Three-years of SO2 flux measurements of Mt. Etna using an automated UV scanner array: Comparison with conventional traverses and uncertainties in flux retrieval
Author(s)
Language
English
Obiettivo Specifico
1.2. TTC - Sorveglianza geochimica delle aree vulcaniche attive
Status
Published
JCR Journal
JCR Journal
Peer review journal
Yes
Issue/vol(year)
/183(2009)
Publisher
Elsevier
Pages (printed)
76-83
Date Issued
2009
Last version
http://hdl.handle.net/2122/4836
Subjects
Abstract
Routine measurements of SO2 flux using the traverse method on Mt. Etna (Italy) were augmented in late 2004 when an array of automatic scanning ultraviolet spectrometers was installed. Each instrument allows one SO2 scan to be recorded every ~6 min. Here we report the methods that we developed to automatically and robustly transform SO2 profiles into SO2 flux data. Radian geometry and Fast Fourier Transform algorithm were used for reducing plume cross-sections and for discriminating between volcanic plumes from those produced by water vapour clouds. Uncertainty in flux measurements depends on the accuracy of plume height estimation, on assumptions concerning plume-geometry, and on the quality of the retrieved SO2 amounts. We compare 3 years of flux measurements made using both the automated network and
“conventional” traverse methods beneath the plume.We found a good agreement between the datasets, both in terms of magnitude and in temporal variations. These results validate the Etna SO2 flux monitoring system.
Emission rates are available to the 24-hour manned operations room via intranet, providing real-time information on degassing rates and plume location.
“conventional” traverse methods beneath the plume.We found a good agreement between the datasets, both in terms of magnitude and in temporal variations. These results validate the Etna SO2 flux monitoring system.
Emission rates are available to the 24-hour manned operations room via intranet, providing real-time information on degassing rates and plume location.
Sponsors
(1)Sviluppo di sistemi di monitoraggio Dipartimento di Protezione Civile della Regione Sicilia, (2)INGV (Istituto
Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, sezione di Catania — Italy), (3)NOVAC (Network for Observation of Volcanic and Atmospheric Change)EU-funded Sixth Framework Programme project 18354. ()4 UK NERC National Centre for Earth Observation via
the “Dynamic Earth and geo-hazards”.
Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, sezione di Catania — Italy), (3)NOVAC (Network for Observation of Volcanic and Atmospheric Change)EU-funded Sixth Framework Programme project 18354. ()4 UK NERC National Centre for Earth Observation via
the “Dynamic Earth and geo-hazards”.
Type
article
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
Salerno et al., 2009.pdf
Description
article
Size
601.6 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
1f1426f15a7c62b4e93e1f165dcf21c3
