, W.R., Bickford, M.E. & Turek, A., 1996. Proterozoic geology
of the east-central Midcontinent basement, Geol. Soc. Am. Special Paper,
308, 7–32.
Wasilewski, P.J., Thomas, H.H. & Mayhew, M.A., 1979. The Moho as a
magnetic boundary, Geophys. Res. Lett., 6, 541–544.
West, M., Ni, J., Baldridge, W.S., Wilson, D., Aster, R., Gao, W. & Grand,
S., 2004. Crust and upper mantle shear wave structure of the southwest
United States: Implications for rifting and support for high elevation, J.
geophys. Res., 109, B03309