Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/6945
AuthorsAkinci, A.* 
Del Pezzo, E.* 
Ibanez, J.* 
TitleSEPARATION OF SCATTERING AND INTRINSIC ATTENUATION IN SOUTHERN SPAIN AND WESTERN ANATOLIA (TURKEY)
Issue DateMay-1995
Series/Report no.2/121
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/6945
KeywordsSeismic scattering
Seismic attenuation
Subject Classification04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.09. Waves and wave analysis 
AbstractWe have obtained a separation of intrinsic and scattering attenuation in two tectonically active areas of the Mediterranean Basin, southern Spain and western Anatolia, using the Multiple-Lapse Time Window Method. In southern Spain, Q(s) is predominant over Q(i) for frequencies lower than 4 Hz; between 4 and 8 Hz, results show similar scattering and intrinsic attenuation. For frequencies higher than 8 Hz, intrinsic attenuation is clearly dominant over scattering. L(e)(-1) does not change uniformly with frequency; it increases until 8 Hz and decreases at frequencies greater than 8 Hz. The integrated energy curves of western Anatolia do not show regular change with distance. For the first energy window (0-15 s), there is a clear increase of the energy with distances between 0 and 80 km, and then a decrease after 80 km. The fit of the experimental data in the full hypocentral distance range is not good. We divided the experimental energy curves into two different segments, 0-80 and 80-170 km. In 0-80 km, B-0 is close to 1 and the L(e)(-1) values are low (0.004-0.013). In the second distance range (80-170 km) intrinsic attenuation is predominant over scattering. Q(s)(-1) is more frequency-dependent than Q(i)(-1):f(-1.47) against f(-1.29). We observed that coda Q(-1) is equal to the observed Q(i)(-1) for intermediate frequencies, in both regions. However, Q(c)(-1) is really similar to Q(s)(-1) for short distances and is between Q(i) and Q(s) for long distances in southern Spain at low frequencies. Q(c) is similar to the observed Q(t) in both regions at high frequencies. The poor fit of the simulated curves with experimental data can be explained by introducing geometrical spreading values different to those used here. It is necessary to improve the model used by taking into account phenomena like non-isotropic scattering, variation of attenuation with depth, the presence of surface waves or a geometrical spreading value different to the theoretical one used.
Appears in Collections:Papers Published / Papers in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Geophysical Journal International 1995 Akinci121.pdfMain Article2.38 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

Page view(s)

62
checked on Apr 28, 2017

Download(s)

24
checked on Apr 28, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check