Earth-prints repository, logo   DSpace

About DSpace Software
|earth-prints home page | roma library | bologna library | catania library | milano library | napoli library | palermo library
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Authors: Lombardi, A. M.*
Cocco, M.*
Marzocchi, W.*
Title: On the Increase of Background Seismicity Rate during the 1997-1998 Umbria-Marche, Central Italy, Sequence: Apparent Variation or Fluid-Driven Triggering?
Title of journal: On the Increase of Background Seismicity Rate during the 1997-1998 Umbria-Marche, Central Italy, Sequence: Apparent Variation or Fluid-Driven Triggering?
Series/Report no.: 3/100 (2010)
Issue Date: 2010
DOI: 10.1785/0120090077
Keywords: fluids
Abstract: We investigate the temporal evolution of background seismicity rate in the Umbria-Marche sector of the northern Apennines that was struck by the 1997-98 Colfiorito seismic sequence. Specifically we apply the ETAS model to separate the background seismicity rate from the coseismic triggered rate of earthquake production. Analyzed data are extracted from the CSI1.1 catalog of Italian seismicity (1981-2002), which contains for the study area 12.163 events with ML > 1.5. The capability of the ETAS model to match the observed seismicity rate is tested by analyzing the model residuals and by applying two non-parametric statistical tests (the RUNS and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests) to verify the fit of residuals to Poisson hypothesis. We first apply the ETAS model to the seismicity occurred in the study area during the whole period covered by the CSI1.1 catalog. Our results show that the ETAS model does not explain the temporal evolution of seismicity in a time interval defined by change points identified from time-evolution of residuals and encompassing the Colfiorito seismic sequence. We therefore restrict our analysis to this period and analyze only those events belonging to the 1997-1998 seismic sequence. We again obtain the inadequacy of a stationary ETAS model with constant background rate to reproduce the temporal pattern of observed seismicity. We verify that the failure of ETAS model to fit the observed data is caused by the increase of the background seismicity rate associated with the repeated Colfiorito main shocks. We interpret the inferred increase of background rate as a consequence of the perturbation to the coseismic stress field caused by fluid flow and/or pore pressure relaxation. In particular we show that the transient perturbation caused by poroelastic relaxation can explain the temporal increase of background rate that therefore represents a fluid signal in the seismicity pattern.
Appears in Collections:04.06.02. Earthquake interactions and probability
Papers Published / Papers in press

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormatVisibility
Colfio_lombardi_et_al_REV_new.doc.pdf3.06 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share this record




Stumble it!



Valid XHTML 1.0! ICT Support, development & maintenance are provided by CINECA. Powered on DSpace Software. CINECA