Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/8639
AuthorsDe Lorenzo, S.* 
Del Pezzo, E.* 
Bianco, F.* 
TitleFrequency dependent Qα and Qβ in the Umbria-Marche (Italy) region using a quadratic approximation of the coda-normalization method
Issue Date2013
Series/Report no.3/193 (2013)
DOI10.1093/gji/ggt088
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/8639
KeywordsSeismic attenuation
coda normalization method
Subject Classification04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.09. Waves and wave analysis 
AbstractThe coda normalization method is one of the most used methods in the inference of attenuation parameters Qα and Qβ . Since, in this method, the geometrical spreading exponent γ is an unknown model parameter, the most part of studies assumes a fixed γ , generally equal to 1. However γ and Q could be also jointly inferred from the non-linear inversion of codanormalized logarithms of amplitudes, but the trade-off between γ and Q could give rise to unreasonable values of these parameters. To minimize the trade-off between γ and Q, an inversion method based on a parabolic expression of the coda-normalization equation has been developed. The method has been applied to the waveforms recorded during the 1997 Umbria-Marche seismic crisis. The Akaike criterion has been used to compare results of the parabolic model with those of the linear model, corresponding to γ = 1. A small deviation from the spherical geometrical spreading has been inferred, but this is accompanied by a significant variation of Qα and Qβ values. For almost all the considered stations, Qα smaller than Qβ has been inferred, confirming that seismic attenuation, in the Umbria-Marche region, is controlled by crustal pore fluids.
Appears in Collections:Papers Published / Papers in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Geophys. J. Int.-2013-de Lorenzo-gji_ggt088.pdfMain article + Figures1.38 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

66
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Jul 24, 2017

Download(s)

26
checked on Jul 24, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric