Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Affiliation
  3. INGV
  4. Article published / in press
  5. Indicators for site characterization at seismic station: recommendation from a dedicated survey
 
  • Details

Indicators for site characterization at seismic station: recommendation from a dedicated survey

Author(s)
Cultrera, Giovanna  
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia  
Cornou, Cécile  
Univ. Grenoble Alpes,Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS,IRD  
Di Giulio, Giuseppe  
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia  
Bard, Pierre-Yves  
Univ. Grenoble Alpes,Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS,IRD  
Language
English
Obiettivo Specifico
5T. Sismologia, geofisica e geologia per l'ingegneria sismica
Status
Published
JCR Journal
JCR Journal
Peer review journal
Yes
Journal
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering  
Issue/vol(year)
/19 (2021)
ISSN
1570-761X
Publisher
Springer
Pages (printed)
4171–4195
Date Issued
June 2021
DOI
10.1007/s10518-021-01136-7
URI
https://www.earth-prints.org/handle/2122/14781
Subjects

Site effects

Station metadata

Seismic network

Strong ground motion

Site proxies

Seismic network datab...

Abstract
In recent years, the permanent seismic networks worldwide have largely increased, raising the amount of earthquake signals and the applications using seismic records. Although characterization of the soil properties at recording stations has a large impact on hazard estimates, it has not been implemented so far in a standardized way for reaching high-level metadata. To address this issue, we built an online questionnaire for the identification of the indicators useful for a reliable site characterization at a seismic station. We analysed the answers of a large number of experts in different fields, which allowed us to rank 24 different indicators and to identify the most relevant ones: fundamental frequency (f0), shear-wave velocity profile (VS), time-averaged Vs over 30 m (VS30), depth of seismological and engineering bedrock (Hseis_bed and Heng_bed), surface geology and soil class. Moreover, the questionnaire proposed two additional indices in terms of cost and difficulty to obtain a reliable value of each indicator, showing that the selection of the most relevant indicators results from a complex balance between physical relevancy, average cost and reliability. For each indicator we propose a summary report, provided as editable pdf, containing the background information of data acquisition and processing details, with the aim to homogenize site metadata information at European level and to define the quality of the site characterization (see companion paper Di Giulio et al. 2021). The selected indicators and the summary reports have been shared within European and worldwide scientific community and discussed in a dedicated international workshop. They represent a first attempt to reach a homogeneous set of high-level metadata for site characterization.
Type
article
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

10518_2021_1136_MOESM2_ESM.pdf

Description
Open Resource 2
Size

1.75 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

a0ce58d8d8fd2f16c3b854b262cbaeee

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

10518_2021_1136_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Description
Open Resource 1
Size

1.94 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

66a2aeb07ee71a997c6864f5278c05e1

rome library|catania library|milano library|napoli library|pisa library|palermo library
Explore By
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
Info
  • Earth-Prints Open Archive Brochure
  • Earth-Prints Archive Policy
  • Why should you use Earth-prints?
Earth-prints working group
⚬Anna Grazia Chiodetti (Project Leader)
⚬Gabriele Ferrara (Technical and Editorial Assistant)
⚬Massimiliano Cascone
⚬Francesca Leone
⚬Salvatore Barba
⚬Emmanuel Baroux
⚬Roberto Basili
⚬Paolo Marco De Martini

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback