Earth-prints repository, logo   DSpace

About DSpace Software
|earth-prints home page | roma library | bologna library | catania library | milano library | napoli library | palermo library
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Authors: Cocco, M.*
Cultrera, G.*
Amato, A.*
Braun, T.*
Cerase, A.*
Margheriti, L.*
Bonaccorso, A.*
Demartin, M..*
De Martini, P. M.*
Galadini, F.*
Meletti, C.*
Nostro, C.*
Pacor, F.*
Pantosti, D.*
Pondrelli, S.*
Quareni, F.*
Todesco, M.*
Title: The L'Aquila trial
Title of journal: Geoethics: The Role and Responsibility of Geoscientists
Series/Report no.: Special Publications, 419/(2015)
Publisher: Geological Society, London
Issue Date: 2015
DOI: 10.1144/SP419.13
Keywords: L’Aquila earthquake
risk communication
criminal responsibility
Abstract: The first stage of the trial in L’Aquila (Italy) ended with a conviction of seven experts, convened by the head of Civil Protection on 31 March 2009, for multiple manslaughter and serious injuries. They were sentenced to six years in jail, perpetual interdiction from public office and a fine of several million euros to be paid to the victims of the earthquake of 6 April 2009 (moment magnitude 6.3) for having caused, by their negligent conduct, the death of 29 persons and the injury of several others. The verdict had a tremendous impact on the scientific community and on the way scientists deliver their expert opinions to decision makers and society. This paper analyses the scientific argumentations reported in the Verdict Motivations, where scientific data and results were largely debated and misused to demonstrate that they should have been considered a tool to predict an impending large earthquake. Moreover, we show that the supposed message of reassurance was not generated at the experts’ meeting or by the official Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia reports. The media had a key role in conveying information during the seismic swarm, contributing to the risk perception. We stress that prevention actions based on seismic hazard knowledge are the best defence against earthquakes.
Appears in Collections:05.09.99. General or miscellaneous
Papers Published / Papers in press

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormatVisibility
Cocco_et_al-Geothics.pdf8.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share this record




Stumble it!



Valid XHTML 1.0! ICT Support, development & maintenance are provided by CINECA. Powered on DSpace Software. CINECA