Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Authors: ||Massa, M.*|
|Title: ||Selection of Empirical Green’s Functions by waveform similarity analysis: an approach to predict ground-motion in areas with saturated records|
|Title of journal: ||Bulletin of Seismological Society of America|
|Series/Report no.: ||4/100 (2010)|
|Issue Date: ||1-Aug-2010|
|Keywords: ||cross-correlation analysis|
empirical Green’s functions
|Abstract: ||This work is focused on a procedure based on selecting suitable Empirical Green’s Functions (EGFs), able to predict ground-motion for moderate earthquakes, in the case where no records are available due to saturation phenomena. The aim of the paper is to generate synthetic seismograms for the 24th November 2004, ML 5.2, Salo’ earthquake (northern Italy), an event capable of saturating all velocimetric stations installed within the first 100 km from the epicenter. The proposed approach uses a waveform similarity analysis, based on the normalized cross correlation technique, and it is able to identify EGFs that represent doublet-events of a target. The ground-motion was finally simulated using the method proposed by Irikura (1986).
In this case, due to the saturation of near-source velocimetric instruments, the normalized cross-correlation matrix was calculated considering the first not saturated velocimetric station (ASO2, 108 km NE to the epicenter), including the same selected portion of signals (on the base of signal-to-noise ratio) related both to the target and to 11 events, with ML ranging from 2.2 to 3.0, occurred in the same area. The similarity analysis, performed through the bridging technique, allows to detect an ML 2.9 aftershock characterized by a meaningful degree of similarity (70%) compared to the target. Given as a fact that if two events are similar for a far-field station they have to be similar also for a near source one, it was in this way possible to use the selected aftershock (doublet), recorded in near source, to reproduce the target for the saturated near-source stations. The results of the simulations were compared with ground-motion values predicted by empirical Ground Motion Prediction Equations (GMPEs), calibrated using both Italian and European data.|
|Appears in Collections:||04.02.06. Seismic methods|
Papers Published / Papers in press
Files in This Item:
|Massa_BSSA_2009.pdf||1.1 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.