Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/6530
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallMeletti, C.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Milano-Pavia, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallD'Amico, V.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Milano-Pavia, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallMartinelli, F.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Milano-Pavia, Milano, Italiaen
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-11T14:58:35Zen
dc.date.available2011-01-11T14:58:35Zen
dc.date.issued2010-11-30en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/6530en
dc.description.abstractThis deliverable represents the result of the activities performed by a working group at INGV. The main object of the Task 3.5 is defined in the Description of Work. This task will produce a homogeneous assessment (possibly multiple models) of the distribution of the expected Maximum Magnitude for earthquakes expected in various tectonic provinces of Europe, to serve as input for the computation and validation of seismic hazard. This goal will be achieved by combining input from earthquake catalogues, regional strain rates, knowledge of active faults and seismogenic zones, as well as the definition of the seismic source zones. As stated above, the maximum magnitude (Mmax) has to be derived by the combination of several products of the Work Package 3. The deadline of the other deliverables is contemporary or subsequent to the scheduled release of the Mmax map; this means that at the moment it is not possible to provide a final map, but only to describe the preliminary work and the delineated approach for getting the final version of the deliverable. In fact the determination of Mmax has to be based on an earthquake catalog and on a seismic source zones (SSZs) model. At the 18-months deadline (the deadline for Deliverable 3.3) the catalog is not yet released in a proper way for the aim of this task and the seismic source zones model is available in a preliminary release. According to the temporal alignment of the deliverables, the SHARE Management Committee decided in the 4th teleconference meeting that an outline of the methods to be used in the PSHA including a review of state-of-the-art Mmax determination practices shall be presented including preliminary examples. This first version is presented here. With both, the final earthquake catalog and source zones models available (D3.1, D3.2 and D3.4), a final version will be released.en
dc.description.sponsorshipIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologiaen
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesD3.3en
dc.subjectMaximum magnitudeen
dc.subjectEuropeen
dc.titleHomogeneous determination of maximum magnitudeen
dc.typereporten
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlUnreferreden
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.11. Seismic risken
dc.relation.referencesAliaj, S., J. Adams, S. Halchuk, E. Sulstarova, V. Peci and B. Muco (2004), Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Maps for Albania, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, August 1-6, 2004, Paper No. 2469 Burkhard, M. and G. Grünthal (2009), Seismic source zone characterization for the seismic hazard assessment project PEGASOS by the Expert Group 2 (EG1b), Swiss J. Geosci., 102, 149–188. Cagnan, Z. and G. B. Tanircan (2010), Seismic hazard assessment for Cyprus, J. Seismol., 14, 225–246. Coppersmith, K.J., R.R. Youngs and Ch. Sprecher (2009), Methodology and main results of seismic source characterization for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: the PEGASOS project, Switzerland. Swiss J. Geosci., 102, 91–105 + 4 papers. CPTI Working Group (2004), Catalogo Parametrico dei Terremoti Italiani, versione 2004 (CPTI04). INGV, Bologna, http://emidius.mi.ingv.it/CPTI. Ellsworth, W. (2003), Appendix D—Magnitude and area data for strike slip earthquakes, in Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities, Earthquake probabilities in the San Francisco Bay region—2002–2031, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 03–214, 6 p. EPAS Working Group: Dominique, P., A. Autran, J. L. Ble`s, D. Fitzenz, F. Samarcq, M. Terrier, M. Cushing, J. C. Gariel, B. Mohammadioun, P. Combes, C. Durouchoux, and X. Goula (1998), Part two: Probabilistic approach: seismic hazard map on the national territory (France), in Proc. of the 11th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paris, France, 6–11 September 1998. Grunthal, G. and GSHAP Region 3 Working Group (1999), Seismic hazard assessment for Central, North and Northwest Europe: GSHAP Region 3, Ann. Geophys., 42(6), 999-1012. Grünthal, G., R. Wahlström, D. Stromeyer (2009), The unified catalogue of earthquakes in central, northern, and northwestern Europe (CENEC) - updated and expanded to the last millennium, J. Seismol., DOI: 10.1007/s10950-008-9144-9 Hamdache M. (1998), Seismic hazard assessment for the main seismogenic zones in north Algeria, Pure Appl. Geophys., 152, 281– 314. Hanks, T.C., and W.H. Bakun (2002), A bilinear source-scaling model for M–log A observations of continental earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., v. 92, p. 1841–1846. Johnston, A.C., K.J. Coppersmith, L.R. Kanter and C.A. Cornell (1994), The earthquakes of stable continental regions – Assessment of large earthquake potential, Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), TR-102261-V1, 2–1-98. Kalkan, E., P. Gulkan, N. Yilmaz and M. Celebi (2009), Reassessment of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard in the Marmara Region, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 99 (4), 2127-2146. doi: 10.1785/0120080285. Kayabali, K. and M. Akin (2003), Seismic hazard map of Turkey using the deterministic approach, Eng. Geology, 69, 127-137. Kijko, A. and G.Graham (1998), Parametric-historic procedure for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Part I: estimation of maximum regional magnitude Mmax, Pure and Applied Geophysics, 152, 413–442. Kijko, A. and M. A.Sellevoll (1989), Estimation of Earthquake Hazard Parameters from Incomplete Data Files. Part I. Utilization of Extreme and Complete Catalogs with Different Threshold Magnitudes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 79 (3), 645–654. Kijko, A. and M. A.Sellevoll (1992), Estimation of Earthquake Hazard Parameters from Incomplete Data Files. Part II. Incorporation of Magnitudes Heterogeneity, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 82 (1), 120–134. Marin, S., J.-P. Avouac, M. Nicolas and A. Schlupp (2004), A probabilistic approach to seismic hazard in metropolitan France, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 94, 2137–2163. Markusic, S.and M. Herak (1999), Seismic zoning of Croatia, Nat. Hazards,18, 269-285. Meletti, C., F. Galadini, G. Valensise, M. Stucchi, R. Basili, S. Barba, G. Vannucci and E. Boschi (2008), A seismic source model for the seismic hazard assessment of the Italian territory,. Tectonophysics, 450(1), 85-108. DOI:10.1016/j.tecto.2008.01.003. Musson, R. M. W. (2000). Generalised seismic hazard maps for the Pannonian Basin using probabilistic methods, Pure Appl. Geophys.,157(1/2), 147-169. Musson, R.M.V., S. Sellami and W. Brüstle (2009), Preparing a seismic hazard model for Switzerland: The view from PEGASOS Expert Group 3 (EG1c), Swiss J.Geosci., 102, 107–120. Papaioannou, Ch. and B. Papazachos (2000), Time independent and time dependent seismic hazard in Greece based on seismogenic sources, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 90, 22-33. Pelaez Montilla, J.A., M. Hamdache and C. Lopez Casado (2003), Seismic hazard in Northern Algeria using spatially smoothed seismicity. Results for peak ground acceleration, Tectonophysics, 372, 105–119. Petersen, M. D., A. D. Frankel, S. C. Harmsen, C. S. Mueller, K. M. Haller, R. L. Wheeler, R. L. Wesson, Y. Zeng, O. S. Boyd, D. M. Perkins, N. Luco, E. H. Field, C. J. Wills and K. S. Rukstales (2008). Documentation for the 2008 Update of the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008–1128, 61 p. Pisarenko, V.F., A.A. Lyubushin, V.B. Lysenko, T.V. Golubeva (1996), Statistical estimation of seismic hazard parameters: maximum possible magnitude and related parameters, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 86, 691–700. Radulian, M., N. Mandrescu, G. F. Panza, E. Popescu and Utale A. (2000), Characterization of seismogenic zones of Romania, Pure Appl. Geophys., 157, 57-77. Jenny, S., S. Goes, D. Giardini and H.-G. Kahle (2004), Earthquake recurrence parameters from seismic and geodetic strain rates in the eastern Mediterranean, Geophys. J. Int., 157, 1331-1347. Jenny, S., S. Goes, D. Giardini and H.-G. Kahle (2006), Seismic potential of Southern Italy, Tectonophysics, 415 (1-4), 81-101, DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2005.12.003. Schmid, S.M. and D.Slejko (2009), Seismic source characterization of the Alpine foreland in the context of a probabilistic seismic hazard analysis by PEGASOS Expert Group 1 (EG1a), Swiss J. Geosci., 102, 121–148. Secanell, R., D. Bertil, C. Martin, X. Goula, T. Susagna, M. Tapia, P. Dominique, D. Carbon and J. Fleta (2008), Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of the Pyrenean region, J. Seismol., 12: 323-341. Secanell, R., X. Goula, T. Susagna, J. Fleta and A. Roca (2004), Seismic hazard zonation of Catalonia, Spain, integrating random uncertainties, J. Seismol,. 8, 25-40. Simeonova, S., D. Solakov, G. Leydecker, H. Busche T., Schmitt and D. Kaiser (2006), Probabilistic seismic hazard map for Bulgaria as a basis for a new building code, Nat. Hazards and Earth System Sci., 6, 881 – 887. Stucchi, M., C. Meletti, V. Montaldo, H. Crowley, G. M. Calvi and E. Boschi (2010), Seismic Hazard Assessment (2003-2009) for the Italian Building Code, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. (submitted). Vilanova, S. P., J.F.B.D. Fonseca (2007), Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Assessment for Portugal, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 97, 1702-1717. Wheeler, R.L. (2009), Methods of Mmax Estimation East of the Rocky Mountains, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009–1018, 44 p. Wiemer, S., M. García-Fernández and J.P. Burg (2009), Development of a seismic source model for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of nuclear power plant sites in Switzerland: the view from PEGASOS Expert Group 4 (EG1d), Swiss J. Geosci., 102, 189–209. Živčić, M., P. Suhadolc, F. Vaccari (2000), Seismic zoning of Slovenia based on deterministic hazard computations, Pure Appl. Geophys., 157, 171–184.en
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico4.2. TTC - Modelli per la stima della pericolosità sismica a scala nazionaleen
dc.description.fulltextopenen
dc.contributor.authorMeletti, C.en
dc.contributor.authorD'Amico, V.en
dc.contributor.authorMartinelli, F.en
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italiaen
item.openairetypereport-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_93fc-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italia-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2571-8345-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-6133-6750-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0014-9417-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Reports
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
D3.3_SHARE.pdfReport of Deliverable 3.3987.57 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 50

292
checked on Mar 27, 2024

Download(s) 20

369
checked on Mar 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check