Physics-Based Simulation of Sequences with Foreshocks, Aftershocks and Multiple Main Shocks in Italy

We applied a new version of physics-based earthquake simulator upon a seismogenic model of the Italian seismicity derived from the latest version of the Database of Individual Seismogenic Sources (DISS). We elaborated appropriately for their use within the simulator all fault systems identified in the study area. We obtained synthetic catalogs spanning hundreds of thousands of years. The resulting synthetic seismic catalogs exhibit typical magnitude, space and time features that are comparable to those obtained by real observations. A typical aspect of the observed seismicity is the occurrence of earthquake sequences characterized by multiple main shocks of similar magnitude. Special attention was devoted to verifying whether the simulated catalogs include this notable aspect, by the use of an especially developed computer code. We found that the phenomenon of Coulomb stress transfer from causative to receiving source patches during an earthquake rupture has a critical role in the behavior of seismicity patterns in the simulated catalogs. We applied the simulator to the seismicity of the northern and central Apennines and compared the resulting synthetic catalog with the observed seismicity for the period 1650–2020. The result of this comparison supports the hypothesis that the occurrence of sequences containing multiple mainshocks is not just a casual circumstance.

Rhoades, D.A.; Evison, F.F. Long-range earthquake forecasting with every earthquake a precursor according to scale. Pure Appl.
Geophys. 2004, 161, 47–72. [CrossRef]
2. Rhoades, D.A.; Evison, F.F. Test of the EEPAS forecasting model on the Japan earthquake catalog. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2005,
162, 1271–1290. [CrossRef]
3. Rhoades, D.; Evison, F. The EEPAS forecasting model and the probability of moderate-to-large earthquakes in central Japan.
Tectonophysics 2006, 417, 119–130. [CrossRef]
4. Evison, F.; Rhoades, D. The precursory earthquake swarm in New Zealand: Hypothesis tests. N. Z. J. Geol. Geophys. 1997,
40, 537–547. [CrossRef]
5. Gardner, J.; Knopoff, L. Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bull.
Seismol. Soc. Am. 1974, 64, 1363–1367. [CrossRef]
6. Gentili, S.; Di Giovambattista, R. Forecasting strong aftershocks in earthquake clusters from northeastern Italy and western
Slovenia. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2020, 303, 106483. [CrossRef]
7. Console, R.; Murru, M.; Vannoli, P.; Carluccio, R.; Taroni, M.; Falcone, G. Physics-based simulation of sequences with multiple
main shocks in Central Italy. Geophys. J. Int. 2020, 223, 526–542. [CrossRef]
8. Console, R.; Vannoli, P.; Carluccio, R. The seismicity of the Central Apennines (Italy) studied by means of a physics-based
earthquake simulator. Geophys. J. Int. 2018, 212, 916–929. [CrossRef]
9. DISS Working Group. Database of Individual Seismogenic Sources (DISS), Version 3.3.0: A Compilation of Potential Sources for
Earthquakes Larger Than M 5.5 in Italy and Surrounding Areas. Available online: https://doi.org/10.13127/diss3.3.0 (accessed
on 16 December 2021).
10. Rovida, A.; Locati, M.; Camassi, R.; Lolli, B.; Gasperini, P.; Antonucci, A. The Italian Earthquake Catalogue CPTI15—Version 3.0;
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV): Rome, Italy, 2021.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2062 14 of 14
11. Pondrelli, S.; Visini, F.; Rovida, A.; D’Amico, V.; Pace, B.; Meletti, C. Style of faulting of expected earthquakes in Italy as an input
for seismic hazard modeling. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2020, 20, 3577–3592. [CrossRef]
12. Mariucci, M.T.; Montone, P. Database of Italian present-day stress indicators, IPSI 1.4. Sci. Data 2020, 7, 1–11. [CrossRef]
13. Devoti, R.; d’Agostino, N.; Serpelloni, E.; Pietrantonio, G.; Riguzzi, F.; Avallone, A.; Cavaliere, A.; Cheloni, D.; Cecere, G.;
d’Ambrosio, C.; et al. A combined velocity field of the Mediterranean region. Ann. Geophys. 2017, 60, S0215, doi:10.4401/ag-7059.
[CrossRef]
14. Vannoli, P.; Burrato, P.; Fracassi, U.; Valensise, G. A fresh look at the seismotectonics of the Abruzzi (Central Apennines) following
the 6 April 2009 L’Aquila earthquake (Mw 6.3). Ital. J. Geosci. 2012, 131, 309–329. [CrossRef]
15. Michele, M.; Chiaraluce, L.; Di Stefano, R.;Waldhauser, F. Fine-scale structure of the 2016–2017 Central Italy seismic sequence
from data recorded at the Italian National Network. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 2020, 125, e2019JB018440. [CrossRef]
16. Basili, R.; Valensise, G.; Vannoli, P.; Burrato, P.; Fracassi, U.; Mariano, S.; Tiberti, M.M.; Boschi, E. The Database of Individual
Seismogenic Sources (DISS), version 3: summarizing 20 years of research on Italy’s earthquake geology. Tectonophysics 2008,
453, 20–43. [CrossRef]
17. Bonini, L.; Basili, R.; Burrato, P.; Cannelli, V.; Fracassi, U.; Maesano, F.E.; Melini, D.; Tarabusi, G.; Tiberti, M.M.; Vannoli, P.; et al.
Testing different tectonic models for the source of the Mw 6.5, 30 October 2016, Norcia earthquake (central Italy): A youthful
normal fault, or negative inversion of an old thrust? Tectonics 2019, 38, 990–1017. [CrossRef]
18. Di Bucci, D.; Buttinelli, M.; D’Ambrogi, C.; Scrocca, D.; Anzidei, M.; Basili, R.; Bigi, S.; Bignami, C.; Bonini, L.; Bonomo, R.; et al.
RETRACE-3D project: A multidisciplinary collaboration to build a crustal model for the 2016–2018 central Italy seismic sequence.
Boll. Geofis. Teor. Appl. 2021, 62, 1–18. [CrossRef]
19. Vannoli, P.; Vannucci, G.; Bernardi, F.; Palombo, B.; Ferrari, G. The source of the 30 October 1930 Mw 5.8 Senigallia (Central
Italy) earthquake: A convergent solution from instrumental, macroseismic, and geological data. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 2015,
105, 1548–1561. [CrossRef]
20. Vannoli, P.; Burrato, P.; Valensise, G. The seismotectonics of the Po Plain (northern Italy): Tectonic diversity in a blind faulting
domain. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2015, 172, 1105–1142. [CrossRef]
21. Zampieri, D.; Vannoli, P.; Burrato, P. Geodynamic and seismotectonic model of a long-lived transverse structure: The Schio-
Vicenza Fault System (NE Italy). Solid Earth Discuss. 2021, 12, 1967–1986. [CrossRef]
22. Console, R.; Carluccio, R.; Murru, M.; Papadimitriou, E.; Karakostas, V. Physics-Based Simulation of Spatiotemporal Patterns of
Earthquakes in the Corinth Gulf, Greece, Fault System. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 2022, 112-1, 98–117. [CrossRef]
23. Console, R.; Nardi, A.; Carluccio, R.; Murru, M.; Falcone, G.; Parsons, T. A physics-based earthquake simulator; its application to
seismic hazard assessment in Calabria (Southern Italy) region. Acta Geophys. 2017, 65, 243–257. [CrossRef]
24. Hanks, T.C.; Kanamori, H. A moment magnitude scale. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 1979, 84, 2348–2350. [CrossRef]
25. Montuori, C.; Murru, M.; Falcone, G. Spatial variation of the b-value observed for the periods preceding and following the 24
August 2016, Amatrice earthquake (ML 6.0)(central Italy). Annals Geophys. 2016, 59. [CrossRef]
26. Papadopoulos, GA; Minadakis, G.; Orfanogiannaki, K. Short-term foreshocks; earthquake prediction. In AGU Geophysical
Monograph Series Book, 1st ed.; American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC, USA, 2018; pp. 127–147.
27. Gulia, L.;Wiemer, S. Real-time discrimination of earthquake foreshocks; aftershocks. Nature 2019, 574, 193–199. [CrossRef]