Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/604
AuthorsStramondo, S.* 
Cinti, F. R.* 
Dragoni, M.* 
Salvi, S.* 
Santini, S.* 
TitleThe August 17, 1999 Izmit, Turkey, earthquake: slip distribution from dislocation modeling of DInSAR and surface offset
Issue DateJun-2002
Series/Report no.N. 3/4, vol. 45 (2002)
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/604
Keywords1999 Izmit earthquake
Differential SAR Interferometry
coseismic displacement field
Montecarlo method
Subject Classification04. Solid Earth::04.03. Geodesy::04.03.07. Satellite geodesy 
AbstractWe show the results of application of Differential SAR Interferometry to the MW 7.4, August 17, 1999, Izmit earthquake, Western Turkey. The differential interferogram is obtained using an interferometric ERS2 ascending pair with a time interval of 35 days (August 13th - September 17th). The fringe pattern clearly defines the coseismic displacement field extended in an area of about 100 km N-S and 120 km E-W. The analysis of the interferogram shows the right-lateral strike-slip movement on the activated section of the North Anatolian fault system. The maximum SAR-detected displacement ranges between 117.6 cm and 134.4 cm in the proximity of Gölcük. We invert SAR data for uniform dislocation on a single fault plane using a Montecarlo procedure, with the aim of testing a large set of a priori possible asperity distributions on the fault. We then use a forward modeling approach to evaluate the slip variability for the dislocation using additional constraints as surface offsets and seismicity distribution: in this case we allow unit cells to undergo different values of slip in order to refine the initial dislocation model. Misfits between SAR data and modeled slant range displacements are generally low for all our models (~ 12 cm). Our results indicate that slip is concentrated in the central-western part of the fault, in the upper 10-15 km, tapering to the fault tips. For the Izmit case, we note that a well constrained fault model can be obtained only integrating DInSAR data with additional observations. This is mainly due to an undersampling of the displacement field by DInSAR, caused by decorrelation and lack of image data.
Appears in Collections:Papers Published / Papers in press
Manuscripts
Annals of Geophysics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
AnnalsStrametal.pdf380.13 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

108
checked on May 26, 2017

Download(s)

320
checked on May 26, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check