Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/7558
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallPasolini, C.; Università di Bolognaen
dc.contributor.authorallAlbarello, D.; Università di Sienaen
dc.contributor.authorallGasperini, P.; Università di Bolognaen
dc.contributor.authorallD'Amico, V.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallLolli, B.; Università di Bolognaen
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-26T08:28:10Zen
dc.date.available2012-01-26T08:28:10Zen
dc.date.issued2008-04en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/7558en
dc.description.abstractAbstract Several different attenuation models have recently been proposed for the Italian region to characterize the decay of macroseismic intensity with the distance from the source. The significant scatter between these relationships and some significant drawbacks that seem to characterize previous approaches (described in a companion article by Pasolini et al., 2008) suggest that the problem needs to be reconsidered. As a first step toward more detailed analyses in the future, this study aimed at developing an isotropic attenuation relationship for the Italian area. Because this attenuation relationship has to be used primarily in probabilistic seismic hazard assessment, major attention was given to evaluating the attenuation relationship in its complete probabilistic form. Another important aspect of this study was the preliminary evaluation of the intrinsic (i.e., independent of the specific attenuation relationship to be used) scattering of data, which represents the lowest threshold for the residual variance that cannot be explained by the attenuation relationship. Furthermore, the peculiar formal features of intensity data and relevant uncertainties were considered carefully. To reduce possible biases, the completeness of the available database was checked and a suitable data selection procedure was applied. Since epicentral intensity cannot be defined unambiguously from the experimental point of view, the attenuation relationship was scaled with a new variable that is more representative of the earthquake dimension. Several criteria were considered when evaluating competing attenuation formulas (explained variance, Bayesian information criteria, Akaike information criteria, etc.). Statistical uncertainty about empirical parameters was evaluated by using standard approaches and bootstrap simulations. The performance of the selected relationship with respect to a control sample was analyzed by using a distribution-free approach. The resulting equation for the expected intensity I at a site located at epicentral distance R is I IE 0:0086 0:0005 D h 1:037 0:027 ln D ln h ; where D R2 p h2, h 3:91 0:27 km, and IE is the average expected intensity at the epicenter for a given earthquake that can be computed from the intensity data (when available) or by using empirical relationships with the moment magnitude Mw or the epicentral intensity I0 reported by the Italian seismic catalog IE 5:862 0:301 2:460 0:055 Mw; IE 0:893 0:254 1:118 0:033 I0: Comparison of the model standard deviation (S.D.) (0.69 intensity degrees) with the intrinsic one (0.62) indicates that this attenuation equation is not far from being optimal.en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisher.nameSeismological Society of Americaen
dc.relation.ispartofBulletin of the Seismological Society of Americaen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2/98 (2008)en
dc.subjectMacroseismic intensity, Ground motion prediction equationen
dc.titleThe Attenuation of Seismic Intensity in Italy, Part II: Modeling and Validationen
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.description.pagenumber692-708en
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.04. Ground motionen
dc.identifier.doi10.1785/0120070021en
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.description.fulltextreserveden
dc.contributor.authorPasolini, C.en
dc.contributor.authorAlbarello, D.en
dc.contributor.authorGasperini, P.en
dc.contributor.authorD'Amico, V.en
dc.contributor.authorLolli, B.en
dc.contributor.departmentUniversità di Bolognaen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversità di Sienaen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversità di Bolognaen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversità di Bolognaen
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptUniversità di Bologna-
crisitem.author.deptDipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, della Terra e dell’Ambiente, University of Siena-
crisitem.author.deptUniversità di Bologna-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9226-4681-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5314-0563-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-6133-6750-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4186-9055-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
05_pasolini et al._2008_BSSA.pdf480.69 kBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

49
checked on Feb 10, 2021

Page view(s)

264
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s)

43
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric