Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/9552
AuthorsHigueras, P.* 
Oyarzun, R.* 
Kotnik, J.* 
Esbrı´, J. M.* 
Martìnez-Coronado, A.* 
Horvat, M.* 
Lòpez-Berdonces, M. A.* 
Llanos, W.* 
Vaselli, O.* 
Nisi, B.* 
Mashyanov, N.* 
Ryzov, V.* 
Spiric, Z.* 
Panichev, N.* 
McCrindle, R.* 
Feng, X.* 
Fu, X.* 
Lillo, J.* 
Loredo, J.* 
Garcìa, M. E.* 
Alfonso, P.* 
Villegas, K.* 
Palacios, S.* 
Oyarzu´n, J.* 
Maturana, H.* 
Contreras, F.* 
Adams, M.* 
Ribeiro-Guevara, S.* 
Niecenski, L. P.* 
Giammanco, S.* 
Huremovic´, J.* 
TitleA compilation of field surveys on gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) from contrasting environmental settings in Europe, South America, South Africa and China: separating fads from facts
Issue Date31-Dec-2013
Series/Report no.4/36(2013)
DOI10.1007/s10653-013-9591-2
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/9552
KeywordsGaseous elemental mercury
Atmospheric pollution
Mining districts
Cities
Pristine locations
Volcanos
Hazards
Risks
Subject Classification05. General::05.08. Risk::05.08.01. Environmental risk 
AbstractMercury is transported globally in the atmosphere mostly in gaseous elemental form (GEM, Hg0 gas), but still few worldwide studies taking into account different and contrasted environmental settings are available in a single publication. This work presents and discusses data from Argentina, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Chile, China, Croatia, Finland, Italy, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Slovenia and Venezuela. We classified the information in four groups: (1) mining districts where this contaminant poses or has posed a risk for human populations and/or ecosystems; (2) cities, where the concentration ofatmospheric mercury could be higher than normal due to the burning of fossil fuels and industrial activities; (3) areas with natural emissions from volcanoes; and (4) pristine areas where no anthropogenic influence was apparent. All the surveys were performed using portable LUMEX RA-915 series atomic absorption spectrometers. The results for cities fall within a low GEM concentration range that rarely exceeds 30 ng m-3, that is, 6.6 times lower than the restrictive ATSDR threshold (200 ng m-3) for chronic exposure to this pollutant. We also observed this behavior in the former mercury mining districts, where few data were above 200 ng m-3.We noted that high concentrations of GEM are localized phenomena that fade away in short distances. However, this does not imply that they do not pose a risk for those working in close proximity to the source. This is the case of the artisanal gold miners that heat the Au–Hg amalgam to vaporize mercury. In this respect, while GEM can be truly regarded as a hazard, because of possible physical–chemical transformations into other species, it is only under these localized conditions, implying exposure to high GEM concentrations, which it becomes a direct risk for humans.
Appears in Collections:Papers Published / Papers in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Higueras et al 2013.pdfMain article1.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

Page view(s)

174
checked on May 26, 2017

Download(s)

72
checked on May 26, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric