|
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2122/6330
|
| Authors: | Bemis, K.* Walker, J.* Borgia, A.* Turrin, B.* Neri, M.* Swisher, C.* |
| Title: | The growth and erosion of cinder cones in Guatemala and El Salvador: Models and statistics |
| Title of journal: | Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research |
| Publisher: | Elsevier B.V. |
| Issue Date: | 2010 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2010.11.007 |
| Keywords: | cinder cones morphology age dating |
| Abstract: | Morphologic data for 147 cinder cones in southernGuatemala andwestern El Salvador are comparedwith data from 21
the San Francisco volcanic field, Arizona (USA), Cima volcanic field, California (USA), Michoácan–Guanajuato 22
volcanic field, Mexico, and the Lamongan volcanic field, East Java. The Guatemala cones have an average height of 23
110+/−50m, an average basal diameter of 660+/−230m and an average top diameter of 180+/−150m. The 24
generalmorphology of these cones can be described by their average cone angle of slope (24+/−7), average height- 25
to-radius ratio (0.33+/−0.09) and their flatness (0.24+/−0.18). Although the mean values for the Guatemalan 26
cones are similar to those for other volcanic fields (e.g., San Francisco volcanic field, Arizona; Cima volcanic field, 27
California; Michoácan–Guanajuato volcanic field, Mexico; and Lamongan volcanic field, East Java), the range of 28
morphologies encompasses almost all of those observed worldwide for cinder cones. 29
Three new 40Ar/39Ar age dates are combined with 19 previously published dates for cones in Guatemala and El 30
Salvador. There is no indication that the morphologies of these cones have changed over the last 500–1000 ka. 31
Furthermore, a re-analysis of published data for other volcanic fields suggests that only in the Cima volcanic field (of 32
those studied) is there clear evidence of degradation with age. 33
Preliminary results of a numerical model of cinder cone growth are used to show that the range of morphologies 34
observed in the Guatemalan cinder cones could all be primary, that is, due to processes occurring at the time of 35
eruption. |
| Appears in Collections: | 04.08.99. General or miscellaneous Papers Published / Papers in press 05.02.03. Volcanic eruptions 04.08.03. Magmas 04.08.08. Volcanic risk 05.02.99. General or miscellaneous 04.08.05. Volcanic rocks
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | Visibility |
| VOLGEO_4653_corrected.pdf | uncorrected proof | 3.71 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open
|
|
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|