Options
Progress report on the ongoing activity for constructing a catalogue of geological/geotechnical information at accelerometric stations
Sponsors
Progetto DPC-INGV S4 "Banca dati accelerometrica" - Task 2
Language
English
Obiettivo Specifico
4.1. Metodologie sismologiche per l'ingegneria sismica
Status
Published
Peer review journal
Yes
Issued date
May 2009
Alternative Location
Abstract
The main goals within Task2 are:
• the development of the new standard format for station monograph;
• collection, organization and synthesis of geological, geomorphological, geotechnical and
geophysical data;
• evaluation of the reliability of the existing data;
• compilation of station monographs;
• a site classification.
All the research units are involved in the collection and elaboration of data relevant to the
compilation of the monographs.
RU2 (INGV-RM1) and RU6 (UniRM1-DISG) have directly contributed in the development
of the structure and content of the new monograph, and in the release of the first proposal of
site classification.
Additional contributions from other RUs concern the assessment of the reliability of the
existing shear wave velocity data (RU4 - PoliTO), the preparation of the geomechanical
section of the new monograph (RU7 - UniSI-UniRM1-DST) and for web support to data
collection and online monograph compilation (RU1 (INGV-MI).
• the development of the new standard format for station monograph;
• collection, organization and synthesis of geological, geomorphological, geotechnical and
geophysical data;
• evaluation of the reliability of the existing data;
• compilation of station monographs;
• a site classification.
All the research units are involved in the collection and elaboration of data relevant to the
compilation of the monographs.
RU2 (INGV-RM1) and RU6 (UniRM1-DISG) have directly contributed in the development
of the structure and content of the new monograph, and in the release of the first proposal of
site classification.
Additional contributions from other RUs concern the assessment of the reliability of the
existing shear wave velocity data (RU4 - PoliTO), the preparation of the geomechanical
section of the new monograph (RU7 - UniSI-UniRM1-DST) and for web support to data
collection and online monograph compilation (RU1 (INGV-MI).
References
Di Alessandro, C., L. F. Bonilla, A. Rovelli, O. Scotti (2008). Influence of site classification
on computing empirical ground-motion prediction equations in Italy, Abstract presented at
AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, California, December 9-12 2008.
EC8 (2003). ENV 1998-1-1, EUROCODE 8 - Design of Structures for Earthquake
Resistance, December, 2003.
Kayen R., Scasserra G., Stewart J.P., Lanzo G. (2008). “Shear wave structure of Umbria and
Marche, Italy, strong motion seismometers sites affected by the 1997 Umbria-Marche,
Italy, earthquake sequence”, USGS, Menlo Park, California, USA, Open File Report
2008-1010, pp. 46 (http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1010/)
Marra F., Azzara R., Bellocci, F., Caserta A., Cultrera G., Mele G., Palombo B., Rovelli A. &
Boschi E. (2000). Large amplification of ground motion at rock sites within a fault zone in
Nocera Umbra (central Italy). Journal of Seismology, 4, 543-554.
Martino S., Minutolo A., Paciello A., Rovelli A., Scarascia Mugnozza G. & Verrubbi V.
(2006). Seismic microzonation of jointed rock-mass ridges through a combined
geomechanical and seismometric approach. Natural Hazards, 39, 419-449.
NTC (2008). Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni. DM 14 gennaio 2008, Gazzetta Ufficiale, n.
29 del 4 febbraio 2008, Supplemento Ordinario n. 30, Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello
Stato, Roma (www.cslp.it).
Rovelli A., Caserta A., Marra F. & Ruggiero V. (2002). Can seismic waves be trapped inside
an inactive fault zone? The case study of Nocera Umbra, Central Italy. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 92, 2217-2232.
on computing empirical ground-motion prediction equations in Italy, Abstract presented at
AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, California, December 9-12 2008.
EC8 (2003). ENV 1998-1-1, EUROCODE 8 - Design of Structures for Earthquake
Resistance, December, 2003.
Kayen R., Scasserra G., Stewart J.P., Lanzo G. (2008). “Shear wave structure of Umbria and
Marche, Italy, strong motion seismometers sites affected by the 1997 Umbria-Marche,
Italy, earthquake sequence”, USGS, Menlo Park, California, USA, Open File Report
2008-1010, pp. 46 (http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1010/)
Marra F., Azzara R., Bellocci, F., Caserta A., Cultrera G., Mele G., Palombo B., Rovelli A. &
Boschi E. (2000). Large amplification of ground motion at rock sites within a fault zone in
Nocera Umbra (central Italy). Journal of Seismology, 4, 543-554.
Martino S., Minutolo A., Paciello A., Rovelli A., Scarascia Mugnozza G. & Verrubbi V.
(2006). Seismic microzonation of jointed rock-mass ridges through a combined
geomechanical and seismometric approach. Natural Hazards, 39, 419-449.
NTC (2008). Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni. DM 14 gennaio 2008, Gazzetta Ufficiale, n.
29 del 4 febbraio 2008, Supplemento Ordinario n. 30, Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello
Stato, Roma (www.cslp.it).
Rovelli A., Caserta A., Marra F. & Ruggiero V. (2002). Can seismic waves be trapped inside
an inactive fault zone? The case study of Nocera Umbra, Central Italy. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 92, 2217-2232.
Type
report
File(s)
Loading...
Name
Task 2 - S4 INGV - deliverable_d4.pdf
Description
Scientific Report
Size
2.05 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
3b4bf717d439bb561cf35dc0da7eff65