Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/670
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallRapolla, A.; Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italyen
dc.contributor.authorallBais, G.; Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italyen
dc.contributor.authorallBruno, P. P. G.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione OV, Napoli, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallDi Fiore, V.; Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italyen
dc.date.accessioned2006-02-13T15:25:31Zen
dc.date.available2006-02-13T15:25:31Zen
dc.date.issued2002en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/670en
dc.description.abstractVolcanic areas often show complex behaviour as far as seismic waves propagation and seismic motion at surface are concerned. In fact, the finite lateral extent of surface layers such as lava flows, blocks, differential welding and/or zeolitization within pyroclastic deposits, introduces in the propagation of seismic waves effects such as the generation of surface waves at the edge, resonance in lateral direction, diffractions and scattering of energy, which tend to modify the amplitude as well as the duration of the ground motion. The irregular topographic surface, typical of volcanic areas, also strongly influences the seismic site response. Despite this heterogeneity, it is unfortunately a common geophysical and engineering practice to evaluate even in volcanic environments the subsurface velocity field with monodimensional investigation method (i.e. geognostic soundings, refraction survey, down-hole, etc.) prior to the seismic site response computation which in a such cases is obviously also made with 1D algorithms. This approach often leads to highly inaccurate results. In this paper we use a different approach, i.e. a fully 2D P-wave Çturning rayÈ tomographic survey followed by 2D seismic site response modeling. We report here the results of this approach in three sites located at short distance from Mt. Vesuvius and Campi Flegrei and characterized by overburdens constituted by volcanoclastic deposits with large lateral and vertical variations of their elastic properties. Comparison between 1D and 2D Dynamic Amplification Factor shows in all reported cases entirely different results, both in terms of peak period and spectral contents, as expected from the clear bidimensionality of the geological section. Therefore, these studies suggest evaluating carefully the subsoil geological structures in areas characterized by possible large lateral and vertical variations of the elastic properties in order to reach correct seismic site response curves to be used for engineering projects.en
dc.format.extent558711 bytesen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisher.nameINGVen
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Geophysicsen
dc.relation.ispartofseries6/45 (2002)en
dc.subjectdynamic amplification factoren
dc.subjectseismicen
dc.subjecttomographyen
dc.subjectpyroclastic rocksen
dc.subjectfinite element methoden
dc.titleEarth modeling and estimation of the local seismic ground motion due to site geology in complex volcanoclastic areasen
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.04. Geology::04.04.10. Stratigraphyen
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.04. Ground motionen
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.07. Tomography and anisotropyen
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.description.fulltextopenen
dc.contributor.authorRapolla, A.en
dc.contributor.authorBais, G.en
dc.contributor.authorBruno, P. P. G.en
dc.contributor.authorDi Fiore, V.en
dc.contributor.departmentDipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italyen
dc.contributor.departmentDipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italyen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione OV, Napoli, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentDipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italyen
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptDipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italy-
crisitem.author.deptDipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italy-
crisitem.author.deptCNR, Istituto per l'Ambiente Marino e Costiero, Calata Porta di Massa, 80133 - Napoli-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2622-3037-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Annals of Geophysics
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
779_790 Bais.pdf545.62 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

170
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Download(s) 50

276
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check