Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/9878
AuthorsGasperini, P.* 
Lolli, B.* 
Castellaro, S.* 
TitleComparative analysis of regression method used for seismic magnitude conversions
Issue DateApr-2015
Series/Report no.3/115 (2015)
DOI10.1785/0120150018
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/9878
Keywordsmagnitude conversions, orthogonal regression
Subject Classification05. General::05.06. Methods::05.06.99. General or miscellaneous 
AbstractThe magnitude conversion problem, usually concerning the estimation of proxies of moment magnitude Mw from local (ML) and teleseismic (Ms and mb) mag- nitude estimates, was addressed by a number of recent articles. In most of them, the general orthogonal regression (GOR) method is employed; in place of the ordinary least squares (OLS), owing to the fact that the errors of local and teleseismic magnitudes are not negligible with respect to those of Mw. In the last two years, researchers proposed a modified GOR (MGOR) procedure that claimed to achieve unbiased estimates of Mw using an estimator of the true value of the independent variable (xt) in place of the observed value (Xobs) in regressed equations. In this article, we demonstrate both theo- retically and experimentally that (a) xt coincides on average with Xobs, (b) the proposed procedure to calculate xt is biased by the choice of using the OLS regression method to fit the linear relationship between xt and Xobs, and (c) the claimed better fit of MGOR proxies with observed data is due to the use of goodness-of-fit estimators that neglect the error of the independent variable. In particular, we show the regression method that best minimizes such estimators is the OLS, which assumes that the error of the independent variable is negligible. This, however, does not mean that the OLS is the better approach for computing conversion equations between different magnitudes; because, owing to the presence of errors of the independent variable, it is simply not applicable to mag- nitude conversion as well as the MGOR procedure.
Appears in Collections:Papers Published / Papers in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
18_Gasperini_Lolli_Castellaro_2015_print.pdfmain article177.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

184
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Jul 25, 2017

Download(s)

82
checked on Jul 25, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric