Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/7469
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallAmeri, G.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Milano-Pavia, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallEmolo, A.; Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, Università degli Studi “Federico II”, Napoli, Italyen
dc.contributor.authorallPacor, F.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Milano-Pavia, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallGallovic, F.; Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Dept. of Geophysics, V Holesovickach 2, Praha 8, 180 00, Czech Republicen
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-23T11:05:50Zen
dc.date.available2012-01-23T11:05:50Zen
dc.date.issued2011-06-01en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/7469en
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we adopt three ground‐motion simulation techniques (EXSIM, Motazedian and Atkinson, 2005, DSM, Pacor et al., 2005 and HIC, Gallovič and Brokešová, 2007), with the aim of investigating the different performances in near‐fault strong‐motion modeling and prediction from past and future events. The test case is the 1980, M 6.9, Irpinia earthquake, the strongest event recorded in Italy. First, we simulate the recorded strong‐motion data and validate the model parameters by computing spectral acceleration and peak amplitudes residual distributions. The validated model is then used to investigate the influence of site effects and to compute synthetic ground motions around the fault. Afterward, we simulate the expected ground motions from scenario events on the Irpinia fault, varying the hypocenters, the rupture velocities and the slip distributions. We compare the median ground motions and related standard deviations from all scenario events with empirical ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs). The synthetic median values are included in the median ± one standard deviation of the considered GMPEs. Synthetic peak ground accelerations show median values smaller and with a faster decay with distance than the empirical ones. The synthetics total standard deviation is of the same order or smaller than the empirical one and it shows considerable differences from one simulation technique to another. We decomposed the total standard deviation into its between‐scenario and within‐scenario components. The larger contribution to the total sigma comes from the latter while the former is found to be smaller and in good agreement with empirical inter‐event variability.en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.relation.ispartofBulletin of the Seismological Society of Americaen
dc.relation.ispartofseries3/101 (2011)en
dc.subjectground-motion simulationen
dc.subject1980 Irpinia earthquakeen
dc.titleGround‐Motion Simulations for the M 6.9 Irpinia 1980 Earthquake (Southern Italy) and Scenario Eventsen
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.description.pagenumber1136-1151en
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.99. General or miscellaneousen
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.03. Earthquake source and dynamicsen
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.04. Ground motionen
dc.identifier.doi10.1785/0120100231en
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico4.1. Metodologie sismologiche per l'ingegneria sismicaen
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.description.fulltextopenen
dc.contributor.authorAmeri, G.en
dc.contributor.authorEmolo, A.en
dc.contributor.authorPacor, F.en
dc.contributor.authorGallovic, F.en
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentDipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, Università degli Studi “Federico II”, Napoli, Italyen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentCharles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Dept. of Geophysics, V Holesovickach 2, Praha 8, 180 00, Czech Republicen
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptDipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, Università Federico II, Napoli, Italy-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptDipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, Università di Napoli ‘‘Federico II’’; Department of Geophysics, Charles University, Prague-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-8390-4168-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-5745-0414-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Ameri_etal_2011_Accepted.pdfMain article / pre-print3 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 50

29
checked on Feb 7, 2021

Page view(s)

104
checked on Apr 13, 2024

Download(s) 50

299
checked on Apr 13, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric