Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/6241
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallDe Santis, A.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallCianchini, G.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallQamili, E.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallFrepoli, A.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione CNT, Roma, Italiaen
dc.date.accessioned2010-11-16T07:26:50Zen
dc.date.available2010-11-16T07:26:50Zen
dc.date.issued2010-10en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/6241en
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we demonstrate that the seismic sequence of foreshocks culminating with the recent Mw=6.3 main shock on April 6, 2009 in L'Aquila (Central Italy) evolved as a chaotic process. To do this, we apply a nonlinear retrospective prediction to this seismic sequence and look at the temporal behaviour of the error between predicted and actual occurrence of the main shock when gradually increasing parts of the sequence are considered. This is a generalisation of the typical nonlinear approach which is quite powerful to detect chaos in relatively short time series. The method of prediction is based on the Accelerated Strain Release (ASR) analysis in time and on the nonlinear forecasting approach in a reconstructed phase space. We find that i) the temporal decay of the prediction error is consistent with an exponential function with a time constant τ of about 10 days and ii) at around 6 days before the main shock, ASR analysis is quite powerful for anticipating the time of occurrence with an uncertainty of about a day. Due to its retrospective characteristics, the latter result could be affected by changes on some a-priori parameters used in the application of the ASR technique. However, we consider these findings, together with those obtained from the phase-space analysis, to be strong evidence that the studied sequence of foreshocks was produced by a physical process dominated by a significant chaotic component characterised by a K-entropy=1/τ of about 0.1 day−1. This result could have important implications for the predictability of the possible main shock for those seismic sequences showing analogous nonlinear chaotic properties.en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisher.nameElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofTectonophysicsen
dc.relation.ispartofseries1-4/496 (2010)en
dc.subjectSeismic sequenceen
dc.subjectChaotic processen
dc.subjectAccelerated Strain Releaseen
dc.subjectNonlinear predictionen
dc.subjectPhase-space reconstructionen
dc.titleThe 2009 L'Aquila (Central Italy) seismic sequence as a chaotic processen
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.03. Earthquake source and dynamicsen
dc.subject.INGV05. General::05.01. Computational geophysics::05.01.04. Statistical analysisen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tecto.2010.10.005en
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico3.1. Fisica dei terremotien
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.description.fulltextreserveden
dc.contributor.authorDe Santis, A.en
dc.contributor.authorCianchini, G.en
dc.contributor.authorQamili, E.en
dc.contributor.authorFrepoli, A.en
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione ONT, Roma, Italiaen
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione ONT, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3941-656X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2832-0068-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2211-3909-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.classification.parent05. General-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
De Santis etal_Tectono2010.pdf1.14 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 10

27
checked on Feb 10, 2021

Page view(s) 20

366
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Download(s)

46
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric