Earth-prints repository, logo   DSpace

About DSpace Software
|earth-prints home page | roma library | bologna library | catania library | milano library | napoli library | palermo library
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/8108

Authors: Delavaud, E.*
Cotton, F.*
Akkar, S.*
Scherbaum, F.*
Danciu, L.*
Beauval, C.*
Drouet, S.*
Douglas, J.*
Basili, R.*
Sandikkaya, M. A.*
Segou, M.*
Faccioli, E.*
Theodoulidis, N.*
Title: Toward a ground-motion logic tree for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Europe
Title of journal: Journal of Seismology
Series/Report no.: /16 (2012)
Publisher: Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Issue Date: 22-Feb-2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10950-012-9281-z
URL: http://www.springerlink.com/content/73p58627177822n8/
Keywords: GMPE
logic tree
seismic hazard
SHARE
Abstract: The Seismic Hazard Harmonization in Europe (SHARE) project, which began in June 2009, aims at establishing new standards for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in the Euro-Mediterranean region. In this context, a logic tree for ground-motion prediction in Europe has been constructed. Ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs) and weights have been determined so that the logic tree captures epistemic uncertainty in ground-motion prediction for six different tectonic regimes in Europe. Here we present the strategy that we adopted to build such a logic tree. This strategy has the particularity of combining two complementary and independent approaches: expert judgment and data testing. A set of six experts was asked to weight pre-selected GMPEs while the ability of these GMPEs to predict available data was evaluated with the method of Scherbaum et al. (Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:3234–3247, 2009). Results of both approaches were taken into account to commonly select the smallest set of GMPEs to capture the uncertainty in ground-motion prediction in Europe. For stable continental regions, two models, both from eastern North America, have been selected for shields, and three GMPEs from active shallow crustal regions have been added for continental crust. For subduction zones, four models, all non-European, have been chosen. Finally, for active shallow crustal regions, we selected four models, each of them from a different host region but only two of them were kept for long periods. In most cases, a common agreement has been also reached for the weights. In case of divergence, a sensitivity analysis of the weights on the seismic hazard has been conducted, showing that once the GMPEs have been selected, the associated set of weights has a smaller influence on the hazard.
Appears in Collections:Papers Published / Papers in press
04.06.11. Seismic risk
04.06.04. Ground motion

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormatVisibility
2012_Delavaud_etal_JOSE-PrintedVersion.pdfmain post-print article587.68 kBAdobe PDFonly authorized users View/Open

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


Share this record
Del.icio.us

Citeulike

Connotea

Facebook

Stumble it!

reddit


 

Valid XHTML 1.0! ICT Support, development & maintenance are provided by CINECA. Powered on DSpace Software. CINECA