Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2122/7294
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.authorall | Woessner, J.; ETH, Zurich | en |
dc.contributor.authorall | Hainzl, S.; GFZ, Potsdam | en |
dc.contributor.authorall | Marzocchi, W.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia | en |
dc.contributor.authorall | Werner, M. J.; ETH, Zurich | en |
dc.contributor.authorall | Lombardi, A. M.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia | en |
dc.contributor.authorall | Catalli, F.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia | en |
dc.contributor.authorall | Enescu, B.; GFZ, Potsdam | en |
dc.contributor.authorall | Cocco, M.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia | en |
dc.contributor.authorall | Gerstenberger, M.; GNS, New Zealand | en |
dc.contributor.authorall | Wiemer, S.; ETH, Zurich | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-01-05T09:12:02Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2012-01-05T09:12:02Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2122/7294 | en |
dc.description.abstract | We perform a retrospective forecast experiment on the 1992 Landers sequence comparing the predictive power of commonly used model frameworks for short‐term earthquake forecasting. We compare a modified short‐term earthquake probability (STEP) model, six realizations of the epidemic‐type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model, and four models that combine Coulomb stress changes calculations and rate‐and‐state theory to generate seismicity rates (CRS models). We perform the experiment under the premise of a controlled environment with predefined conditions for the testing region and data for all modelers. We evaluate the forecasts with likelihood tests to analyze spatial consistency and the total amount of forecasted events versus observed data. We find that (1) 9 of the 11 models perform superior compared to a simple reference model, (2) ETAS models forecast the spatial evolution of seismicity best and perform best in the entire test suite, (3) the modified STEP model matches best the total number of events, (4) CRS models can only compete with empirical statistical models by introducing stochasticity in these models considering uncertainties in the finite‐fault source model, and (5) resolving Coulomb stress changes on 3‐D optimally oriented planes is more adequate for forecasting purposes than using the specified receiver fault concept. We conclude that statistical models perform generally better than the tested physics‐based models and parameter value updates using the occurrence of aftershocks generally improve the predictive power in particular for the purely statistical models in space and time. | en |
dc.language.iso | English | en |
dc.publisher.name | American Geophysical Union | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Geophysical Research | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | /116 (2011) | en |
dc.subject | earthquake forecast | en |
dc.title | A retrospective comparative forecast test on the 1992 Landers sequence | en |
dc.type | article | en |
dc.description.status | Published | en |
dc.type.QualityControl | Peer-reviewed | en |
dc.description.pagenumber | B05305 | en |
dc.subject.INGV | 04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.02. Earthquake interactions and probability | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1029/2010JB007846 | en |
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico | 4.2. TTC - Modelli per la stima della pericolosità sismica a scala nazionale | en |
dc.description.journalType | JCR Journal | en |
dc.description.fulltext | reserved | en |
dc.contributor.author | Woessner, J. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Hainzl, S. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Marzocchi, W. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Werner, M. J. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Lombardi, A. M. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Catalli, F. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Enescu, B. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Cocco, M. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Gerstenberger, M. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Wiemer, S. | en |
dc.contributor.department | ETH, Zurich | en |
dc.contributor.department | GFZ, Potsdam | en |
dc.contributor.department | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia | en |
dc.contributor.department | ETH, Zurich | en |
dc.contributor.department | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia | en |
dc.contributor.department | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia | en |
dc.contributor.department | GFZ, Potsdam | en |
dc.contributor.department | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia | en |
dc.contributor.department | GNS, New Zealand | en |
dc.contributor.department | ETH, Zurich | en |
item.openairetype | article | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.grantfulltext | restricted | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
crisitem.author.dept | ETH, Zurich,Switzerland | - |
crisitem.author.dept | DeutschelGeoForschungsZentrum | - |
crisitem.author.dept | ETH, Zurich | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia | - |
crisitem.author.dept | GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia | - |
crisitem.author.dept | GNS | - |
crisitem.author.orcid | 0000-0002-2875-0933 | - |
crisitem.author.orcid | 0000-0002-9114-1516 | - |
crisitem.author.orcid | 0000-0002-8326-7135 | - |
crisitem.author.orcid | 0000-0001-6798-4225 | - |
crisitem.author.parentorg | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia | - |
crisitem.author.parentorg | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia | - |
crisitem.author.parentorg | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia | - |
crisitem.classification.parent | 04. Solid Earth | - |
crisitem.department.parentorg | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia | - |
crisitem.department.parentorg | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia | - |
crisitem.department.parentorg | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia | - |
crisitem.department.parentorg | Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia | - |
Appears in Collections: | Article published / in press |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Existing users please Login |
---|---|---|---|---|
JGR_woessner_etal_11.pdf | 7.05 MB | Adobe PDF |
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
20
59
checked on Feb 10, 2021
Page view(s) 50
178
checked on Mar 27, 2024
Download(s)
16
checked on Mar 27, 2024