Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/9273
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallSandron, D.; OGS, Istituto Nazionale di Oceanografia e Geofisica Sperimentale, 34010 Sgonico (Trieste), Italyen
dc.contributor.authorallLoreto, M. F.; ISMAR-CNR U.O.S. Bologna, Via Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italyen
dc.contributor.authorallFracassi, U.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallTiberi, L.; Dipartimento di Matematica e Geoscienze, Università degli studi di Trieste, Via Weiss 4, 34129 Trieste, Italyen
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-19T14:49:31Zen
dc.date.available2015-01-19T14:49:31Zen
dc.date.issued2015en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/9273en
dc.description.abstractThe destructive earthquake (M 7) that struck western Calabria (southern Italy) on 8 September 1905 profoundly hit a broad region, also generating a feeble tsunami. For all the damage it caused, this event was as much studied as not fully explained. Literature source models are numerous and diverse, in fault geometry, location, and associated magnitude. They also differ in nature, since these solutions are either field- based, or deriving from tsunami modeling, and macroseismic data inversion. Most. Neither all of these literature source models are not consistent with the damage pattern caused by the 1905 earthquake. To contribute to the identification of the seismogenic source of this destructive event, we performed a series of ground shaking scenarios, based on different faults that various authors associated with this event. The only documented data available suitable for our comparative purposes are the macroseismic intensities associated with localities affected by the event. We transformed the values of ground motion we computed for the same datapoints into intensities. We then attributed a quantitative fit to each modeled seismogenic source, evaluated with the quadratic sum of residuals between observed and calculated intensities. Our results show that two out of 7 literature source models are compatible with the damage distribution caused by the 1905 earthquake. The different parameters and boundary conditions constraining these two solutions suggest that either seismogenic source should include further complexities. Alternatively, since these two sources are antithetic and partially form a graben, they might have kinematically interacted, if passively, on 8 September 1905.en
dc.description.sponsorshipProject ISTEGE: “Indagine Sismotettonica del TErremoto dell'8 Settembre 1905 (Mw 7.4) nel Golfo di Sant'Eufemia – offshore tirrenico calabrese”, supported by OGS (Istituto Nazionale di Oceanografia e di Geofisica Sperimentale); Project RITMARE, funded by Dipartimento della Protezione Civile (Italy's National Civil Protection).en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisher.nameSeismological Society of Americaen
dc.relation.ispartofBulletin of the Seismological Society of Americaen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2A/105 (2015)en
dc.subjectShaking scenariosen
dc.subjectSeismogenic sourcesen
dc.subject1905 earthquakeen
dc.subjectSouthern Italyen
dc.titleShaking scenarios from multiple source models shed light on the Mw 7 Calabria 8 September 1905 earthquake (S Italy)en
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.description.pagenumber912-927en
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.03. Earthquake source and dynamicsen
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.04. Ground motionen
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.11. Seismic risken
dc.subject.INGV05. General::05.01. Computational geophysics::05.01.04. Statistical analysisen
dc.identifier.doi10.1785/0120140044en
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico3T. Pericolosità sismica e contributo alla definizione del rischioen
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.description.fulltextreserveden
dc.relation.issn0037-1106en
dc.relation.eissn1943-3573en
dc.contributor.authorSandron, D.en
dc.contributor.authorLoreto, M. F.en
dc.contributor.authorFracassi, U.en
dc.contributor.authorTiberi, L.en
dc.contributor.departmentOGS, Istituto Nazionale di Oceanografia e Geofisica Sperimentale, 34010 Sgonico (Trieste), Italyen
dc.contributor.departmentISMAR-CNR U.O.S. Bologna, Via Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italyen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentDipartimento di Matematica e Geoscienze, Università degli studi di Trieste, Via Weiss 4, 34129 Trieste, Italyen
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextreserved-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Oceanografia e di Geofisica Sperimentale, Borgo Grotta Gigante 42/c, 34010 Sgonico (TS), Italy-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto di Scienze Marine – Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Bologna, Italy-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptDipartimento di Matematica e Geoscienze, Università degli studi di Trieste, Via Weiss 4, 34129 Trieste, Italy-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1960-8684-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-7102-514X-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.classification.parent05. General-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
BSSA-Sandron_accepted.pdfAccepted manuscript4.24 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
checked on Feb 10, 2021

Page view(s) 50

693
checked on Mar 27, 2024

Download(s)

40
checked on Mar 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric