Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/9149
AuthorsCheloni, D.* 
D'Agostino, N.* 
Selvaggi, G.* 
TitleInterseismic coupling, seismic potential, and earthquake recurrence on the southern front of the Eastern Alps (NE Italy)
Issue Date23-May-2014
Series/Report no.5/119(2014)
DOI10.1002/2014JB010954
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/9149
KeywordsEastern Alps; interseismic coupling; seismotectonics; seismic potential; recurrence time; GPS
Subject Classification04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.11. Seismic risk 
04. Solid Earth::04.07. Tectonophysics::04.07.01. Continents 
04. Solid Earth::04.07. Tectonophysics::04.07.04. Plate boundaries, motion, and tectonics 
04. Solid Earth::04.07. Tectonophysics::04.07.07. Tectonics 
AbstractHere we use continuous GPS observations to document the geodetic strain accumulation across the South-Eastern Alps (NE Italy). We estimate the interseismic coupling on the intracontinental collision thrust fault and discuss the seismic potential and earthquake recurrence. We invert the GPS velocities using the back slip approach to simultaneously estimate the relative angular velocity and the degree of interseismic coupling on the thrust fault that separates the Eastern Alps and the Venetian-Friulian plain. Comparison between the rigid rotation predicted motion and the shortening observed across the area indicates that the South-Eastern Alpine thrust front absorbs about 70% of the total convergence between the Adria and Eurasia plates. The coupling is computed on a north dipping fault following the continuous external seismogenic thrust front of the South-Eastern Alps. The modeled thrust fault is currently locked from the surface to a depth of ≈10 km. The transition zone between locked and creeping portions of the fault roughly corresponds with the belt of microseismicity parallel and to the north of the mountain front. The estimated moment deficit rate is 1.3 ± 0.4 × 1017 Nm/yr. The comparison between the estimated moment deficit and that released historically by the earthquakes suggests that to account for the moment deficit the following two factors or their combination should be considered: (1) a significant part of the observed interseismic coupling is released aseismically and (2) infrequent “large” events with long return period (> 1000 years) and with magnitudes larger than the value assigned to the largest historical events (Mw≈ 6.7).
Appears in Collections:Papers Published / Papers in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
cheloni_etal_JGR_2014.pdfmain article8.19 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

Page view(s)

230
checked on Apr 29, 2017

Download(s)

94
checked on Apr 29, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric