Options
Florida State Univ, COAPS, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
1 results
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
- PublicationOpen AccessNorth Atlantic simulations in Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments phase II (CORE-II). Part I: Mean states(2014-01)
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;Danabasoglu, G.; NCAR, Boulder, CO USA ;Yeager, S. G.; NCAR, Boulder, CO USA ;Bailey, D.; NCAR, Boulder, CO USA ;Behrens, E.; GEOMAR, Helmholtz Ctr Ocean Res, Kiel, Germany ;Bentsen, M.; Uni Res Ltd, Uni Climate, Bergen, Norway ;Bi, D.; CSIRO, Ctr Australian Weather & Climate Res, Melbourne, Australia ;Biastoch, A.; GEOMAR, Helmholtz Ctr Ocean Res, Kiel, Germany ;Boening, C.; GEOMAR, Helmholtz Ctr Ocean Res, Kiel, Germany ;Bozec, A.; Florida State Univ, COAPS, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA ;Canuto, V. M.; NASA, Goddard Inst Space Studies, New York, NY 10025 USA ;Cassou, C.; CERFACS, Toulouse, France ;Chassignet, E.; Florida State Univ, COAPS, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA ;Coward, A. C.; NOCS, Southampton, Hants, England ;Danilov, S.; Alfred Wegener Inst Polar & Marine Res AWI, Bremerhaven, Germany ;Diansky, N.; Russian Acad Sci, Inst Numer Math, Moscow, Russia ;Drange, H.; Univ Bergen, Bergen, Norway ;Farneti, R.; Abdus Salaam Int Ctr Theoret Phys, Trieste, Italy ;Fernandez, E.; CERFACS, Toulouse, France ;Fogli, P. G.; Ctr Euro Mediterraneo Cambiamenti Climatici CMCC, Bologna, Italy ;Forget, G.; MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA ;Fujii, Y.; Japan Meteorol Agcy, MRI, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan ;Griffies, S. M.; NOAA, GFDL, Princeton, NJ USA ;Gusev, A.; Russian Acad Sci, Inst Numer Math, Moscow, Russia ;Heimbach, P.; MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA ;Howard, A.; CUNY Medgar Evers Coll, Brooklyn, NY 11225 USA ;Jung, T.; Alfred Wegener Inst Polar & Marine Res AWI, Bremerhaven, Germany ;Kelley, M.; NOAA, GFDL, Princeton, NJ USA ;Large, W. G.; NCAR, Boulder, CO USA ;Leboissetier, A.; NASA, Goddard Inst Space Studies, New York, NY 10025 USA ;Lu, J.; Florida State Univ, COAPS, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA ;Madec, G.; CNRS IRD UPMC, IPSL LOCEAN, Paris, France ;Marsland, S. J.; CSIRO, Ctr Australian Weather & Climate Res, Melbourne, Australia CSIRO, Bur Meteorol, Melbourne, Australia ;Masina, S.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia ;Navarra, A.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia ;Nurser, A. J. G.; NOCS, Southampton, Hants, England ;Pirani, A.; Natl Oceanog Ctr, Int CLIVAR Project Off, Southampton, Hants, England ;Salas y Melia, D.; CNRM, Toulouse, France ;Samuels, B. L.; NOAA, GFDL, Princeton, NJ USA ;Scheinert, M.; GEOMAR, Helmholtz Ctr Ocean Res, Kiel, Germany ;Sidorenko, D.; Alfred Wegener Inst Polar & Marine Res AWI, Bremerhaven, German ;Treguier, A.; IUEM, CNRS Ifremer IRD UBO, UMR 6523, Lab Phys Oceans, Plouzane, France ;Tsujino, H.; Japan Meteorol Agcy, MRI, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan ;Uotila, P.; CSIRO, Ctr Australian Weather & Climate Res, Melbourne, Australia ;Valcke, S.; CERFACS, Toulouse, France ;Voldoire, A.; CNRM, Toulouse, France ;Wangi, Q.; Alfred Wegener Inst Polar & Marine Res AWI, Bremerhaven, Germany; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; Simulation characteristics from eighteen global ocean–sea-ice coupled models are presented with a focus on the mean Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) and other related fields in the North Atlantic. These experiments use inter-annually varying atmospheric forcing data sets for the 60- 1 Please note that this is an author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available on the publisher Web site year period from 1948 to 2007 and are performed as contributions to the second phase of the Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments (CORE-II). The protocol for conducting such CORE-II experiments is summarized. Despite using the same atmospheric forcing, the solutions show significant differences. As most models also differ from available observations, biases in the Labrador Sea region in upper-ocean potential temperature and salinity distributions, mixed layer depths, and sea-ice cover are identified as contributors to differences in AMOC. These differences in the solutions do not suggest an obvious grouping of the models based on their ocean model lineage, their vertical coordinate representations, or surface salinity restoring strengths. Thus, the solution differences among the models are attributed primarily to use of different subgrid scale parameterizations and parameter choices as well as to differences in vertical and horizontal grid resolutions in the ocean models. Use of a wide variety of sea-ice models with diverse snow and sea-ice albedo treatments also contributes to these differences. Based on the diagnostics considered, the majority of the models appear suitable for use in studies involving the North Atlantic, but some models require dedicated development effort.483 292