|
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2122/5997
|
| Authors: | Applegarth, L. J.* Pinkerton, H.* James, M. R.* Calvari, S.* |
| Title: | Lava flow superposition: The reactivation of flow units in compound ’a’a flows |
| Title of journal: | Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research |
| Series/Report no.: | 4/194 (2010) |
| Publisher: | Elsevier |
| Issue Date: | 10-May-2010 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2010.05.001 |
| Keywords: | Etna flow unit compound flow superposition |
| Abstract: | Basaltic 'a'ā lava flows often demonstrate compound morphology, consisting of many juxtaposed and
superposed flow units. Following observations made during the 2001 eruption of Mt. Etna, Sicily, we
examine the processes that can result from the superposition of flow units, when the underlying units are
sufficiently young to have immature crusts and deformable cores. During this eruption, we observed that
the emplacement of new surface flow units may reactivate older, underlying units by squeezing the still-hot
flow core away from the site of loading. Here, we illustrate three different styles of reactivation that depend
on the time elapsed between the emplacement of the two flow units, hence the rheological contrast between
them. For relatively long time intervals (2 to 15 days), and consequently significant rheological contrasts,
superposition can pressurise the underlying flow unit, leading to crustal rupture and the subsequent
extrusion of a small volume of high yield strength lava. Following shorter intervals (1 to 2 days), the
increased pressure caused by superposition can result in renewed, slow advance of the underlying
immature flow unit front. On timescales of < 1 day, where there is little rheological contrast between the
two units, the thin intervening crust can be disrupted during superposition, allowing mixing of the flow
cores, large-scale reactivation of both units, and widespread channel drainage. This mechanism may
explain the presence of drained channels in flows that are known to have been cooling-limited, contrary to
the usual interpretation of drainage as an indicator of volume-limited behaviour. Because the
remobilisation of previously stagnant lava can occur swiftly and unexpectedly, it may pose a significant
hazard during the emplacement of compound flows. Constant monitoring of flow development to identify
areas where superposition is occurring is therefore recommended, as this may allow potentially hazardous
rapid drainage events to be forecast. Reactivation processes should also be borne in mind when
reconstructing the emplacement of old lava flow fields, as failure to recognise their effects may result in the
misinterpretation of features such as drained channels. |
| Appears in Collections: | Papers Published / Papers in press 04.08.08. Volcanic risk
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | Visibility |
| Applegarth et al 2010b-in print.pdf | main article | 762.41 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open
|
|
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|