Automatic scaling of critical frequency foF2 and MUF(3000)F2: A comparison between Autoscala and ARTIST 4.5 on Rome data

The performances of Autoscala and ARTIST 4.5 were comparatively evaluated using a large database of 6098 ionograms recorded from September 2005 to June 2006 by the digisonde DPS4 at the Rome ionospheric station. Results of comparisons between automatically and manually scaled data are shown for both programs highlighting the different behaviours. The Autoscala and ARTIST 4.5 values of foF2 and MUF(3000)F2 both agree with the hand-scaled values for ~95% of ionograms. For the other ~5% of ionograms, which the manual scaler classed as unscalable, ARTIST 4.5 usually gave invalid results, whereas Autoscala usually gave no result. The data recorded by the ionosondes DPS4 (interpreted by ARTIST 4.5) and AIS-INGV (interpreted by Autoscala) during 3 geomagnetic storms were also analysed. Ionograms with typical errors both for Autoscala and ARTIST 4.5 are displayed.

DuCharme, E. D., L. E. Petrie, and R. Eyfrig (1973),Amethod for predicting the F1 layer critical frequency based on the Zurich smoothed sunspot number, Radio Sci., 8(10), 837–839.

Fox, M. W., and C. Blundell (1989), Automatic scaling of digital ionograms, Radio Sci., 24(6), 747–761.

Gilbert, J. D., and R. W. Smith (1988), A comparison between the automatic ionogram scaling system ARTIST and the standard manual method, Radio Sci., 23(6), 968–974.

Huck, S. W. (2004), Reading Statistics and Research, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Mass. Igi, S., K. Nozaki, M. Nagayama, A. Ohtani, H. Kato, and K. Igarashi (1993), Automatic ionogram processing systems in Japan, in Proceedings of Session G6 at the XXIVth General Assembly of the International Union of Radio Science (URSI), Kyoto, Japan, August 25 - September 2, Int. Union of Radio Sci., Ghent, Belgium.

Jacobs, L., A. W. V. Poole, and L. A. McKinnel (2004), An analysis of automatically scaled F1 layer data over Grahamstown, South Africa, Adv. Space Res., 34, 1949–1952.

McNamara, L. F. (2006), Quality figures and errors bars for autoscaled Digisonde vertical incidence ionograms, Radio Sci., 41, RS4011, doi:10.1029/2005RS003440.

Pezzopane, M., and C. Scotto (2004), Software for the automatic scaling of critical frequency foF2 and MUF(3000)F2 from ionograms applied at the Ionospheric Observatory of Gibilmanna, Ann. Geophys. Italy, 47(6), 1783–1790.

Pezzopane, M., and C. Scotto (2005), The INGV software for the automatic scaling of foF2 and MUF(3000)F2 from ionograms: A performance comparison with ARTIST 4.01 from Rome data, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 67(12), 1063–1073.

Reinisch, B. W., and X. Huang (1983), Automatic calculation of electron density profiles from digital ionograms: 3. Processing of bottomside ionograms, Radio Sci., 18(3), 477– 492.

Reinisch, B. W., X. Huang, I. A. Galkin, V. Paznukhov, and A. Kozlov (2005), Recent advances in real-time analysis of ionograms and ionospheric drift measurements with digisondes, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 67(12), 1054–1062.

Scotto, C., and M. Pezzopane (2002), A software for automatic scaling of foF2 and MUF(3000)F2 from ionograms, in Proceedings of URSI 2002, Maastricht, 17 –24 August [CDROM], Int. Union of Radio Sci. Ghent, Belgium.

Tsai, L. C., and F. T. Berkey (2000), Ionogram analysis using fuzzy segmentation and connectedness techniques, Radio Sci., 35(5), 1173–1186.

Zolesi, B., L. R. C¸ ander, and G. De Franceschi (1996), On the potential applicability of the Simplified Ionospheric Regional Model to different midlatitude areas, Radio Sci., 31(3), 547–552.