Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/8902
AuthorsLombardo, V.* 
Musacchio, M.* 
Buongiorno, M. F.* 
TitleError analysis of subpixel lava temperature measurements using infrared remotely sensed data
Issue Date2012
Series/Report no./191(2012)
DOI10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05632.x
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/8902
KeywordsRemote sensing, error analysis, IR sensors, sub-pixel temperature, Numerical solutions; Non-linear differential equations; Effusive volcanism; Eruption mechanisms and flow emplacement; Remote sensing of volcanoes; Volcano monitoring
Subject Classification04. Solid Earth::04.08. Volcanology::04.08.06. Volcano monitoring 
AbstractWhen remote sensing users are asked to define their requirements for a new sensor, the big question that always arises is: will the technical specifications meet the scientific requirements? Herein, we discuss quantitative relationships between instrumental spectral and radiometric characteristics and data exploitable for lava flow subpixel temperature analysis. This study was funded within the framework of ESA activities for the IR GMES (Global Monitoring for Environment and Security) element mission requirements in 2005. Subpixel temperature retrieval from satellite infrared data is a well-established method that is well documented in the remote sensing literature. However there is little attention paid to the error analysis on estimated parameters due to atmospheric correction and radiometric accuracy of the sensor. In this study, we suggest the best spectral bands combination to estimate subpixel temperature parameters. We also demonstrate that poor atmospheric corrections may vanish the effectiveness of the most radiometrically accurate instrument.
Appears in Collections:Papers Published / Papers in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2012-Lombardo_et_al_GJI.pdf3.63 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

Page view(s)

35
checked on Apr 24, 2017

Download(s)

17
checked on Apr 24, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric