Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/9412
AuthorsZonno, Gaetano* 
Azzaro, Raffaele* 
Meroni, Fabrizio* 
D'Amico, Salvatore* 
Tuvè, Tiziana* 
Ferreira, Monica* 
Mota de Sà, Francisco* 
Oliveira, Carlos* 
Brambilla, Carla* 
Rotondi, Renata* 
Varini, Elisa* 
TitleApplying the Disruption Index procedure to evaluate the urban seismic risk in the Mt. Etna area (Italy)
Issue DateSep-2014
PublisherEngineering Geology for Society and Territory, 5
DOI10.1007/978-3-319-09048-1_71
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/9412
KeywordsDisruption Index, Mt. Etna Volcano
Subject Classification04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.11. Seismic risk 
AbstractThe Disruption Index is used here for the assessment of urban disruption in the Mt. Etna area after a natural disaster. The first element of the procedure is the definition of the seismic input, which is based on information about the historical seismicity and seismogenic faults. The second element is the computation of the seismic impact on the building stock and infrastructure in the region considered. Information on urban-scale vulnerability was collected and a geographic information system was used to organize the data relating to buildings and network systems (e. g., typologies, schools, strategic structures, lifelines). The central idea underlying the definition of the Disruption Index is the identification and evaluation of the impacts on a target community, considering the physical elements that contribute most to the severe disruption. The results of this study are therefore very useful for earthquake preparedness planning and for the development of strategies to minimize the risks from earthquakes. This study is a product of the European “Urban Disaster Prevention Strategies using Macroseismic Fields and Fault Sources” project (UPStrat-MAFA European project 2013).
Appears in Collections:Conference materials

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Zonno et al 2014 - IAEG Torino.pdf1.62 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

98
checked on Apr 27, 2017

Download(s)

84
checked on Apr 27, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric