Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Affiliation
  3. External Contributions
  4. Article published / in press
  5. Half‐graben rupture geometry of the 30 October 2016 M W 6.6 Mt. Vettore‐Mt. Bove earthquake, central Italy
 
  • Details

Half‐graben rupture geometry of the 30 October 2016 M W 6.6 Mt. Vettore‐Mt. Bove earthquake, central Italy

Author(s)
Cheloni, Daniele  
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione ONT, Roma, Italia  
Falcucci, Emanuela  
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia  
Gori, Stefano  
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia  
Language
English
Obiettivo Specifico
2T. Deformazione crostale attiva
3T. Sorgente sismica
Status
Published
JCR Journal
JCR Journal
Peer review journal
Yes
Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth  
Issue/vol(year)
4/124 (2019)
Pages (printed)
4091-4118
Date Issued
March 19, 2019
DOI
10.1029/2018JB015851
URI
https://www.earth-prints.org/handle/2122/12436
Subjects
04.03. Geodesy  
04.04. Geology  
04.06. Seismology  
Subjects

Normal faulting earth...

Abstract
Existing models for the rupture geometry and slip distribution associated with the 30 October Mw 6.6 Mt. Vettore‐Mt. Bove earthquake in central Italy show significant dissimilarities. Indeed, due to the quite complicated observed deformation pattern, the activation of a complex multi‐fault structure during a single seismic event was invoked. In this study, we explore different rupture scenarios and we develop a robust model of the rupture process of the 30 October earthquake, designed from new field observations, aftershocks distribution and static coseismic offsets including new near‐field survey‐mode GPS measurements, regional GPS observations, InSAR interferograms and static displacements derived from strong‐motion stations. Our preferred best‐fit model involves the simultaneously rupture of the master Mt. Vettore‐Mt. Bove normal fault and of at least two secondary antithetic faults (as they significantly contributed to the total deformation field), which overall describe a “simple conceptual” half‐graben normal fault system, and whose arrangement fits the geological, seismological and the coseismic evidence of surface faulting. Notably, our model fits the geometry of seismogenic structures defined prior to the 2016‐2017 seismic sequence by field Quaternary geological observations. In addition, no significant coseismic slip on faults alternative to the master and antithetic faults is necessary to explain the observed surface displacements during the 30 October Mt. Vettore‐Mt. Bove earthquake.
Type
article
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

Cheloni_et_al-2019-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Solid_Earth.pdf

Size

3.87 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

7300e2d7afa03d85c5dfd9120d96aa2f

rome library|catania library|milano library|napoli library|pisa library|palermo library
Explore By
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
Info
  • Earth-Prints Open Archive Brochure
  • Earth-Prints Archive Policy
  • Why should you use Earth-prints?
Earth-prints working group
⚬Anna Grazia Chiodetti (Project Leader)
⚬Gabriele Ferrara (Technical and Editorial Assistant)
⚬Massimiliano Cascone
⚬Francesca Leone
⚬Salvatore Barba
⚬Emmanuel Baroux
⚬Roberto Basili
⚬Paolo Marco De Martini

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback