Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/9589
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallDahm, T.; GFZ-Potsdamen
dc.contributor.authorallCesca, S.; GFZ-Potsdamen
dc.contributor.authorallHainzl, S.; GFZ-Potsdamen
dc.contributor.authorallBraun, T.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallKrueger, F.; Uni-Potsdamen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-14T12:42:34Zen
dc.date.available2015-05-14T12:42:34Zen
dc.date.issued2015-04-13en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/9589en
dc.description.abstractEarthquakes occurring close to hydrocarbon fields under production are often under critical view of being induced or triggered. However, clear and testable rules to discriminate the different events have rarely been developed and tested. The unresolved scientific problem may lead to lengthy public disputes with unpredictable impact on the local acceptance of the exploitation and field operations. We propose a quantitative approach to discriminate induced, triggered and natural earthquakes, which is based on testable input parameters. Maxima of occurrence probabilities are compared for the cases under question, and a single probability of being triggered or induced is reported. The uncertainties of earthquake location and other input parameters are considered in terms of the integration over probability density functions (pdf). The probability that events have been human-triggered/induced is derived from the modeling of Coulomb stress changes and a rate and state dependent seismicity model. In our case a 3D boundary element method has been adapted for the nuclei of strain approach to estimate the stress changes outside the reservoir, which are related to pore pressure changes in the field formation. The predicted rate of natural earthquakes is either derived from the background seismicity or, in case of rare events, from an estimate of the tectonic stress rate. Instrumentally derived, seismological information on the event location, source mechanism and the size of the rupture plane is of advantage for the method. If the rupture plane has been estimated, the discrimination between induced or only triggered events is theoretically possible if probability functions are convolved with a rupture fault filter. We apply the approach to three recent main-shock events: (1) the Mw 4.3 Ekofisk 2001, North Sea earthquake close to the Ekofisk oil field, the 2004 Mw 4.4 Rotenburg, Northern Germany earthquake in the vicinity of the Söhlingen gas field, and the Mw 6.1 Emilia 2012, Northern Italy earthquake in the vicinity of a hydrocarbon reservoir. The three test cases cover the complete range of possible causes: clearly “human-induced”, “not even human-triggered” and a third case in-between both extremes.en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisher.nameAmerican Geophysical Unionen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of geophysical research - solid earthen
dc.relation.ispartofseries4/120 (2015)en
dc.subjectInduced seismicityen
dc.subjectprobabilistic discriminationen
dc.subjecthydrocarbon fielden
dc.subjecttriggered earthquakeen
dc.subjectseismic hazarden
dc.subjectearthquakeen
dc.titleDiscrimination between induced, triggered and natural earthquakes close to hydrocarbon reservoirs: A probabilistic approach based on the modeling of depletion-induced stress changes and seismological source parameters.en
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.description.pagenumber2491–2509en
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.02. Earthquake interactions and probabilityen
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/2014JB011778en
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico6T. Sismicità indotta e caratterizzazione sismica dei sistemi naturalien
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.description.fulltextrestricteden
dc.relation.issn0148-0227en
dc.contributor.authorDahm, T.en
dc.contributor.authorCesca, S.en
dc.contributor.authorHainzl, S.en
dc.contributor.authorBraun, T.en
dc.contributor.authorKrueger, F.en
dc.contributor.departmentGFZ-Potsdamen
dc.contributor.departmentGFZ-Potsdamen
dc.contributor.departmentGFZ-Potsdamen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentUni-Potsdamen
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptGFZ Geoforschungszentrum Potsdam-
crisitem.author.deptGFZ - Potsdam, Germany-
crisitem.author.deptDeutschelGeoForschungsZentrum-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptInst. of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Potsdam University, Potsdam, Germany-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2875-0933-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1778-1328-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
Dahm_et_al-2015-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Solid_Earth.pdf1.86 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

35
checked on Feb 10, 2021

Page view(s) 50

299
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s)

32
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric